On the board: black king vs. white king with knight and rook. Could checkmate be done without the white...
Just something I randomly came up with. Sorry if it is a duplicate.
theory checkmate
add a comment |
Just something I randomly came up with. Sorry if it is a duplicate.
theory checkmate
Close voters: IMHO (which as always could be wrong) this question is not too broad. It could benefit from a picture, perhaps, but it sounds like a standard endgame-style question. (i.e. "Can King and Rook draw vs King and Queen?"). The location of the pieces is assumed to not have any immediate tactics.
– Brandon_J
19 mins ago
add a comment |
Just something I randomly came up with. Sorry if it is a duplicate.
theory checkmate
Just something I randomly came up with. Sorry if it is a duplicate.
theory checkmate
theory checkmate
edited 6 hours ago
Brian Towers
15.5k32967
15.5k32967
asked 7 hours ago
Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay
309212
309212
Close voters: IMHO (which as always could be wrong) this question is not too broad. It could benefit from a picture, perhaps, but it sounds like a standard endgame-style question. (i.e. "Can King and Rook draw vs King and Queen?"). The location of the pieces is assumed to not have any immediate tactics.
– Brandon_J
19 mins ago
add a comment |
Close voters: IMHO (which as always could be wrong) this question is not too broad. It could benefit from a picture, perhaps, but it sounds like a standard endgame-style question. (i.e. "Can King and Rook draw vs King and Queen?"). The location of the pieces is assumed to not have any immediate tactics.
– Brandon_J
19 mins ago
Close voters: IMHO (which as always could be wrong) this question is not too broad. It could benefit from a picture, perhaps, but it sounds like a standard endgame-style question. (i.e. "Can King and Rook draw vs King and Queen?"). The location of the pieces is assumed to not have any immediate tactics.
– Brandon_J
19 mins ago
Close voters: IMHO (which as always could be wrong) this question is not too broad. It could benefit from a picture, perhaps, but it sounds like a standard endgame-style question. (i.e. "Can King and Rook draw vs King and Queen?"). The location of the pieces is assumed to not have any immediate tactics.
– Brandon_J
19 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I don't think it is possible to forcibly mate the king with rook and knight only.
Proof: The only mating position is with the black king in a corner, the rook giving check from an adjecent square and the knight protecting the rook and covering the escape square.
For simplicity let's say Ka1, Rb1, Nc3. There are 7 other equivalent positions to this one.
If you retro-analyze the position the last move must have been with the rook along the b file from somewhere between b3 and b8. For the folowing analysis it does not matter from where it came.
Then what was black's last move? It certainly was a king move moving from a2, b2 or b1 to the corner (a1). However, since black was not forced to move the king to the corner but could have moved to a3 or c1 (or to b3 if the rook was standing there), the mate cannot be forced.
2
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23805%2fon-the-board-black-king-vs-white-king-with-knight-and-rook-could-checkmate-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think it is possible to forcibly mate the king with rook and knight only.
Proof: The only mating position is with the black king in a corner, the rook giving check from an adjecent square and the knight protecting the rook and covering the escape square.
For simplicity let's say Ka1, Rb1, Nc3. There are 7 other equivalent positions to this one.
If you retro-analyze the position the last move must have been with the rook along the b file from somewhere between b3 and b8. For the folowing analysis it does not matter from where it came.
Then what was black's last move? It certainly was a king move moving from a2, b2 or b1 to the corner (a1). However, since black was not forced to move the king to the corner but could have moved to a3 or c1 (or to b3 if the rook was standing there), the mate cannot be forced.
2
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think it is possible to forcibly mate the king with rook and knight only.
Proof: The only mating position is with the black king in a corner, the rook giving check from an adjecent square and the knight protecting the rook and covering the escape square.
For simplicity let's say Ka1, Rb1, Nc3. There are 7 other equivalent positions to this one.
If you retro-analyze the position the last move must have been with the rook along the b file from somewhere between b3 and b8. For the folowing analysis it does not matter from where it came.
Then what was black's last move? It certainly was a king move moving from a2, b2 or b1 to the corner (a1). However, since black was not forced to move the king to the corner but could have moved to a3 or c1 (or to b3 if the rook was standing there), the mate cannot be forced.
2
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think it is possible to forcibly mate the king with rook and knight only.
Proof: The only mating position is with the black king in a corner, the rook giving check from an adjecent square and the knight protecting the rook and covering the escape square.
For simplicity let's say Ka1, Rb1, Nc3. There are 7 other equivalent positions to this one.
If you retro-analyze the position the last move must have been with the rook along the b file from somewhere between b3 and b8. For the folowing analysis it does not matter from where it came.
Then what was black's last move? It certainly was a king move moving from a2, b2 or b1 to the corner (a1). However, since black was not forced to move the king to the corner but could have moved to a3 or c1 (or to b3 if the rook was standing there), the mate cannot be forced.
I don't think it is possible to forcibly mate the king with rook and knight only.
Proof: The only mating position is with the black king in a corner, the rook giving check from an adjecent square and the knight protecting the rook and covering the escape square.
For simplicity let's say Ka1, Rb1, Nc3. There are 7 other equivalent positions to this one.
If you retro-analyze the position the last move must have been with the rook along the b file from somewhere between b3 and b8. For the folowing analysis it does not matter from where it came.
Then what was black's last move? It certainly was a king move moving from a2, b2 or b1 to the corner (a1). However, since black was not forced to move the king to the corner but could have moved to a3 or c1 (or to b3 if the rook was standing there), the mate cannot be forced.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
user1583209user1583209
12.2k21554
12.2k21554
2
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
2
2
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
For completeness, I guess you have to analyze the possibility that the rook came from b3 preventing Ka3. Of course, then Kxb3 would have been possible.
– D M
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23805%2fon-the-board-black-king-vs-white-king-with-knight-and-rook-could-checkmate-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Close voters: IMHO (which as always could be wrong) this question is not too broad. It could benefit from a picture, perhaps, but it sounds like a standard endgame-style question. (i.e. "Can King and Rook draw vs King and Queen?"). The location of the pieces is assumed to not have any immediate tactics.
– Brandon_J
19 mins ago