Is it possible to multiply a set by a natural number?
Say I have a set $S={1, 4, 10, 7}$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S={3, 12, 30, 21}$? Any help would be really appreciated.
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Say I have a set $S={1, 4, 10, 7}$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S={3, 12, 30, 21}$? Any help would be really appreciated.
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
Yes you could just define $$n{a_i}={na_i}$$
– clathratus
49 mins ago
2
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= {1,4,10,7}$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set ${3,12,20,21}$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
– fleablood
37 mins ago
add a comment |
Say I have a set $S={1, 4, 10, 7}$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S={3, 12, 30, 21}$? Any help would be really appreciated.
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Say I have a set $S={1, 4, 10, 7}$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S={3, 12, 30, 21}$? Any help would be really appreciated.
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
edited 48 mins ago
clathratus
3,320331
3,320331
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
asked 1 hour ago
Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura
211
211
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
Yes you could just define $$n{a_i}={na_i}$$
– clathratus
49 mins ago
2
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= {1,4,10,7}$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set ${3,12,20,21}$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
– fleablood
37 mins ago
add a comment |
2
Yes you could just define $$n{a_i}={na_i}$$
– clathratus
49 mins ago
2
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= {1,4,10,7}$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set ${3,12,20,21}$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
– fleablood
37 mins ago
2
2
Yes you could just define $$n{a_i}={na_i}$$
– clathratus
49 mins ago
Yes you could just define $$n{a_i}={na_i}$$
– clathratus
49 mins ago
2
2
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= {1,4,10,7}$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set ${3,12,20,21}$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
– fleablood
37 mins ago
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= {1,4,10,7}$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set ${3,12,20,21}$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
– fleablood
37 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z={dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots}$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z={dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots}$.
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
add a comment |
Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065819%2fis-it-possible-to-multiply-a-set-by-a-natural-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z={dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots}$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z={dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots}$.
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
add a comment |
Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z={dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots}$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z={dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots}$.
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
add a comment |
Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z={dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots}$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z={dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots}$.
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z={dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots}$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z={dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots}$.
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
answered 1 hour ago
John DoeJohn Doe
10.7k11237
10.7k11237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
add a comment |
Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
add a comment |
Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
answered 1 hour ago
ershersh
19510
19510
add a comment |
add a comment |
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hunter Kimura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065819%2fis-it-possible-to-multiply-a-set-by-a-natural-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Yes you could just define $$n{a_i}={na_i}$$
– clathratus
49 mins ago
2
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= {1,4,10,7}$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set ${3,12,20,21}$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
– fleablood
37 mins ago