Is it not correct to say “I have the brown eyes” instead of “I have brown eyes”, and why?
I encountered the following sentence in a Duolingo French course and there are no other sentences:
I have brown eyes.
However, I was told that "I have the brown eyes." is not correct here. I don't understand the reason, so I would like to ask, why is the use of a definite article (the) not correct in this sentence?
articles definite-article
add a comment |
I encountered the following sentence in a Duolingo French course and there are no other sentences:
I have brown eyes.
However, I was told that "I have the brown eyes." is not correct here. I don't understand the reason, so I would like to ask, why is the use of a definite article (the) not correct in this sentence?
articles definite-article
add a comment |
I encountered the following sentence in a Duolingo French course and there are no other sentences:
I have brown eyes.
However, I was told that "I have the brown eyes." is not correct here. I don't understand the reason, so I would like to ask, why is the use of a definite article (the) not correct in this sentence?
articles definite-article
I encountered the following sentence in a Duolingo French course and there are no other sentences:
I have brown eyes.
However, I was told that "I have the brown eyes." is not correct here. I don't understand the reason, so I would like to ask, why is the use of a definite article (the) not correct in this sentence?
articles definite-article
articles definite-article
edited 49 mins ago
ColleenV♦
10.4k53159
10.4k53159
asked 2 hours ago
BlaszardBlaszard
2774517
2774517
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Eyes is a "plural count noun" and in this case we are talking about your eyes generally, rather than specifically. As a result, you can omit the the.
See Rule #3 here:
All things or things in general: Use no article with plural count
nouns or any noncount nouns used to mean all or in general.
In the case of your other example:
I have the brown eyes
If you were talking about a pair of glass eyeballs, that could be a correct sentence, but it's referring to a specific pair of eyes, rather than a general fact about yourself.
Similarly, we say
I am tall
and not
I have the height
And
I am hungry
and not
I have the hunger
New contributor
1
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
For example :We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
.I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.
– J...
25 mins ago
add a comment |
In certain contexts, the following is grammatical and idiomatic:
I have the brown eyes.
For example, if you're showing to someone a photograph of yourself as a child, and in the photo you are in the company of several children all about the same age as yourself, you might say
I have the blue eyes.
I have the bloody cheek.
I have the hat on.
to refer to the thing as a distinguishing feature. The statements above could be paraphrased as follows:
I am the one whose eyes are blue.
I am the one whose cheek is bloody
I am the one who is wearing a hat.
In the context of the photo, the feature is enough to single you out. There is only one instance of the feature in the photo.
add a comment |
From a comment, it appears that you're coming from a French background, so I'll answer in that context.
English article usage is similar in many ways to French usage, but not identical. One key difference is that in English we do not always use the definite article (or any article) when describing general concepts, or classes or categories.
I always have a glass of milk with dinner because I like milk not ...because I like the milk. The milk would refer only to a specific kind of milk, not milk in general.
Patience is a virtue not the patience is a virtue. Again, the patience would only refer to a specific kind of patience, such as you have the patience of a saint.
I have brown hair not I have the brown hair. Same as above.
There are cases when you can describe a general concept or class with either no article and plural, or definite article and singular. For instance:
French people love good wine or The French people love good wine
Lions are apex predators or The lion is an apex predator
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
add a comment |
'The' here would suggest that you have special kind of brown eyes.and Many people can have brown eyes which doesn't make having brown eyes unique. For ex-The sun-it means there is only one sun(well in our solar system)
Hence if we say The brown eyes-it means there is only one pair of this kind of eyes.
Another example-He is the man who killed her.It means there is only one special definite single person who killed her.
add a comment |
There is no plural indefinite article in English, and this is a situation that would take an indefinite article.
I have a large nose.
I have small ears.
I have ten fingers.
I have a broken leg.
Why the indefinite article? Here's the OED definition of a:
Used in an indefinite noun phrase referring to something not specifically identified (and, frequently, mentioned for the first time) but treated as one of a class: one, some, any (the oneness, or indefiniteness, being implied rather than asserted).
Emphasis mine. Roughly speaking, there are lots of large noses in the world, and the speaker in my first example is stating that they have one of them.
In certain contexts, the definite article might be appropriate, as Tᴚoɯɐuo mentions: when the characteristic being referred to is the only one in the set of people under discussion, such as when looking at photograph, or identifying a person in a room.
[Looking at a photograph] Q: Which are you? A: I'm the one with the large nose.
This only works because the answerer is the only person in the photograph with a large nose.
What if the photograph had several people with large noses, and several people with red hats, but the answerer was the only person with both? Indefinite articles.
A: I'm the one with a large nose and a red hat.
And if these were plural, we would use the plural indefinite if it existed, but since it does not, we use nothing:
A: I'm the one with a large nose and brown eyes.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192152%2fis-it-not-correct-to-say-i-have-the-brown-eyes-instead-of-i-have-brown-eyes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Eyes is a "plural count noun" and in this case we are talking about your eyes generally, rather than specifically. As a result, you can omit the the.
See Rule #3 here:
All things or things in general: Use no article with plural count
nouns or any noncount nouns used to mean all or in general.
In the case of your other example:
I have the brown eyes
If you were talking about a pair of glass eyeballs, that could be a correct sentence, but it's referring to a specific pair of eyes, rather than a general fact about yourself.
Similarly, we say
I am tall
and not
I have the height
And
I am hungry
and not
I have the hunger
New contributor
1
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
For example :We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
.I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.
– J...
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Eyes is a "plural count noun" and in this case we are talking about your eyes generally, rather than specifically. As a result, you can omit the the.
See Rule #3 here:
All things or things in general: Use no article with plural count
nouns or any noncount nouns used to mean all or in general.
In the case of your other example:
I have the brown eyes
If you were talking about a pair of glass eyeballs, that could be a correct sentence, but it's referring to a specific pair of eyes, rather than a general fact about yourself.
Similarly, we say
I am tall
and not
I have the height
And
I am hungry
and not
I have the hunger
New contributor
1
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
For example :We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
.I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.
– J...
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Eyes is a "plural count noun" and in this case we are talking about your eyes generally, rather than specifically. As a result, you can omit the the.
See Rule #3 here:
All things or things in general: Use no article with plural count
nouns or any noncount nouns used to mean all or in general.
In the case of your other example:
I have the brown eyes
If you were talking about a pair of glass eyeballs, that could be a correct sentence, but it's referring to a specific pair of eyes, rather than a general fact about yourself.
Similarly, we say
I am tall
and not
I have the height
And
I am hungry
and not
I have the hunger
New contributor
Eyes is a "plural count noun" and in this case we are talking about your eyes generally, rather than specifically. As a result, you can omit the the.
See Rule #3 here:
All things or things in general: Use no article with plural count
nouns or any noncount nouns used to mean all or in general.
In the case of your other example:
I have the brown eyes
If you were talking about a pair of glass eyeballs, that could be a correct sentence, but it's referring to a specific pair of eyes, rather than a general fact about yourself.
Similarly, we say
I am tall
and not
I have the height
And
I am hungry
and not
I have the hunger
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Mako212Mako212
1662
1662
New contributor
New contributor
1
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
For example :We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
.I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.
– J...
25 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
For example :We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
.I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.
– J...
25 mins ago
1
1
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
Thanks. I found that my answer was wrong since the sentence talks about the generality. But in English, is there a case where "the" is used to express the generality?
– Blaszard
1 hour ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
@Blaszard If the group is large enough, it ends up sounding general even though it actually isn't. For example, 'the people' refers to the people of a specific place, but if that place is an entire country then the phrase sounds extremely general.
– otah007
32 mins ago
For example :
We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
. I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.– J...
25 mins ago
For example :
We've lost the boxes of eyes for assembling the dragon statues - has anyone seen them?
. I have the brown eyes, but I haven't seen the box of blue ones
.– J...
25 mins ago
add a comment |
In certain contexts, the following is grammatical and idiomatic:
I have the brown eyes.
For example, if you're showing to someone a photograph of yourself as a child, and in the photo you are in the company of several children all about the same age as yourself, you might say
I have the blue eyes.
I have the bloody cheek.
I have the hat on.
to refer to the thing as a distinguishing feature. The statements above could be paraphrased as follows:
I am the one whose eyes are blue.
I am the one whose cheek is bloody
I am the one who is wearing a hat.
In the context of the photo, the feature is enough to single you out. There is only one instance of the feature in the photo.
add a comment |
In certain contexts, the following is grammatical and idiomatic:
I have the brown eyes.
For example, if you're showing to someone a photograph of yourself as a child, and in the photo you are in the company of several children all about the same age as yourself, you might say
I have the blue eyes.
I have the bloody cheek.
I have the hat on.
to refer to the thing as a distinguishing feature. The statements above could be paraphrased as follows:
I am the one whose eyes are blue.
I am the one whose cheek is bloody
I am the one who is wearing a hat.
In the context of the photo, the feature is enough to single you out. There is only one instance of the feature in the photo.
add a comment |
In certain contexts, the following is grammatical and idiomatic:
I have the brown eyes.
For example, if you're showing to someone a photograph of yourself as a child, and in the photo you are in the company of several children all about the same age as yourself, you might say
I have the blue eyes.
I have the bloody cheek.
I have the hat on.
to refer to the thing as a distinguishing feature. The statements above could be paraphrased as follows:
I am the one whose eyes are blue.
I am the one whose cheek is bloody
I am the one who is wearing a hat.
In the context of the photo, the feature is enough to single you out. There is only one instance of the feature in the photo.
In certain contexts, the following is grammatical and idiomatic:
I have the brown eyes.
For example, if you're showing to someone a photograph of yourself as a child, and in the photo you are in the company of several children all about the same age as yourself, you might say
I have the blue eyes.
I have the bloody cheek.
I have the hat on.
to refer to the thing as a distinguishing feature. The statements above could be paraphrased as follows:
I am the one whose eyes are blue.
I am the one whose cheek is bloody
I am the one who is wearing a hat.
In the context of the photo, the feature is enough to single you out. There is only one instance of the feature in the photo.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
109k683176
109k683176
add a comment |
add a comment |
From a comment, it appears that you're coming from a French background, so I'll answer in that context.
English article usage is similar in many ways to French usage, but not identical. One key difference is that in English we do not always use the definite article (or any article) when describing general concepts, or classes or categories.
I always have a glass of milk with dinner because I like milk not ...because I like the milk. The milk would refer only to a specific kind of milk, not milk in general.
Patience is a virtue not the patience is a virtue. Again, the patience would only refer to a specific kind of patience, such as you have the patience of a saint.
I have brown hair not I have the brown hair. Same as above.
There are cases when you can describe a general concept or class with either no article and plural, or definite article and singular. For instance:
French people love good wine or The French people love good wine
Lions are apex predators or The lion is an apex predator
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
add a comment |
From a comment, it appears that you're coming from a French background, so I'll answer in that context.
English article usage is similar in many ways to French usage, but not identical. One key difference is that in English we do not always use the definite article (or any article) when describing general concepts, or classes or categories.
I always have a glass of milk with dinner because I like milk not ...because I like the milk. The milk would refer only to a specific kind of milk, not milk in general.
Patience is a virtue not the patience is a virtue. Again, the patience would only refer to a specific kind of patience, such as you have the patience of a saint.
I have brown hair not I have the brown hair. Same as above.
There are cases when you can describe a general concept or class with either no article and plural, or definite article and singular. For instance:
French people love good wine or The French people love good wine
Lions are apex predators or The lion is an apex predator
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
add a comment |
From a comment, it appears that you're coming from a French background, so I'll answer in that context.
English article usage is similar in many ways to French usage, but not identical. One key difference is that in English we do not always use the definite article (or any article) when describing general concepts, or classes or categories.
I always have a glass of milk with dinner because I like milk not ...because I like the milk. The milk would refer only to a specific kind of milk, not milk in general.
Patience is a virtue not the patience is a virtue. Again, the patience would only refer to a specific kind of patience, such as you have the patience of a saint.
I have brown hair not I have the brown hair. Same as above.
There are cases when you can describe a general concept or class with either no article and plural, or definite article and singular. For instance:
French people love good wine or The French people love good wine
Lions are apex predators or The lion is an apex predator
From a comment, it appears that you're coming from a French background, so I'll answer in that context.
English article usage is similar in many ways to French usage, but not identical. One key difference is that in English we do not always use the definite article (or any article) when describing general concepts, or classes or categories.
I always have a glass of milk with dinner because I like milk not ...because I like the milk. The milk would refer only to a specific kind of milk, not milk in general.
Patience is a virtue not the patience is a virtue. Again, the patience would only refer to a specific kind of patience, such as you have the patience of a saint.
I have brown hair not I have the brown hair. Same as above.
There are cases when you can describe a general concept or class with either no article and plural, or definite article and singular. For instance:
French people love good wine or The French people love good wine
Lions are apex predators or The lion is an apex predator
answered 1 hour ago
JuhaszJuhasz
9924
9924
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
I think your initial French point is extremely relevant. I wouldn't say I'm exactly fluent in French, but so far as I know it's tu as les yeux bleus, whereas Anglophones would never include an article there except in unusual / contrived contexts.
– FumbleFingers
1 hour ago
add a comment |
'The' here would suggest that you have special kind of brown eyes.and Many people can have brown eyes which doesn't make having brown eyes unique. For ex-The sun-it means there is only one sun(well in our solar system)
Hence if we say The brown eyes-it means there is only one pair of this kind of eyes.
Another example-He is the man who killed her.It means there is only one special definite single person who killed her.
add a comment |
'The' here would suggest that you have special kind of brown eyes.and Many people can have brown eyes which doesn't make having brown eyes unique. For ex-The sun-it means there is only one sun(well in our solar system)
Hence if we say The brown eyes-it means there is only one pair of this kind of eyes.
Another example-He is the man who killed her.It means there is only one special definite single person who killed her.
add a comment |
'The' here would suggest that you have special kind of brown eyes.and Many people can have brown eyes which doesn't make having brown eyes unique. For ex-The sun-it means there is only one sun(well in our solar system)
Hence if we say The brown eyes-it means there is only one pair of this kind of eyes.
Another example-He is the man who killed her.It means there is only one special definite single person who killed her.
'The' here would suggest that you have special kind of brown eyes.and Many people can have brown eyes which doesn't make having brown eyes unique. For ex-The sun-it means there is only one sun(well in our solar system)
Hence if we say The brown eyes-it means there is only one pair of this kind of eyes.
Another example-He is the man who killed her.It means there is only one special definite single person who killed her.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Manish Kumar BalayanManish Kumar Balayan
236
236
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is no plural indefinite article in English, and this is a situation that would take an indefinite article.
I have a large nose.
I have small ears.
I have ten fingers.
I have a broken leg.
Why the indefinite article? Here's the OED definition of a:
Used in an indefinite noun phrase referring to something not specifically identified (and, frequently, mentioned for the first time) but treated as one of a class: one, some, any (the oneness, or indefiniteness, being implied rather than asserted).
Emphasis mine. Roughly speaking, there are lots of large noses in the world, and the speaker in my first example is stating that they have one of them.
In certain contexts, the definite article might be appropriate, as Tᴚoɯɐuo mentions: when the characteristic being referred to is the only one in the set of people under discussion, such as when looking at photograph, or identifying a person in a room.
[Looking at a photograph] Q: Which are you? A: I'm the one with the large nose.
This only works because the answerer is the only person in the photograph with a large nose.
What if the photograph had several people with large noses, and several people with red hats, but the answerer was the only person with both? Indefinite articles.
A: I'm the one with a large nose and a red hat.
And if these were plural, we would use the plural indefinite if it existed, but since it does not, we use nothing:
A: I'm the one with a large nose and brown eyes.
add a comment |
There is no plural indefinite article in English, and this is a situation that would take an indefinite article.
I have a large nose.
I have small ears.
I have ten fingers.
I have a broken leg.
Why the indefinite article? Here's the OED definition of a:
Used in an indefinite noun phrase referring to something not specifically identified (and, frequently, mentioned for the first time) but treated as one of a class: one, some, any (the oneness, or indefiniteness, being implied rather than asserted).
Emphasis mine. Roughly speaking, there are lots of large noses in the world, and the speaker in my first example is stating that they have one of them.
In certain contexts, the definite article might be appropriate, as Tᴚoɯɐuo mentions: when the characteristic being referred to is the only one in the set of people under discussion, such as when looking at photograph, or identifying a person in a room.
[Looking at a photograph] Q: Which are you? A: I'm the one with the large nose.
This only works because the answerer is the only person in the photograph with a large nose.
What if the photograph had several people with large noses, and several people with red hats, but the answerer was the only person with both? Indefinite articles.
A: I'm the one with a large nose and a red hat.
And if these were plural, we would use the plural indefinite if it existed, but since it does not, we use nothing:
A: I'm the one with a large nose and brown eyes.
add a comment |
There is no plural indefinite article in English, and this is a situation that would take an indefinite article.
I have a large nose.
I have small ears.
I have ten fingers.
I have a broken leg.
Why the indefinite article? Here's the OED definition of a:
Used in an indefinite noun phrase referring to something not specifically identified (and, frequently, mentioned for the first time) but treated as one of a class: one, some, any (the oneness, or indefiniteness, being implied rather than asserted).
Emphasis mine. Roughly speaking, there are lots of large noses in the world, and the speaker in my first example is stating that they have one of them.
In certain contexts, the definite article might be appropriate, as Tᴚoɯɐuo mentions: when the characteristic being referred to is the only one in the set of people under discussion, such as when looking at photograph, or identifying a person in a room.
[Looking at a photograph] Q: Which are you? A: I'm the one with the large nose.
This only works because the answerer is the only person in the photograph with a large nose.
What if the photograph had several people with large noses, and several people with red hats, but the answerer was the only person with both? Indefinite articles.
A: I'm the one with a large nose and a red hat.
And if these were plural, we would use the plural indefinite if it existed, but since it does not, we use nothing:
A: I'm the one with a large nose and brown eyes.
There is no plural indefinite article in English, and this is a situation that would take an indefinite article.
I have a large nose.
I have small ears.
I have ten fingers.
I have a broken leg.
Why the indefinite article? Here's the OED definition of a:
Used in an indefinite noun phrase referring to something not specifically identified (and, frequently, mentioned for the first time) but treated as one of a class: one, some, any (the oneness, or indefiniteness, being implied rather than asserted).
Emphasis mine. Roughly speaking, there are lots of large noses in the world, and the speaker in my first example is stating that they have one of them.
In certain contexts, the definite article might be appropriate, as Tᴚoɯɐuo mentions: when the characteristic being referred to is the only one in the set of people under discussion, such as when looking at photograph, or identifying a person in a room.
[Looking at a photograph] Q: Which are you? A: I'm the one with the large nose.
This only works because the answerer is the only person in the photograph with a large nose.
What if the photograph had several people with large noses, and several people with red hats, but the answerer was the only person with both? Indefinite articles.
A: I'm the one with a large nose and a red hat.
And if these were plural, we would use the plural indefinite if it existed, but since it does not, we use nothing:
A: I'm the one with a large nose and brown eyes.
answered 17 mins ago
Matthew WMatthew W
1,838619
1,838619
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192152%2fis-it-not-correct-to-say-i-have-the-brown-eyes-instead-of-i-have-brown-eyes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown