Storage performance slowed down after changing RAID 5 configuration












0














I have an HP Proliant server with CentOS 6.9.




  1. First I had 4x 10k disks in RAID 5 and I created 2 filesystems on it. When I was restoring my database it only took 1 hour.


  2. A few days ago, I changed my hardware configuration. Now I have 5x 10k disks with RAID 5 and it took about 6 hours to restore the same database.



Question is: What could be the reason for the slow-down?






centos performance software-raid raid5







share|improve this question
























  • Please state if you use mdadm or what kind of controller you have.
    – Vlastimil
    9 mins ago










  • Also, please add your specific model of HP Proliant server.
    – Vlastimil
    3 mins ago










  • In addition, you could state why you have decided to use RAID 5, which is just horrible.
    – Vlastimil
    2 mins ago
















0














I have an HP Proliant server with CentOS 6.9.




  1. First I had 4x 10k disks in RAID 5 and I created 2 filesystems on it. When I was restoring my database it only took 1 hour.


  2. A few days ago, I changed my hardware configuration. Now I have 5x 10k disks with RAID 5 and it took about 6 hours to restore the same database.



Question is: What could be the reason for the slow-down?






centos performance software-raid raid5







share|improve this question
























  • Please state if you use mdadm or what kind of controller you have.
    – Vlastimil
    9 mins ago










  • Also, please add your specific model of HP Proliant server.
    – Vlastimil
    3 mins ago










  • In addition, you could state why you have decided to use RAID 5, which is just horrible.
    – Vlastimil
    2 mins ago














0












0








0







I have an HP Proliant server with CentOS 6.9.




  1. First I had 4x 10k disks in RAID 5 and I created 2 filesystems on it. When I was restoring my database it only took 1 hour.


  2. A few days ago, I changed my hardware configuration. Now I have 5x 10k disks with RAID 5 and it took about 6 hours to restore the same database.



Question is: What could be the reason for the slow-down?






centos performance software-raid raid5







share|improve this question















I have an HP Proliant server with CentOS 6.9.




  1. First I had 4x 10k disks in RAID 5 and I created 2 filesystems on it. When I was restoring my database it only took 1 hour.


  2. A few days ago, I changed my hardware configuration. Now I have 5x 10k disks with RAID 5 and it took about 6 hours to restore the same database.



Question is: What could be the reason for the slow-down?






centos performance software-raid raid5




centos performance software-raid raid5






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 min ago









Vlastimil

7,8271261134




7,8271261134










asked 22 mins ago









BlackCrystalBlackCrystal

32811




32811












  • Please state if you use mdadm or what kind of controller you have.
    – Vlastimil
    9 mins ago










  • Also, please add your specific model of HP Proliant server.
    – Vlastimil
    3 mins ago










  • In addition, you could state why you have decided to use RAID 5, which is just horrible.
    – Vlastimil
    2 mins ago


















  • Please state if you use mdadm or what kind of controller you have.
    – Vlastimil
    9 mins ago










  • Also, please add your specific model of HP Proliant server.
    – Vlastimil
    3 mins ago










  • In addition, you could state why you have decided to use RAID 5, which is just horrible.
    – Vlastimil
    2 mins ago
















Please state if you use mdadm or what kind of controller you have.
– Vlastimil
9 mins ago




Please state if you use mdadm or what kind of controller you have.
– Vlastimil
9 mins ago












Also, please add your specific model of HP Proliant server.
– Vlastimil
3 mins ago




Also, please add your specific model of HP Proliant server.
– Vlastimil
3 mins ago












In addition, you could state why you have decided to use RAID 5, which is just horrible.
– Vlastimil
2 mins ago




In addition, you could state why you have decided to use RAID 5, which is just horrible.
– Vlastimil
2 mins ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493152%2fstorage-performance-slowed-down-after-changing-raid-5-configuration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493152%2fstorage-performance-slowed-down-after-changing-raid-5-configuration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

濃尾地震

Image
濃尾地震 『岐阜市街大地震之図』 歌川国利画 本震 発生日 1891年（明治24年）10月28日 発生時刻 6時38分50秒（JST） 震央 日本 岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市） 北緯35度35分 東経136度20分（ 地図 ） 規模    マグニチュード（M）8.0 最大震度    震度7： 注1 福井県今立郡鯖江町、愛知県葉栗郡大田島村、東春日井郡勝川村 地震の種類 直下型地震 被害 死傷者数 死者7,273人、負傷者17,175人 注1：当時の震度階級では「激烈」 プロジェクト:地球科学 プロジェクト:災害 テンプレートを表示 濃尾地震 （のうびじしん）は、1891年（明治24年）10月28日に濃尾地方で発生した、日本史上最大の内陸地殻内地震。「 美濃・尾張地震 （みの・おわりじしん）」とも呼ばれている。辛卯の年に発生したことから 辛卯震災 と呼んでいる報告書もある。 目次 1 概要 1.1 震源断層 2 被害 3 各地の震度 4 前兆現象 5 報道 6 学術的な意義 7 地震防災 8 脚注 9 関連項目 10 外部リンク 概要 濃尾地震発生当時の根尾谷断層 濃尾地震を引き起こした根尾谷断層 写真中央を斜めに走る段差が根尾谷断層 濃尾地震は、1891年10月28日6時38分50秒に発生した。震源は、岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市）、北緯35度35分、東経136度20分付近。河角廣 (1951) は岐阜市付近（北緯35.6度、東経136.6度）に震央を仮定し規模 M K = 7.0 を与え [1] 、マグニチュードは M = 8.4 に換算されているが、明治・大正期の地震については0.5程度大きく見積もられているとされる [2] 。また、震央距離と震度との関係など当時のデータから後にM8.0 [3] とも推定される。アメリカ地質調査所 (USGS) でも8.0としている [4] 。「根尾谷断層帯」が活動した典型的な内陸地殻内地震（いわゆる直下型地震）であり、これは記録が残っている日本の内陸
Read more

How to rewrite equation of hyperbola in standard form

Image
2 $begingroup$ I was wondering about this question: $$ 9 x ^ 2 -4y^2-72x=0 $$ What is the step-by-step process of writing such an equation which, in this case, has the graph of a hyperbola in standard form? Please excuse me for my messy equation. As I am relatively new to Mathematics Stack Exchange, I do not know how to insert superscripts. Thank you ahead of time! calculus conic-sections share | cite | improve this question edited 2 hours ago Key Flex 8,637 6 12 33 asked 2 hours ago
Read more

No ethernet ip address in my vocore2

Image
0 I just flashed my vocore2u with openwrt 18.06.1, and plug it with an ethernet cable to access network while setting up wireless access-point for my phone. The AP is working and connected to the network, but the ip in my phone is in the subnet of another router. And there's no ip assigned to my vocore2 so I cannot ssh into it. After connecting to vocore2 with serial terminal, ping 8.8.8.8 is also failed. How can I make my vocore2 gain ip from the router and setting up the network well? root@OpenWrt:/etc/config# ifconfig apcli0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BA:D8:12:07:01:71 inet6 addr: fe80::b8d8:12ff:fe07:171/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 erro
Read more