Will a remastered debian for powerpc still be in the powerpc architecture?












0














I would like to know because I am going to use a power pc mac g5 for making my distribution. I also need to know if it makes my remaster the powerpc architecture and how to change it to 32 or 64-bit if possible.










share|improve this question





























    0














    I would like to know because I am going to use a power pc mac g5 for making my distribution. I also need to know if it makes my remaster the powerpc architecture and how to change it to 32 or 64-bit if possible.










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0


      1





      I would like to know because I am going to use a power pc mac g5 for making my distribution. I also need to know if it makes my remaster the powerpc architecture and how to change it to 32 or 64-bit if possible.










      share|improve this question















      I would like to know because I am going to use a power pc mac g5 for making my distribution. I also need to know if it makes my remaster the powerpc architecture and how to change it to 32 or 64-bit if possible.







      debian powerpc






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 24 '15 at 4:25









      Anthon

      60.3k17102163




      60.3k17102163










      asked Jun 24 '15 at 1:41









      nerd7473nerd7473

      468




      468






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Strictly speaking, if you're creating your own distribution based on Debian, the powerpc architecture can be whatever you want it to be; in Debian it's "only" a name in dpkg's tables.



          If you do change your definition of an architecture though, you'd be better off changing the architecture name; for a good example of what happens when you don't, see Raspbian (where armhf isn't the same as Debian's armhf).



          powerpc in Debian is 32-bit; there's a 64-bit port, ppc64 (and a 64-bit little-endian port, ppc64el, but that's not relevant for a G5). If you want to mix both you'd use multiarch typically.



          So the answer to your question depends on what changes you intend to make in your "remastering"...






          share|improve this answer























          • So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:35










          • You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:38










          • I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:41










          • You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:44










          • I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:45











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211727%2fwill-a-remastered-debian-for-powerpc-still-be-in-the-powerpc-architecture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Strictly speaking, if you're creating your own distribution based on Debian, the powerpc architecture can be whatever you want it to be; in Debian it's "only" a name in dpkg's tables.



          If you do change your definition of an architecture though, you'd be better off changing the architecture name; for a good example of what happens when you don't, see Raspbian (where armhf isn't the same as Debian's armhf).



          powerpc in Debian is 32-bit; there's a 64-bit port, ppc64 (and a 64-bit little-endian port, ppc64el, but that's not relevant for a G5). If you want to mix both you'd use multiarch typically.



          So the answer to your question depends on what changes you intend to make in your "remastering"...






          share|improve this answer























          • So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:35










          • You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:38










          • I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:41










          • You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:44










          • I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:45
















          1














          Strictly speaking, if you're creating your own distribution based on Debian, the powerpc architecture can be whatever you want it to be; in Debian it's "only" a name in dpkg's tables.



          If you do change your definition of an architecture though, you'd be better off changing the architecture name; for a good example of what happens when you don't, see Raspbian (where armhf isn't the same as Debian's armhf).



          powerpc in Debian is 32-bit; there's a 64-bit port, ppc64 (and a 64-bit little-endian port, ppc64el, but that's not relevant for a G5). If you want to mix both you'd use multiarch typically.



          So the answer to your question depends on what changes you intend to make in your "remastering"...






          share|improve this answer























          • So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:35










          • You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:38










          • I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:41










          • You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:44










          • I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:45














          1












          1








          1






          Strictly speaking, if you're creating your own distribution based on Debian, the powerpc architecture can be whatever you want it to be; in Debian it's "only" a name in dpkg's tables.



          If you do change your definition of an architecture though, you'd be better off changing the architecture name; for a good example of what happens when you don't, see Raspbian (where armhf isn't the same as Debian's armhf).



          powerpc in Debian is 32-bit; there's a 64-bit port, ppc64 (and a 64-bit little-endian port, ppc64el, but that's not relevant for a G5). If you want to mix both you'd use multiarch typically.



          So the answer to your question depends on what changes you intend to make in your "remastering"...






          share|improve this answer














          Strictly speaking, if you're creating your own distribution based on Debian, the powerpc architecture can be whatever you want it to be; in Debian it's "only" a name in dpkg's tables.



          If you do change your definition of an architecture though, you'd be better off changing the architecture name; for a good example of what happens when you don't, see Raspbian (where armhf isn't the same as Debian's armhf).



          powerpc in Debian is 32-bit; there's a 64-bit port, ppc64 (and a 64-bit little-endian port, ppc64el, but that's not relevant for a G5). If you want to mix both you'd use multiarch typically.



          So the answer to your question depends on what changes you intend to make in your "remastering"...







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 21 mins ago

























          answered Jun 24 '15 at 9:03









          Stephen KittStephen Kitt

          165k24366446




          165k24366446












          • So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:35










          • You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:38










          • I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:41










          • You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:44










          • I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:45


















          • So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:35










          • You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:38










          • I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:41










          • You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
            – Stephen Kitt
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:44










          • I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
            – nerd7473
            Jun 24 '15 at 9:45
















          So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
          – nerd7473
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:35




          So how do I use Multiarch? Is that the best method?
          – nerd7473
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:35












          You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
          – Stephen Kitt
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:38




          You'll need to explain what you're trying to do in more detail if you want to know what the best method is...
          – Stephen Kitt
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:38












          I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
          – nerd7473
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:41




          I want to make a distro based on debian on a Powerpc and intend to redistribute it with linux live kit but I also want it to be compatible with other computers.
          – nerd7473
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:41












          You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
          – Stephen Kitt
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:44




          You want a single live system which can work on multiple architectures?
          – Stephen Kitt
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:44












          I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
          – nerd7473
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:45




          I actually think that would work better than having one or more archetectures so yes.
          – nerd7473
          Jun 24 '15 at 9:45


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211727%2fwill-a-remastered-debian-for-powerpc-still-be-in-the-powerpc-architecture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          CARDNET

          Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

          濃尾地震