Simple-looking horrifyingly difficult (to me) resistance circuits












4














I'm doing some physics homework calculating the total resistance between points A and B and while some circuits are comprehensible, there are two that I can't understand how they work at all.



So, it is my pleasure to present to you these two monstrosities:



The divided squareThe hellborn triangles of death



How do I approach the crossing resistances in each one? Here's where I am as of writing this post:



THE DIVIDED SQUARE:




  • The two 10k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The 20k and 9k resistances are parallel to each other

  • I don't know what to do with the 5k one


THE HELLBORN TRIANGLES OF DEATH:




  • The first and last pair of 5k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The bottom center 5k resistance is in series with the previous two couples

  • I don't know what to do with the 15k ones


So, long story short, how should I approach the problem when the resistances are connected by both sides and the circuit looks like the voltage should converge inside them and start burning?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Do you ever tried also to take in consideration the Y-$Delta$ transformations? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform) they are useful whenever you reach a triangle-like or a delta like group, like in your case...
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago












  • I haven't been taught that transformation. Could you elaborate a bit on it or send me a link please? Oooooh I can see it now. Thanks for the link! You saved my degree :p
    – Groctel
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    Have you tried redrawing the diagrams? You'd be surprised how helpful it can be to draw them in the way your brain wants to see them :)
    – N. Steinle
    1 hour ago










  • yes @N.Steinle is right, sometimes is just a matter of drawing them in order. I personally use the transformations Y-$Delta$ (that in Italy are just called "triangle-star")seldomly while i prefere to re-draw like Steinle said. But in some cases that transformations are really time-saving!
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago
















4














I'm doing some physics homework calculating the total resistance between points A and B and while some circuits are comprehensible, there are two that I can't understand how they work at all.



So, it is my pleasure to present to you these two monstrosities:



The divided squareThe hellborn triangles of death



How do I approach the crossing resistances in each one? Here's where I am as of writing this post:



THE DIVIDED SQUARE:




  • The two 10k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The 20k and 9k resistances are parallel to each other

  • I don't know what to do with the 5k one


THE HELLBORN TRIANGLES OF DEATH:




  • The first and last pair of 5k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The bottom center 5k resistance is in series with the previous two couples

  • I don't know what to do with the 15k ones


So, long story short, how should I approach the problem when the resistances are connected by both sides and the circuit looks like the voltage should converge inside them and start burning?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Do you ever tried also to take in consideration the Y-$Delta$ transformations? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform) they are useful whenever you reach a triangle-like or a delta like group, like in your case...
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago












  • I haven't been taught that transformation. Could you elaborate a bit on it or send me a link please? Oooooh I can see it now. Thanks for the link! You saved my degree :p
    – Groctel
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    Have you tried redrawing the diagrams? You'd be surprised how helpful it can be to draw them in the way your brain wants to see them :)
    – N. Steinle
    1 hour ago










  • yes @N.Steinle is right, sometimes is just a matter of drawing them in order. I personally use the transformations Y-$Delta$ (that in Italy are just called "triangle-star")seldomly while i prefere to re-draw like Steinle said. But in some cases that transformations are really time-saving!
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago














4












4








4


1





I'm doing some physics homework calculating the total resistance between points A and B and while some circuits are comprehensible, there are two that I can't understand how they work at all.



So, it is my pleasure to present to you these two monstrosities:



The divided squareThe hellborn triangles of death



How do I approach the crossing resistances in each one? Here's where I am as of writing this post:



THE DIVIDED SQUARE:




  • The two 10k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The 20k and 9k resistances are parallel to each other

  • I don't know what to do with the 5k one


THE HELLBORN TRIANGLES OF DEATH:




  • The first and last pair of 5k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The bottom center 5k resistance is in series with the previous two couples

  • I don't know what to do with the 15k ones


So, long story short, how should I approach the problem when the resistances are connected by both sides and the circuit looks like the voltage should converge inside them and start burning?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm doing some physics homework calculating the total resistance between points A and B and while some circuits are comprehensible, there are two that I can't understand how they work at all.



So, it is my pleasure to present to you these two monstrosities:



The divided squareThe hellborn triangles of death



How do I approach the crossing resistances in each one? Here's where I am as of writing this post:



THE DIVIDED SQUARE:




  • The two 10k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The 20k and 9k resistances are parallel to each other

  • I don't know what to do with the 5k one


THE HELLBORN TRIANGLES OF DEATH:




  • The first and last pair of 5k resistances are parallel to each other

  • The bottom center 5k resistance is in series with the previous two couples

  • I don't know what to do with the 15k ones


So, long story short, how should I approach the problem when the resistances are connected by both sides and the circuit looks like the voltage should converge inside them and start burning?







homework-and-exercises electric-circuits electrical-resistance






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









G. Smith

4,7871020




4,7871020






New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









GroctelGroctel

435




435




New contributor




Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    Do you ever tried also to take in consideration the Y-$Delta$ transformations? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform) they are useful whenever you reach a triangle-like or a delta like group, like in your case...
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago












  • I haven't been taught that transformation. Could you elaborate a bit on it or send me a link please? Oooooh I can see it now. Thanks for the link! You saved my degree :p
    – Groctel
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    Have you tried redrawing the diagrams? You'd be surprised how helpful it can be to draw them in the way your brain wants to see them :)
    – N. Steinle
    1 hour ago










  • yes @N.Steinle is right, sometimes is just a matter of drawing them in order. I personally use the transformations Y-$Delta$ (that in Italy are just called "triangle-star")seldomly while i prefere to re-draw like Steinle said. But in some cases that transformations are really time-saving!
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    Do you ever tried also to take in consideration the Y-$Delta$ transformations? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform) they are useful whenever you reach a triangle-like or a delta like group, like in your case...
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago












  • I haven't been taught that transformation. Could you elaborate a bit on it or send me a link please? Oooooh I can see it now. Thanks for the link! You saved my degree :p
    – Groctel
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    Have you tried redrawing the diagrams? You'd be surprised how helpful it can be to draw them in the way your brain wants to see them :)
    – N. Steinle
    1 hour ago










  • yes @N.Steinle is right, sometimes is just a matter of drawing them in order. I personally use the transformations Y-$Delta$ (that in Italy are just called "triangle-star")seldomly while i prefere to re-draw like Steinle said. But in some cases that transformations are really time-saving!
    – Pietro Oliva
    1 hour ago








1




1




Do you ever tried also to take in consideration the Y-$Delta$ transformations? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform) they are useful whenever you reach a triangle-like or a delta like group, like in your case...
– Pietro Oliva
1 hour ago






Do you ever tried also to take in consideration the Y-$Delta$ transformations? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform) they are useful whenever you reach a triangle-like or a delta like group, like in your case...
– Pietro Oliva
1 hour ago














I haven't been taught that transformation. Could you elaborate a bit on it or send me a link please? Oooooh I can see it now. Thanks for the link! You saved my degree :p
– Groctel
1 hour ago






I haven't been taught that transformation. Could you elaborate a bit on it or send me a link please? Oooooh I can see it now. Thanks for the link! You saved my degree :p
– Groctel
1 hour ago






1




1




Have you tried redrawing the diagrams? You'd be surprised how helpful it can be to draw them in the way your brain wants to see them :)
– N. Steinle
1 hour ago




Have you tried redrawing the diagrams? You'd be surprised how helpful it can be to draw them in the way your brain wants to see them :)
– N. Steinle
1 hour ago












yes @N.Steinle is right, sometimes is just a matter of drawing them in order. I personally use the transformations Y-$Delta$ (that in Italy are just called "triangle-star")seldomly while i prefere to re-draw like Steinle said. But in some cases that transformations are really time-saving!
– Pietro Oliva
1 hour ago




yes @N.Steinle is right, sometimes is just a matter of drawing them in order. I personally use the transformations Y-$Delta$ (that in Italy are just called "triangle-star")seldomly while i prefere to re-draw like Steinle said. But in some cases that transformations are really time-saving!
– Pietro Oliva
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Try then to apply the Y-$Delta$ tranformations! I am glad you found the light! If you cannot carry calculation drop again here a line and i'll try to work more on the answer!






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    2














    As Pietro Oliva (is there a way to mention a user?) pointed out, I have to use the Y-Δ transformations to change how the circuit is viewed.



    Thanks for the super fast answer!






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
      – G. Smith
      1 hour ago












    • I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
      – Groctel
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
      – G. Smith
      1 hour ago





















    2














    For the top one, you can separate out the $9 kOmega$ resistor at the top, since it's in series with the rest. Now you have a graph with four nodes and five edges. You can assign the variables $V_1$ through $V_4$ to the nodes, but WLOG you can consider the top node to be 0 and the bottom to be 1, so that leaves just the left and right voltages. You then have currents $I_1$ through $I_5$ through the edges. You can then start applying the circuit laws to these variables: for each edge, the current is equal to change in voltage divided by the resistance. The net current through each edge is zero (if you take current flowing in to be positive and current flowing out to be negative, that is). You'll then get a bunch of equations, and solving them will give the effective resistances.



    It's probably best to work out what the effective resistances are from basic principles and algebra first, and then try to work through applying Y-Δ to get a sense of how that works.



    Also, any symmetry in the diagram should be preserved in the values. The second circuit has left-right symmetries, so the currents should be symmetrical: the two top resistors should have the same currents as each other, the two outsides diagonal resistors should have the same as each other, and the two inside diagonal should have the same as each other. So you can use just four variables to represent the nine different currents.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Groctel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452726%2fsimple-looking-horrifyingly-difficult-to-me-resistance-circuits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      Try then to apply the Y-$Delta$ tranformations! I am glad you found the light! If you cannot carry calculation drop again here a line and i'll try to work more on the answer!






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        4














        Try then to apply the Y-$Delta$ tranformations! I am glad you found the light! If you cannot carry calculation drop again here a line and i'll try to work more on the answer!






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          4












          4








          4






          Try then to apply the Y-$Delta$ tranformations! I am glad you found the light! If you cannot carry calculation drop again here a line and i'll try to work more on the answer!






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          Try then to apply the Y-$Delta$ tranformations! I am glad you found the light! If you cannot carry calculation drop again here a line and i'll try to work more on the answer!







          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 1 hour ago









          Pietro OlivaPietro Oliva

          1137




          1137




          New contributor




          Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Pietro Oliva is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              2














              As Pietro Oliva (is there a way to mention a user?) pointed out, I have to use the Y-Δ transformations to change how the circuit is viewed.



              Thanks for the super fast answer!






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















              • I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago












              • I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
                – Groctel
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago


















              2














              As Pietro Oliva (is there a way to mention a user?) pointed out, I have to use the Y-Δ transformations to change how the circuit is viewed.



              Thanks for the super fast answer!






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















              • I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago












              • I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
                – Groctel
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago
















              2












              2








              2






              As Pietro Oliva (is there a way to mention a user?) pointed out, I have to use the Y-Δ transformations to change how the circuit is viewed.



              Thanks for the super fast answer!






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              As Pietro Oliva (is there a way to mention a user?) pointed out, I have to use the Y-Δ transformations to change how the circuit is viewed.



              Thanks for the super fast answer!







              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer






              New contributor




              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 1 hour ago









              GroctelGroctel

              435




              435




              New contributor




              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Groctel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.












              • I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago












              • I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
                – Groctel
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago




















              • I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago












              • I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
                – Groctel
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
                – G. Smith
                1 hour ago


















              I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
              – G. Smith
              1 hour ago






              I doubt that your teacher expects you to know about this obscure transformation. You should be able to solve both problems just by using Kirchoff’s circuit laws.
              – G. Smith
              1 hour ago














              I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
              – Groctel
              1 hour ago




              I've only studied Kirchoff's laws for voltage and intensity. How do I apply them in this type of circuit?
              – Groctel
              1 hour ago




              1




              1




              Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
              – G. Smith
              1 hour ago






              Assign an unknown current ($I_1$, $I_2$, etc.) to each wire. Write down Kirchoff’s equations for each node and each loop. Solve for all the currents.
              – G. Smith
              1 hour ago













              2














              For the top one, you can separate out the $9 kOmega$ resistor at the top, since it's in series with the rest. Now you have a graph with four nodes and five edges. You can assign the variables $V_1$ through $V_4$ to the nodes, but WLOG you can consider the top node to be 0 and the bottom to be 1, so that leaves just the left and right voltages. You then have currents $I_1$ through $I_5$ through the edges. You can then start applying the circuit laws to these variables: for each edge, the current is equal to change in voltage divided by the resistance. The net current through each edge is zero (if you take current flowing in to be positive and current flowing out to be negative, that is). You'll then get a bunch of equations, and solving them will give the effective resistances.



              It's probably best to work out what the effective resistances are from basic principles and algebra first, and then try to work through applying Y-Δ to get a sense of how that works.



              Also, any symmetry in the diagram should be preserved in the values. The second circuit has left-right symmetries, so the currents should be symmetrical: the two top resistors should have the same currents as each other, the two outsides diagonal resistors should have the same as each other, and the two inside diagonal should have the same as each other. So you can use just four variables to represent the nine different currents.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2














                For the top one, you can separate out the $9 kOmega$ resistor at the top, since it's in series with the rest. Now you have a graph with four nodes and five edges. You can assign the variables $V_1$ through $V_4$ to the nodes, but WLOG you can consider the top node to be 0 and the bottom to be 1, so that leaves just the left and right voltages. You then have currents $I_1$ through $I_5$ through the edges. You can then start applying the circuit laws to these variables: for each edge, the current is equal to change in voltage divided by the resistance. The net current through each edge is zero (if you take current flowing in to be positive and current flowing out to be negative, that is). You'll then get a bunch of equations, and solving them will give the effective resistances.



                It's probably best to work out what the effective resistances are from basic principles and algebra first, and then try to work through applying Y-Δ to get a sense of how that works.



                Also, any symmetry in the diagram should be preserved in the values. The second circuit has left-right symmetries, so the currents should be symmetrical: the two top resistors should have the same currents as each other, the two outsides diagonal resistors should have the same as each other, and the two inside diagonal should have the same as each other. So you can use just four variables to represent the nine different currents.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  For the top one, you can separate out the $9 kOmega$ resistor at the top, since it's in series with the rest. Now you have a graph with four nodes and five edges. You can assign the variables $V_1$ through $V_4$ to the nodes, but WLOG you can consider the top node to be 0 and the bottom to be 1, so that leaves just the left and right voltages. You then have currents $I_1$ through $I_5$ through the edges. You can then start applying the circuit laws to these variables: for each edge, the current is equal to change in voltage divided by the resistance. The net current through each edge is zero (if you take current flowing in to be positive and current flowing out to be negative, that is). You'll then get a bunch of equations, and solving them will give the effective resistances.



                  It's probably best to work out what the effective resistances are from basic principles and algebra first, and then try to work through applying Y-Δ to get a sense of how that works.



                  Also, any symmetry in the diagram should be preserved in the values. The second circuit has left-right symmetries, so the currents should be symmetrical: the two top resistors should have the same currents as each other, the two outsides diagonal resistors should have the same as each other, and the two inside diagonal should have the same as each other. So you can use just four variables to represent the nine different currents.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  For the top one, you can separate out the $9 kOmega$ resistor at the top, since it's in series with the rest. Now you have a graph with four nodes and five edges. You can assign the variables $V_1$ through $V_4$ to the nodes, but WLOG you can consider the top node to be 0 and the bottom to be 1, so that leaves just the left and right voltages. You then have currents $I_1$ through $I_5$ through the edges. You can then start applying the circuit laws to these variables: for each edge, the current is equal to change in voltage divided by the resistance. The net current through each edge is zero (if you take current flowing in to be positive and current flowing out to be negative, that is). You'll then get a bunch of equations, and solving them will give the effective resistances.



                  It's probably best to work out what the effective resistances are from basic principles and algebra first, and then try to work through applying Y-Δ to get a sense of how that works.



                  Also, any symmetry in the diagram should be preserved in the values. The second circuit has left-right symmetries, so the currents should be symmetrical: the two top resistors should have the same currents as each other, the two outsides diagonal resistors should have the same as each other, and the two inside diagonal should have the same as each other. So you can use just four variables to represent the nine different currents.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 33 mins ago









                  AcccumulationAcccumulation

                  1,856210




                  1,856210






















                      Groctel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Groctel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Groctel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Groctel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452726%2fsimple-looking-horrifyingly-difficult-to-me-resistance-circuits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      CARDNET

                      Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

                      濃尾地震