Topology diagrams (labelled edges)
What is the best way to create diagrams like these in LaTeX? Is Tikz the way to go?
(Code for these specific instances would be useful but is not absolutely required, since I'll be needing to make diagrams similar in spirit but not identical. Also, this has almost certainly been asked before, so I would equally appreciate a link to a previous asking -- I'm just unsure what terms to search to find such a post.)
edit: looked at some old code and came up with
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,1) -- (0,0);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,1) -- (0,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,0) -- (1,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,0) -- (1,0);
node at (.5,-.2) {$a$};
end{tikzpicture}
although this seems rather clunky.
tikz-pgf diagrams
add a comment |
What is the best way to create diagrams like these in LaTeX? Is Tikz the way to go?
(Code for these specific instances would be useful but is not absolutely required, since I'll be needing to make diagrams similar in spirit but not identical. Also, this has almost certainly been asked before, so I would equally appreciate a link to a previous asking -- I'm just unsure what terms to search to find such a post.)
edit: looked at some old code and came up with
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,1) -- (0,0);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,1) -- (0,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,0) -- (1,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,0) -- (1,0);
node at (.5,-.2) {$a$};
end{tikzpicture}
although this seems rather clunky.
tikz-pgf diagrams
What have you tried?
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I thought about doing something with tikzpicture and explicitly stating the parametrization of each length but it seems that there ought to be a more elegant way to do it.
– zjs
2 hours ago
1
@zjs Just post what you have got. It will be much easier to see what you want if you post a code example.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
add a comment |
What is the best way to create diagrams like these in LaTeX? Is Tikz the way to go?
(Code for these specific instances would be useful but is not absolutely required, since I'll be needing to make diagrams similar in spirit but not identical. Also, this has almost certainly been asked before, so I would equally appreciate a link to a previous asking -- I'm just unsure what terms to search to find such a post.)
edit: looked at some old code and came up with
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,1) -- (0,0);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,1) -- (0,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,0) -- (1,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,0) -- (1,0);
node at (.5,-.2) {$a$};
end{tikzpicture}
although this seems rather clunky.
tikz-pgf diagrams
What is the best way to create diagrams like these in LaTeX? Is Tikz the way to go?
(Code for these specific instances would be useful but is not absolutely required, since I'll be needing to make diagrams similar in spirit but not identical. Also, this has almost certainly been asked before, so I would equally appreciate a link to a previous asking -- I'm just unsure what terms to search to find such a post.)
edit: looked at some old code and came up with
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,1) -- (0,0);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,1) -- (0,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (1,0) -- (1,1);
draw[ultra thick,domain=0:1,samples=100, postaction={decorate}, decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}] (0,0) -- (1,0);
node at (.5,-.2) {$a$};
end{tikzpicture}
although this seems rather clunky.
tikz-pgf diagrams
tikz-pgf diagrams
edited 1 hour ago
Henri Menke
70.4k8156264
70.4k8156264
asked 2 hours ago
zjszjs
305
305
What have you tried?
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I thought about doing something with tikzpicture and explicitly stating the parametrization of each length but it seems that there ought to be a more elegant way to do it.
– zjs
2 hours ago
1
@zjs Just post what you have got. It will be much easier to see what you want if you post a code example.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
add a comment |
What have you tried?
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I thought about doing something with tikzpicture and explicitly stating the parametrization of each length but it seems that there ought to be a more elegant way to do it.
– zjs
2 hours ago
1
@zjs Just post what you have got. It will be much easier to see what you want if you post a code example.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
What have you tried?
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
What have you tried?
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I thought about doing something with tikzpicture and explicitly stating the parametrization of each length but it seems that there ought to be a more elegant way to do it.
– zjs
2 hours ago
I thought about doing something with tikzpicture and explicitly stating the parametrization of each length but it seems that there ought to be a more elegant way to do it.
– zjs
2 hours ago
1
1
@zjs Just post what you have got. It will be much easier to see what you want if you post a code example.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
@zjs Just post what you have got. It will be much easier to see what you want if you post a code example.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Welcome to TeX.SE! This answer makes use of this answer.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
tikzset{lab dis/.store in=LabDis,
lab dis=0.3,
->-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{>}; node at (0,LabDis) {#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-<-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{<}; node at (0,LabDis)
{#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-*-/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {fill (0,0) circle (1.5pt);}},postaction={decorate}},
}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex]
draw[->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (0,0) rectangle (4,4);
draw[lab dis=-0.3,
-*-=0,->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.25,->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-*-=0.5,-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.75,-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (2,-4) circle (2.5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I'm not convinced by the->-
and-*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.
– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You can place nodes on a path which should simplify the node positioning a lot. You might also want to factor out the arrow business into a style
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
arrow inside/.style = {
postaction={decorate},
decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}
}
]
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [below] {$a$} (1,0);
draw[arrow inside] (0,1) -- node [above] {$a$} (1,1);
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (0,1);
draw[arrow inside] (1,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (1,1);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Maybe move rightb
outside?! :-)
– Sigur
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes.
documentclass[pstricks,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add}
begin{document}
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 45 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l/a in {0/a/<,1/b/<,2/a/>,3/b/>}{%
pcline[ArrowInside=-a](Ii)(Ithenumexpri+1)nbput{$l$}}
endpspicture
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
pnode(0,0){O}
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 135 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l in {0/a,1/b,2/a,3/b}{%
qdisk([nodesep=3.5,angle=-45]{Ii}O){2pt}
psarc{->}(0,0){3.5}{(Ii)}{(Ithenumexpri+1)}
uput{8pt}[{(Ii)}](>Ii){$l$}}
endpspicture
end{document}
Note: ArrowInside
is not available for psarc
. I don't know why.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469051%2ftopology-diagrams-labelled-edges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Welcome to TeX.SE! This answer makes use of this answer.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
tikzset{lab dis/.store in=LabDis,
lab dis=0.3,
->-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{>}; node at (0,LabDis) {#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-<-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{<}; node at (0,LabDis)
{#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-*-/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {fill (0,0) circle (1.5pt);}},postaction={decorate}},
}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex]
draw[->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (0,0) rectangle (4,4);
draw[lab dis=-0.3,
-*-=0,->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.25,->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-*-=0.5,-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.75,-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (2,-4) circle (2.5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I'm not convinced by the->-
and-*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.
– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE! This answer makes use of this answer.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
tikzset{lab dis/.store in=LabDis,
lab dis=0.3,
->-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{>}; node at (0,LabDis) {#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-<-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{<}; node at (0,LabDis)
{#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-*-/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {fill (0,0) circle (1.5pt);}},postaction={decorate}},
}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex]
draw[->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (0,0) rectangle (4,4);
draw[lab dis=-0.3,
-*-=0,->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.25,->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-*-=0.5,-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.75,-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (2,-4) circle (2.5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I'm not convinced by the->-
and-*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.
– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE! This answer makes use of this answer.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
tikzset{lab dis/.store in=LabDis,
lab dis=0.3,
->-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{>}; node at (0,LabDis) {#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-<-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{<}; node at (0,LabDis)
{#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-*-/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {fill (0,0) circle (1.5pt);}},postaction={decorate}},
}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex]
draw[->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (0,0) rectangle (4,4);
draw[lab dis=-0.3,
-*-=0,->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.25,->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-*-=0.5,-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.75,-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (2,-4) circle (2.5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Welcome to TeX.SE! This answer makes use of this answer.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
tikzset{lab dis/.store in=LabDis,
lab dis=0.3,
->-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{>}; node at (0,LabDis) {#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-<-/.style args={at #1 with label #2}{decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {arrow{<}; node at (0,LabDis)
{#2};}},postaction={decorate}},
-*-/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {fill (0,0) circle (1.5pt);}},postaction={decorate}},
}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex]
draw[->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (0,0) rectangle (4,4);
draw[lab dis=-0.3,
-*-=0,->-=at 0.125 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.25,->-=at 0.375 with label {$a$},
-*-=0.5,-<-=at 0.625 with label {$b$},
-*-=0.75,-<-=at 0.875 with label {$a$}] (2,-4) circle (2.5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
marmotmarmot
89.4k4102193
89.4k4102193
I'm not convinced by the->-
and-*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.
– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm not convinced by the->-
and-*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.
– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
I'm not convinced by the
->-
and -*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
I'm not convinced by the
->-
and -*-
notation. It's pretty hard to read. Now there are dashes everywhere.– Henri Menke
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Well, everyone can rename these things as they wish. I do not think this is a fair criticism. And if you really feel you need to make this comment, make it here, where this notation has been proposed. This answer got 69 upvotes without anyone complaining about the notation.
– marmot
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You can place nodes on a path which should simplify the node positioning a lot. You might also want to factor out the arrow business into a style
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
arrow inside/.style = {
postaction={decorate},
decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}
}
]
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [below] {$a$} (1,0);
draw[arrow inside] (0,1) -- node [above] {$a$} (1,1);
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (0,1);
draw[arrow inside] (1,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (1,1);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Maybe move rightb
outside?! :-)
– Sigur
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You can place nodes on a path which should simplify the node positioning a lot. You might also want to factor out the arrow business into a style
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
arrow inside/.style = {
postaction={decorate},
decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}
}
]
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [below] {$a$} (1,0);
draw[arrow inside] (0,1) -- node [above] {$a$} (1,1);
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (0,1);
draw[arrow inside] (1,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (1,1);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Maybe move rightb
outside?! :-)
– Sigur
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You can place nodes on a path which should simplify the node positioning a lot. You might also want to factor out the arrow business into a style
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
arrow inside/.style = {
postaction={decorate},
decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}
}
]
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [below] {$a$} (1,0);
draw[arrow inside] (0,1) -- node [above] {$a$} (1,1);
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (0,1);
draw[arrow inside] (1,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (1,1);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
You can place nodes on a path which should simplify the node positioning a lot. You might also want to factor out the arrow business into a style
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
arrow inside/.style = {
postaction={decorate},
decoration={markings, mark=at position 0.5 with {arrow{stealth}}}
}
]
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [below] {$a$} (1,0);
draw[arrow inside] (0,1) -- node [above] {$a$} (1,1);
draw[arrow inside] (0,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (0,1);
draw[arrow inside] (1,0) -- node [left] {$b$} (1,1);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
Henri MenkeHenri Menke
70.4k8156264
70.4k8156264
Maybe move rightb
outside?! :-)
– Sigur
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Maybe move rightb
outside?! :-)
– Sigur
1 hour ago
Maybe move right
b
outside?! :-)– Sigur
1 hour ago
Maybe move right
b
outside?! :-)– Sigur
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes.
documentclass[pstricks,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add}
begin{document}
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 45 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l/a in {0/a/<,1/b/<,2/a/>,3/b/>}{%
pcline[ArrowInside=-a](Ii)(Ithenumexpri+1)nbput{$l$}}
endpspicture
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
pnode(0,0){O}
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 135 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l in {0/a,1/b,2/a,3/b}{%
qdisk([nodesep=3.5,angle=-45]{Ii}O){2pt}
psarc{->}(0,0){3.5}{(Ii)}{(Ithenumexpri+1)}
uput{8pt}[{(Ii)}](>Ii){$l$}}
endpspicture
end{document}
Note: ArrowInside
is not available for psarc
. I don't know why.
add a comment |
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes.
documentclass[pstricks,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add}
begin{document}
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 45 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l/a in {0/a/<,1/b/<,2/a/>,3/b/>}{%
pcline[ArrowInside=-a](Ii)(Ithenumexpri+1)nbput{$l$}}
endpspicture
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
pnode(0,0){O}
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 135 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l in {0/a,1/b,2/a,3/b}{%
qdisk([nodesep=3.5,angle=-45]{Ii}O){2pt}
psarc{->}(0,0){3.5}{(Ii)}{(Ithenumexpri+1)}
uput{8pt}[{(Ii)}](>Ii){$l$}}
endpspicture
end{document}
Note: ArrowInside
is not available for psarc
. I don't know why.
add a comment |
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes.
documentclass[pstricks,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add}
begin{document}
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 45 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l/a in {0/a/<,1/b/<,2/a/>,3/b/>}{%
pcline[ArrowInside=-a](Ii)(Ithenumexpri+1)nbput{$l$}}
endpspicture
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
pnode(0,0){O}
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 135 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l in {0/a,1/b,2/a,3/b}{%
qdisk([nodesep=3.5,angle=-45]{Ii}O){2pt}
psarc{->}(0,0){3.5}{(Ii)}{(Ithenumexpri+1)}
uput{8pt}[{(Ii)}](>Ii){$l$}}
endpspicture
end{document}
Note: ArrowInside
is not available for psarc
. I don't know why.
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes.
documentclass[pstricks,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add}
begin{document}
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 45 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l/a in {0/a/<,1/b/<,2/a/>,3/b/>}{%
pcline[ArrowInside=-a](Ii)(Ithenumexpri+1)nbput{$l$}}
endpspicture
pspicture[arrowinset=0,arrowscale=2](-4,-4)(4,4)
pnode(0,0){O}
curvepnodes[plotpoints=5]{0}{360}{3.5 t 135 add PtoC}{I}
foreach i/l in {0/a,1/b,2/a,3/b}{%
qdisk([nodesep=3.5,angle=-45]{Ii}O){2pt}
psarc{->}(0,0){3.5}{(Ii)}{(Ithenumexpri+1)}
uput{8pt}[{(Ii)}](>Ii){$l$}}
endpspicture
end{document}
Note: ArrowInside
is not available for psarc
. I don't know why.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
God Must Be CrazyGod Must Be Crazy
5,85211039
5,85211039
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469051%2ftopology-diagrams-labelled-edges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What have you tried?
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I thought about doing something with tikzpicture and explicitly stating the parametrization of each length but it seems that there ought to be a more elegant way to do it.
– zjs
2 hours ago
1
@zjs Just post what you have got. It will be much easier to see what you want if you post a code example.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago