Find if a list is an ABC-triple












13














Three positive integers A, B, C are ABC-triple if they are coprime,
with A < B and satisfying the relation : A + B = C



Examples :





  • 1, 8, 9 is an ABC-triple since they are coprime, 1 < 8 and 1 + 8 = 9


  • 6, 8, 14 is not because they are not coprime


  • 7, 5, 12 is not because 7 > 5


You can see this Frits Beukers 2005 presentation for more details about ABC-triples.



Input/Output



Three integers, decimal written. May be separated values or
list. Output had to be a truthy/falsy value whether the three
integers are an ABC-triple.



Note: It is important to respect integers order in the list, for example: 1, 8, 9 is not considered as the same list as 9, 1, 8 or any other combination. So first is an ABC-triple and second is not.



Thus A is the first element of the list, B the second and C the third.



Test cases



Each of the following lists should output a truthy value



[1, 8, 9]
[2, 3, 5]
[2, 6436341, 6436343]
[4, 121, 125]
[121, 48234375, 48234496]


Each of the following lists should output a falsey value



[1, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 5]
[1, 9, 8]
[4, 12872682, 12872686]
[6, 8, 14]
[7, 5, 12]









share|improve this question
























  • Does the output have to be only one of two values, or can we output different truthy/falsy values for different inputs?
    – Luis Mendo
    8 hours ago










  • I think it should be consistent: your code have to output one kind of truthy/falsy values whatever the input. But the truthy/falsy couple can be what you want as far as it does the job: differentiate lists.
    – david
    7 hours ago












  • If we take the input as list of three values, does the input have to be in the order [A,B,C], or are we also allowed to take the input in the order [C,B,A] or [C,A,B]?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    7 hours ago










  • You have to respect order since A < B is a criteria in the challenge.
    – david
    7 hours ago










  • @david A < B can still be respected when we take the input list in the order [C,A,B]. ;) But ok, perhaps it's indeed best to leave the input-order for lists-input as [A,B,C] to reduce confusion.
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    6 hours ago
















13














Three positive integers A, B, C are ABC-triple if they are coprime,
with A < B and satisfying the relation : A + B = C



Examples :





  • 1, 8, 9 is an ABC-triple since they are coprime, 1 < 8 and 1 + 8 = 9


  • 6, 8, 14 is not because they are not coprime


  • 7, 5, 12 is not because 7 > 5


You can see this Frits Beukers 2005 presentation for more details about ABC-triples.



Input/Output



Three integers, decimal written. May be separated values or
list. Output had to be a truthy/falsy value whether the three
integers are an ABC-triple.



Note: It is important to respect integers order in the list, for example: 1, 8, 9 is not considered as the same list as 9, 1, 8 or any other combination. So first is an ABC-triple and second is not.



Thus A is the first element of the list, B the second and C the third.



Test cases



Each of the following lists should output a truthy value



[1, 8, 9]
[2, 3, 5]
[2, 6436341, 6436343]
[4, 121, 125]
[121, 48234375, 48234496]


Each of the following lists should output a falsey value



[1, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 5]
[1, 9, 8]
[4, 12872682, 12872686]
[6, 8, 14]
[7, 5, 12]









share|improve this question
























  • Does the output have to be only one of two values, or can we output different truthy/falsy values for different inputs?
    – Luis Mendo
    8 hours ago










  • I think it should be consistent: your code have to output one kind of truthy/falsy values whatever the input. But the truthy/falsy couple can be what you want as far as it does the job: differentiate lists.
    – david
    7 hours ago












  • If we take the input as list of three values, does the input have to be in the order [A,B,C], or are we also allowed to take the input in the order [C,B,A] or [C,A,B]?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    7 hours ago










  • You have to respect order since A < B is a criteria in the challenge.
    – david
    7 hours ago










  • @david A < B can still be respected when we take the input list in the order [C,A,B]. ;) But ok, perhaps it's indeed best to leave the input-order for lists-input as [A,B,C] to reduce confusion.
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    6 hours ago














13












13








13







Three positive integers A, B, C are ABC-triple if they are coprime,
with A < B and satisfying the relation : A + B = C



Examples :





  • 1, 8, 9 is an ABC-triple since they are coprime, 1 < 8 and 1 + 8 = 9


  • 6, 8, 14 is not because they are not coprime


  • 7, 5, 12 is not because 7 > 5


You can see this Frits Beukers 2005 presentation for more details about ABC-triples.



Input/Output



Three integers, decimal written. May be separated values or
list. Output had to be a truthy/falsy value whether the three
integers are an ABC-triple.



Note: It is important to respect integers order in the list, for example: 1, 8, 9 is not considered as the same list as 9, 1, 8 or any other combination. So first is an ABC-triple and second is not.



Thus A is the first element of the list, B the second and C the third.



Test cases



Each of the following lists should output a truthy value



[1, 8, 9]
[2, 3, 5]
[2, 6436341, 6436343]
[4, 121, 125]
[121, 48234375, 48234496]


Each of the following lists should output a falsey value



[1, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 5]
[1, 9, 8]
[4, 12872682, 12872686]
[6, 8, 14]
[7, 5, 12]









share|improve this question















Three positive integers A, B, C are ABC-triple if they are coprime,
with A < B and satisfying the relation : A + B = C



Examples :





  • 1, 8, 9 is an ABC-triple since they are coprime, 1 < 8 and 1 + 8 = 9


  • 6, 8, 14 is not because they are not coprime


  • 7, 5, 12 is not because 7 > 5


You can see this Frits Beukers 2005 presentation for more details about ABC-triples.



Input/Output



Three integers, decimal written. May be separated values or
list. Output had to be a truthy/falsy value whether the three
integers are an ABC-triple.



Note: It is important to respect integers order in the list, for example: 1, 8, 9 is not considered as the same list as 9, 1, 8 or any other combination. So first is an ABC-triple and second is not.



Thus A is the first element of the list, B the second and C the third.



Test cases



Each of the following lists should output a truthy value



[1, 8, 9]
[2, 3, 5]
[2, 6436341, 6436343]
[4, 121, 125]
[121, 48234375, 48234496]


Each of the following lists should output a falsey value



[1, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 5]
[1, 9, 8]
[4, 12872682, 12872686]
[6, 8, 14]
[7, 5, 12]






code-golf sequence decision-problem number-theory






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago

























asked 8 hours ago









david

199110




199110












  • Does the output have to be only one of two values, or can we output different truthy/falsy values for different inputs?
    – Luis Mendo
    8 hours ago










  • I think it should be consistent: your code have to output one kind of truthy/falsy values whatever the input. But the truthy/falsy couple can be what you want as far as it does the job: differentiate lists.
    – david
    7 hours ago












  • If we take the input as list of three values, does the input have to be in the order [A,B,C], or are we also allowed to take the input in the order [C,B,A] or [C,A,B]?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    7 hours ago










  • You have to respect order since A < B is a criteria in the challenge.
    – david
    7 hours ago










  • @david A < B can still be respected when we take the input list in the order [C,A,B]. ;) But ok, perhaps it's indeed best to leave the input-order for lists-input as [A,B,C] to reduce confusion.
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    6 hours ago


















  • Does the output have to be only one of two values, or can we output different truthy/falsy values for different inputs?
    – Luis Mendo
    8 hours ago










  • I think it should be consistent: your code have to output one kind of truthy/falsy values whatever the input. But the truthy/falsy couple can be what you want as far as it does the job: differentiate lists.
    – david
    7 hours ago












  • If we take the input as list of three values, does the input have to be in the order [A,B,C], or are we also allowed to take the input in the order [C,B,A] or [C,A,B]?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    7 hours ago










  • You have to respect order since A < B is a criteria in the challenge.
    – david
    7 hours ago










  • @david A < B can still be respected when we take the input list in the order [C,A,B]. ;) But ok, perhaps it's indeed best to leave the input-order for lists-input as [A,B,C] to reduce confusion.
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    6 hours ago
















Does the output have to be only one of two values, or can we output different truthy/falsy values for different inputs?
– Luis Mendo
8 hours ago




Does the output have to be only one of two values, or can we output different truthy/falsy values for different inputs?
– Luis Mendo
8 hours ago












I think it should be consistent: your code have to output one kind of truthy/falsy values whatever the input. But the truthy/falsy couple can be what you want as far as it does the job: differentiate lists.
– david
7 hours ago






I think it should be consistent: your code have to output one kind of truthy/falsy values whatever the input. But the truthy/falsy couple can be what you want as far as it does the job: differentiate lists.
– david
7 hours ago














If we take the input as list of three values, does the input have to be in the order [A,B,C], or are we also allowed to take the input in the order [C,B,A] or [C,A,B]?
– Kevin Cruijssen
7 hours ago




If we take the input as list of three values, does the input have to be in the order [A,B,C], or are we also allowed to take the input in the order [C,B,A] or [C,A,B]?
– Kevin Cruijssen
7 hours ago












You have to respect order since A < B is a criteria in the challenge.
– david
7 hours ago




You have to respect order since A < B is a criteria in the challenge.
– david
7 hours ago












@david A < B can still be respected when we take the input list in the order [C,A,B]. ;) But ok, perhaps it's indeed best to leave the input-order for lists-input as [A,B,C] to reduce confusion.
– Kevin Cruijssen
6 hours ago




@david A < B can still be respected when we take the input list in the order [C,A,B]. ;) But ok, perhaps it's indeed best to leave the input-order for lists-input as [A,B,C] to reduce confusion.
– Kevin Cruijssen
6 hours ago










18 Answers
18






active

oldest

votes


















7















Jelly, 10 9 bytes



Ṫ=S×</=g/


Try it online!



How it works



Ṫ=S×</=g/  Main link. Argument: [a, b, c] (positive integers)

Ṫ Tail; pop and yield c.
S Take the sum of [a, b], yielding (a + b).
= Yield t := (c == a + b).
</ Reduce by less than, yielding (a < b).
× Multiply, yielding t(a < b).
g/ Reduce by GCD, yielding gcd(a, b).
= Check if t(a < b) == gcd(a, b).





share|improve this answer































    5















    Perl 6, 33 bytes





    {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}


    Try it online!



    Anonymous code block that takes a list of three numbers and returns True or False.



    Explanation



    {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}
    { } # Anonymous code block
    [gcd] $_ # Is the gcd of all the numbers
    ( )== # Equal to
    .sum # Whether the sum of numbes
    == # Is equal to
    .[2]*2 # The last element doubled
    *[<] $_ # And elements are in ascending order





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      32 bytes
      – nwellnhof
      6 hours ago



















    5















    Haskell, 48 38 29 bytes





    -10 bytes due to TFeld's gcd trick!



    -7 bytes thanks to HPWiz for improving the co-primality test and spotting a superfluous space!



    -2 bytes thanks to nimi for suggesting an infix-operator!



    (a!b)c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


    Try it online!



    Explanation



    The first two conditions a < b and a + b == c are fairly obvious, the third one uses that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c) = gcd(b,c)$:



    Writing $gcd(a,c) = U cdot a + V cdot c$ using Bézout's identity and substituting $c = a + b$ gives:



    $$
    U cdot a + V cdot (a + b) = (U + V) cdot a + V cdot b
    $$



    Since the $gcd$ is the minimal positive solution to that identity it follows that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c)$. The other case is symmetric.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Looks like you forgot to remove a space
      – H.PWiz
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
      – H.PWiz
      6 hours ago












    • @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
      – BMO
      6 hours ago



















    4














    Java 10, 65 64 bytes





    (a,b,c)->{var r=a<b&a+b==c;for(;b>0;a=b,b=c)c=a%b;return r&a<2;}


    -1 byte thank to @Shaggy.



    Try it online.



    Explanation:



    (a,b,c)->{        // Method with three integer parameters and boolean return-type
    var r= // Result-boolean, starting at:
    a<b // Check if `a` is smaller than `b`
    &a+b==c; // And if `a+b` is equal to `c`
    for(;b>0 // Then loop as long as `b` is not 0 yet
    ; // After every iteration:
    a=b, // Set `a` to the current `b`
    b=c) // And set `b` to the temp value `c`
    c=a%b; // Set the temp value `c` to `a` modulo-`b`
    // (we no longer need `c` at this point)
    return r // Return if the boolean-result is true
    &a<2;} // And `a` is now smaller than 2





    share|improve this answer























    • a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
      – Shaggy
      5 hours ago










    • @Shaggy Thanks!
      – Kevin Cruijssen
      3 hours ago



















    4















    05AB1E, 12 11 10 bytes



    Saved 1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen



    ÂÆ_*`‹*¿Θ


    Try it online!
    or as a Test Suite



    Explanation



    ÂÆ           # reduce a reversed copy of the input by subtraction
    _ # logically negate
    * # multiply with input
    ` # push the values of the resulting list separately to stack
    # remove the top (last) value
    ‹ # is a < b ?
    * # multiply by the input list
    ¿ # calculate the gcd of the result
    Θ # is it true ?





    share|improve this answer























    • Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
      – Kevin Cruijssen
      5 hours ago










    • @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
      – Emigna
      3 hours ago



















    3















    Japt, 16 14 13 11 bytes



    <V¥yU «NÔr-


    Try it



                    :Implicit input of integers U=A, V=B & W=C
    <V :Is U less than V?
    ¥ :Test that for equality with
    yU :The GCD of V & U
    « :Logical AND with the negation of
    N :The array of inputs
    Ô :Reversed
    r- :Reduced by subtraction





    share|improve this answer























    • Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
      – Kamil Drakari
      4 hours ago










    • @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
      – Shaggy
      2 hours ago



















    3














    JavaScript (ES6),  54 43 42  40 bytes



    Thanks to @Shaggy for pointing out that we don't need to compute $gcd(a,c)$. Saved 11 bytes by rewriting the code accordingly.



    Takes input as 3 separate integers. Returns $true$ for an ABC-triple, or either $0$ or $false$ otherwise.





    f=(a,b,c)=>c&&a/b|a+b-c?0:b?f(b,a%b):a<2


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
      – Shaggy
      4 hours ago










    • @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
      – Arnauld
      4 hours ago



















    2














    Excel, 33 bytes



    =AND(A1+B1=C1,GCD(A1:C1)=1,A1<B1)





    share|improve this answer





























      2















      Python 2, 69 67 63 62 55 bytes





      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)/gcd(a,b)
      from fractions import*


      Try it online!






      Python 3, 58 51 bytes





      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)==gcd(a,b)
      from math import*


      Try it online!





      -7 bytes, thanks to H.PWiz






      share|improve this answer























      • is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
        – Jo King
        7 hours ago






      • 2




        @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
        – david
        7 hours ago






      • 2




        @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
        – BMO
        7 hours ago










      • You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
        – H.PWiz
        6 hours ago










      • @H.PWiz Thanks :)
        – TFeld
        5 hours ago



















      2














      bash, 61 bytes





      factor $@|grep -vzP '( .+b).*n.*1b'&&(($1<$2&&$1+$2==$3))


      Try it online!



      Input as command line arguments,
      output in the exit code
      (also produces output on stdout as a side effect, but this can be ignored).



      The second part (starting from &&(() is pretty standard,
      but the interesting bit is the coprime test:



      factor $@      # produces output of the form "6: 2 3n8: 2 2 2n14: 2 7n"
      |grep - # regex search on the result
      v # invert the match (return truthy for strings that don't match)
      z # zero-terminated, allowing us to match newlines
      P # perl (extended) regex
      '( .+b)' # match one or more full factors
      '.*n.*' # and somewhere on the next line...
      '1b' # find the same full factors





      share|improve this answer





























        2















        C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 59 bytes





        (a,b,c)=>Enumerable.Range(2,a).All(i=>a%i+b%i>0)&a<b&a+b==c


        Try it online!






        share|improve this answer































          1















          J, 27 bytes



          (+/=2*{:)*({.<1{])*1=+./ .*


          Try it online!



          Inspired by Jo King's Perl solution






          share|improve this answer































            1















            Pari/GP, 32 bytes



            (a,b,c)->gcd(a,b)<2&&a<b&&a+b==c


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer





























              1















              C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 90 bytes





              n=>new int[(int)1e8].Where((_,b)=>n[0]%++b<1&n[1]%b<1).Count()<2&n[0]+n[1]==n[2]&n[0]<n[1]


              Runs for numbers up to 1e8, takes about 35 seconds on my machine. Instead of calculating the gcd like others, the function just instantiate a huge array and filter the indexes that aren't divisors of a or b, and check how many elements are left. Next it check if element one plus element two equals element three. Lastly, it checks if the first element is less than the second.



              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer





























                1















                C# (.NET Core), 68 bytes



                Without Linq.





                (a,b,c)=>{var t=a<b&a+b==c;while(b>0){c=b;b=a%b;a=c;}return t&a<2;};


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer





























                  1















                  Stax, 12 bytes



                  ü╡v╕7+Pü°╔|g


                  Run and debug it






                  share|improve this answer





























                    1














                    Wolfram Language 24 30 28 bytes



                    With 2 bytes saved by Doorknob,



                    #<#2&&CoprimeQ@##&&#+#2==#3&





                    share|improve this answer























                    • Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                      – DavidC
                      3 hours ago












                    • I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                      – Doorknob
                      3 hours ago










                    • @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                      – DavidC
                      2 hours ago










                    • They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                      – Doorknob
                      2 hours ago





















                    0















                    Clean, 43 bytes



                    import StdEnv
                    $a b c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                    Try it online!



                    Similar to basically everything else because the direct test is the same.






                    share|improve this answer





















                      Your Answer





                      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                      });
                      });
                      }, "mathjax-editing");

                      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                      StackExchange.snippets.init();
                      });
                      });
                      }, "code-snippets");

                      StackExchange.ready(function() {
                      var channelOptions = {
                      tags: "".split(" "),
                      id: "200"
                      };
                      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                      createEditor();
                      });
                      }
                      else {
                      createEditor();
                      }
                      });

                      function createEditor() {
                      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                      heartbeatType: 'answer',
                      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                      convertImagesToLinks: false,
                      noModals: true,
                      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                      reputationToPostImages: null,
                      bindNavPrevention: true,
                      postfix: "",
                      imageUploader: {
                      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                      allowUrls: true
                      },
                      onDemand: true,
                      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                      });


                      }
                      });














                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f178303%2ffind-if-a-list-is-an-abc-triple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown

























                      18 Answers
                      18






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes








                      18 Answers
                      18






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes









                      active

                      oldest

                      votes






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes









                      7















                      Jelly, 10 9 bytes



                      Ṫ=S×</=g/


                      Try it online!



                      How it works



                      Ṫ=S×</=g/  Main link. Argument: [a, b, c] (positive integers)

                      Ṫ Tail; pop and yield c.
                      S Take the sum of [a, b], yielding (a + b).
                      = Yield t := (c == a + b).
                      </ Reduce by less than, yielding (a < b).
                      × Multiply, yielding t(a < b).
                      g/ Reduce by GCD, yielding gcd(a, b).
                      = Check if t(a < b) == gcd(a, b).





                      share|improve this answer




























                        7















                        Jelly, 10 9 bytes



                        Ṫ=S×</=g/


                        Try it online!



                        How it works



                        Ṫ=S×</=g/  Main link. Argument: [a, b, c] (positive integers)

                        Ṫ Tail; pop and yield c.
                        S Take the sum of [a, b], yielding (a + b).
                        = Yield t := (c == a + b).
                        </ Reduce by less than, yielding (a < b).
                        × Multiply, yielding t(a < b).
                        g/ Reduce by GCD, yielding gcd(a, b).
                        = Check if t(a < b) == gcd(a, b).





                        share|improve this answer


























                          7












                          7








                          7







                          Jelly, 10 9 bytes



                          Ṫ=S×</=g/


                          Try it online!



                          How it works



                          Ṫ=S×</=g/  Main link. Argument: [a, b, c] (positive integers)

                          Ṫ Tail; pop and yield c.
                          S Take the sum of [a, b], yielding (a + b).
                          = Yield t := (c == a + b).
                          </ Reduce by less than, yielding (a < b).
                          × Multiply, yielding t(a < b).
                          g/ Reduce by GCD, yielding gcd(a, b).
                          = Check if t(a < b) == gcd(a, b).





                          share|improve this answer















                          Jelly, 10 9 bytes



                          Ṫ=S×</=g/


                          Try it online!



                          How it works



                          Ṫ=S×</=g/  Main link. Argument: [a, b, c] (positive integers)

                          Ṫ Tail; pop and yield c.
                          S Take the sum of [a, b], yielding (a + b).
                          = Yield t := (c == a + b).
                          </ Reduce by less than, yielding (a < b).
                          × Multiply, yielding t(a < b).
                          g/ Reduce by GCD, yielding gcd(a, b).
                          = Check if t(a < b) == gcd(a, b).






                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 3 hours ago

























                          answered 6 hours ago









                          Dennis

                          186k32296735




                          186k32296735























                              5















                              Perl 6, 33 bytes





                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}


                              Try it online!



                              Anonymous code block that takes a list of three numbers and returns True or False.



                              Explanation



                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}
                              { } # Anonymous code block
                              [gcd] $_ # Is the gcd of all the numbers
                              ( )== # Equal to
                              .sum # Whether the sum of numbes
                              == # Is equal to
                              .[2]*2 # The last element doubled
                              *[<] $_ # And elements are in ascending order





                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                32 bytes
                                – nwellnhof
                                6 hours ago
















                              5















                              Perl 6, 33 bytes





                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}


                              Try it online!



                              Anonymous code block that takes a list of three numbers and returns True or False.



                              Explanation



                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}
                              { } # Anonymous code block
                              [gcd] $_ # Is the gcd of all the numbers
                              ( )== # Equal to
                              .sum # Whether the sum of numbes
                              == # Is equal to
                              .[2]*2 # The last element doubled
                              *[<] $_ # And elements are in ascending order





                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                32 bytes
                                – nwellnhof
                                6 hours ago














                              5












                              5








                              5







                              Perl 6, 33 bytes





                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}


                              Try it online!



                              Anonymous code block that takes a list of three numbers and returns True or False.



                              Explanation



                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}
                              { } # Anonymous code block
                              [gcd] $_ # Is the gcd of all the numbers
                              ( )== # Equal to
                              .sum # Whether the sum of numbes
                              == # Is equal to
                              .[2]*2 # The last element doubled
                              *[<] $_ # And elements are in ascending order





                              share|improve this answer















                              Perl 6, 33 bytes





                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}


                              Try it online!



                              Anonymous code block that takes a list of three numbers and returns True or False.



                              Explanation



                              {(.sum==.[2]*2*[<] $_)==[gcd] $_}
                              { } # Anonymous code block
                              [gcd] $_ # Is the gcd of all the numbers
                              ( )== # Equal to
                              .sum # Whether the sum of numbes
                              == # Is equal to
                              .[2]*2 # The last element doubled
                              *[<] $_ # And elements are in ascending order






                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 7 hours ago

























                              answered 7 hours ago









                              Jo King

                              20.9k248110




                              20.9k248110








                              • 1




                                32 bytes
                                – nwellnhof
                                6 hours ago














                              • 1




                                32 bytes
                                – nwellnhof
                                6 hours ago








                              1




                              1




                              32 bytes
                              – nwellnhof
                              6 hours ago




                              32 bytes
                              – nwellnhof
                              6 hours ago











                              5















                              Haskell, 48 38 29 bytes





                              -10 bytes due to TFeld's gcd trick!



                              -7 bytes thanks to HPWiz for improving the co-primality test and spotting a superfluous space!



                              -2 bytes thanks to nimi for suggesting an infix-operator!



                              (a!b)c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation



                              The first two conditions a < b and a + b == c are fairly obvious, the third one uses that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c) = gcd(b,c)$:



                              Writing $gcd(a,c) = U cdot a + V cdot c$ using Bézout's identity and substituting $c = a + b$ gives:



                              $$
                              U cdot a + V cdot (a + b) = (U + V) cdot a + V cdot b
                              $$



                              Since the $gcd$ is the minimal positive solution to that identity it follows that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c)$. The other case is symmetric.






                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                Looks like you forgot to remove a space
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago






                              • 1




                                Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago












                              • @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
                                – BMO
                                6 hours ago
















                              5















                              Haskell, 48 38 29 bytes





                              -10 bytes due to TFeld's gcd trick!



                              -7 bytes thanks to HPWiz for improving the co-primality test and spotting a superfluous space!



                              -2 bytes thanks to nimi for suggesting an infix-operator!



                              (a!b)c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation



                              The first two conditions a < b and a + b == c are fairly obvious, the third one uses that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c) = gcd(b,c)$:



                              Writing $gcd(a,c) = U cdot a + V cdot c$ using Bézout's identity and substituting $c = a + b$ gives:



                              $$
                              U cdot a + V cdot (a + b) = (U + V) cdot a + V cdot b
                              $$



                              Since the $gcd$ is the minimal positive solution to that identity it follows that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c)$. The other case is symmetric.






                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                Looks like you forgot to remove a space
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago






                              • 1




                                Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago












                              • @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
                                – BMO
                                6 hours ago














                              5












                              5








                              5







                              Haskell, 48 38 29 bytes





                              -10 bytes due to TFeld's gcd trick!



                              -7 bytes thanks to HPWiz for improving the co-primality test and spotting a superfluous space!



                              -2 bytes thanks to nimi for suggesting an infix-operator!



                              (a!b)c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation



                              The first two conditions a < b and a + b == c are fairly obvious, the third one uses that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c) = gcd(b,c)$:



                              Writing $gcd(a,c) = U cdot a + V cdot c$ using Bézout's identity and substituting $c = a + b$ gives:



                              $$
                              U cdot a + V cdot (a + b) = (U + V) cdot a + V cdot b
                              $$



                              Since the $gcd$ is the minimal positive solution to that identity it follows that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c)$. The other case is symmetric.






                              share|improve this answer















                              Haskell, 48 38 29 bytes





                              -10 bytes due to TFeld's gcd trick!



                              -7 bytes thanks to HPWiz for improving the co-primality test and spotting a superfluous space!



                              -2 bytes thanks to nimi for suggesting an infix-operator!



                              (a!b)c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation



                              The first two conditions a < b and a + b == c are fairly obvious, the third one uses that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c) = gcd(b,c)$:



                              Writing $gcd(a,c) = U cdot a + V cdot c$ using Bézout's identity and substituting $c = a + b$ gives:



                              $$
                              U cdot a + V cdot (a + b) = (U + V) cdot a + V cdot b
                              $$



                              Since the $gcd$ is the minimal positive solution to that identity it follows that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c)$. The other case is symmetric.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 2 hours ago

























                              answered 7 hours ago









                              BMO

                              11.5k22187




                              11.5k22187








                              • 1




                                Looks like you forgot to remove a space
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago






                              • 1




                                Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago












                              • @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
                                – BMO
                                6 hours ago














                              • 1




                                Looks like you forgot to remove a space
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago






                              • 1




                                Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
                                – H.PWiz
                                6 hours ago












                              • @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
                                – BMO
                                6 hours ago








                              1




                              1




                              Looks like you forgot to remove a space
                              – H.PWiz
                              6 hours ago




                              Looks like you forgot to remove a space
                              – H.PWiz
                              6 hours ago




                              1




                              1




                              Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
                              – H.PWiz
                              6 hours ago






                              Also, I believe you only need that gcd a b==1. Since gcd a b divides a+b=c. i.e gcd(gcd a b)c=gcd a b
                              – H.PWiz
                              6 hours ago














                              @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
                              – BMO
                              6 hours ago




                              @HPWiz: Ah yes,of course, thanks! Will edit later when not on mobile..
                              – BMO
                              6 hours ago











                              4














                              Java 10, 65 64 bytes





                              (a,b,c)->{var r=a<b&a+b==c;for(;b>0;a=b,b=c)c=a%b;return r&a<2;}


                              -1 byte thank to @Shaggy.



                              Try it online.



                              Explanation:



                              (a,b,c)->{        // Method with three integer parameters and boolean return-type
                              var r= // Result-boolean, starting at:
                              a<b // Check if `a` is smaller than `b`
                              &a+b==c; // And if `a+b` is equal to `c`
                              for(;b>0 // Then loop as long as `b` is not 0 yet
                              ; // After every iteration:
                              a=b, // Set `a` to the current `b`
                              b=c) // And set `b` to the temp value `c`
                              c=a%b; // Set the temp value `c` to `a` modulo-`b`
                              // (we no longer need `c` at this point)
                              return r // Return if the boolean-result is true
                              &a<2;} // And `a` is now smaller than 2





                              share|improve this answer























                              • a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
                                – Shaggy
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks!
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                3 hours ago
















                              4














                              Java 10, 65 64 bytes





                              (a,b,c)->{var r=a<b&a+b==c;for(;b>0;a=b,b=c)c=a%b;return r&a<2;}


                              -1 byte thank to @Shaggy.



                              Try it online.



                              Explanation:



                              (a,b,c)->{        // Method with three integer parameters and boolean return-type
                              var r= // Result-boolean, starting at:
                              a<b // Check if `a` is smaller than `b`
                              &a+b==c; // And if `a+b` is equal to `c`
                              for(;b>0 // Then loop as long as `b` is not 0 yet
                              ; // After every iteration:
                              a=b, // Set `a` to the current `b`
                              b=c) // And set `b` to the temp value `c`
                              c=a%b; // Set the temp value `c` to `a` modulo-`b`
                              // (we no longer need `c` at this point)
                              return r // Return if the boolean-result is true
                              &a<2;} // And `a` is now smaller than 2





                              share|improve this answer























                              • a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
                                – Shaggy
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks!
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                3 hours ago














                              4












                              4








                              4






                              Java 10, 65 64 bytes





                              (a,b,c)->{var r=a<b&a+b==c;for(;b>0;a=b,b=c)c=a%b;return r&a<2;}


                              -1 byte thank to @Shaggy.



                              Try it online.



                              Explanation:



                              (a,b,c)->{        // Method with three integer parameters and boolean return-type
                              var r= // Result-boolean, starting at:
                              a<b // Check if `a` is smaller than `b`
                              &a+b==c; // And if `a+b` is equal to `c`
                              for(;b>0 // Then loop as long as `b` is not 0 yet
                              ; // After every iteration:
                              a=b, // Set `a` to the current `b`
                              b=c) // And set `b` to the temp value `c`
                              c=a%b; // Set the temp value `c` to `a` modulo-`b`
                              // (we no longer need `c` at this point)
                              return r // Return if the boolean-result is true
                              &a<2;} // And `a` is now smaller than 2





                              share|improve this answer














                              Java 10, 65 64 bytes





                              (a,b,c)->{var r=a<b&a+b==c;for(;b>0;a=b,b=c)c=a%b;return r&a<2;}


                              -1 byte thank to @Shaggy.



                              Try it online.



                              Explanation:



                              (a,b,c)->{        // Method with three integer parameters and boolean return-type
                              var r= // Result-boolean, starting at:
                              a<b // Check if `a` is smaller than `b`
                              &a+b==c; // And if `a+b` is equal to `c`
                              for(;b>0 // Then loop as long as `b` is not 0 yet
                              ; // After every iteration:
                              a=b, // Set `a` to the current `b`
                              b=c) // And set `b` to the temp value `c`
                              c=a%b; // Set the temp value `c` to `a` modulo-`b`
                              // (we no longer need `c` at this point)
                              return r // Return if the boolean-result is true
                              &a<2;} // And `a` is now smaller than 2






                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 3 hours ago

























                              answered 5 hours ago









                              Kevin Cruijssen

                              35.7k554187




                              35.7k554187












                              • a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
                                – Shaggy
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks!
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                3 hours ago


















                              • a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
                                – Shaggy
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks!
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                3 hours ago
















                              a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
                              – Shaggy
                              5 hours ago




                              a==1 -> a<2 to save a byte.
                              – Shaggy
                              5 hours ago












                              @Shaggy Thanks!
                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                              3 hours ago




                              @Shaggy Thanks!
                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                              3 hours ago











                              4















                              05AB1E, 12 11 10 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen



                              ÂÆ_*`‹*¿Θ


                              Try it online!
                              or as a Test Suite



                              Explanation



                              ÂÆ           # reduce a reversed copy of the input by subtraction
                              _ # logically negate
                              * # multiply with input
                              ` # push the values of the resulting list separately to stack
                              # remove the top (last) value
                              ‹ # is a < b ?
                              * # multiply by the input list
                              ¿ # calculate the gcd of the result
                              Θ # is it true ?





                              share|improve this answer























                              • Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                5 hours ago










                              • @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
                                – Emigna
                                3 hours ago
















                              4















                              05AB1E, 12 11 10 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen



                              ÂÆ_*`‹*¿Θ


                              Try it online!
                              or as a Test Suite



                              Explanation



                              ÂÆ           # reduce a reversed copy of the input by subtraction
                              _ # logically negate
                              * # multiply with input
                              ` # push the values of the resulting list separately to stack
                              # remove the top (last) value
                              ‹ # is a < b ?
                              * # multiply by the input list
                              ¿ # calculate the gcd of the result
                              Θ # is it true ?





                              share|improve this answer























                              • Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                5 hours ago










                              • @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
                                – Emigna
                                3 hours ago














                              4












                              4








                              4







                              05AB1E, 12 11 10 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen



                              ÂÆ_*`‹*¿Θ


                              Try it online!
                              or as a Test Suite



                              Explanation



                              ÂÆ           # reduce a reversed copy of the input by subtraction
                              _ # logically negate
                              * # multiply with input
                              ` # push the values of the resulting list separately to stack
                              # remove the top (last) value
                              ‹ # is a < b ?
                              * # multiply by the input list
                              ¿ # calculate the gcd of the result
                              Θ # is it true ?





                              share|improve this answer















                              05AB1E, 12 11 10 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen



                              ÂÆ_*`‹*¿Θ


                              Try it online!
                              or as a Test Suite



                              Explanation



                              ÂÆ           # reduce a reversed copy of the input by subtraction
                              _ # logically negate
                              * # multiply with input
                              ` # push the values of the resulting list separately to stack
                              # remove the top (last) value
                              ‹ # is a < b ?
                              * # multiply by the input list
                              ¿ # calculate the gcd of the result
                              Θ # is it true ?






                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 3 hours ago

























                              answered 7 hours ago









                              Emigna

                              45.4k432138




                              45.4k432138












                              • Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                5 hours ago










                              • @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
                                – Emigna
                                3 hours ago


















                              • Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                5 hours ago










                              • @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
                                – Emigna
                                3 hours ago
















                              Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                              5 hours ago




                              Oops.. deleted my comment.. >.> So again: you can save a byte by using multiples instead of swaps with product: RÆ_*`‹*¿Θ Test Suite.
                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                              5 hours ago












                              @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
                              – Emigna
                              3 hours ago




                              @KevinCruijssen: Thanks! Yeah, usually when you have that many swaps, you're doing something wrong :P
                              – Emigna
                              3 hours ago











                              3















                              Japt, 16 14 13 11 bytes



                              <V¥yU «NÔr-


                              Try it



                                              :Implicit input of integers U=A, V=B & W=C
                              <V :Is U less than V?
                              ¥ :Test that for equality with
                              yU :The GCD of V & U
                              « :Logical AND with the negation of
                              N :The array of inputs
                              Ô :Reversed
                              r- :Reduced by subtraction





                              share|improve this answer























                              • Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
                                – Kamil Drakari
                                4 hours ago










                              • @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
                                – Shaggy
                                2 hours ago
















                              3















                              Japt, 16 14 13 11 bytes



                              <V¥yU «NÔr-


                              Try it



                                              :Implicit input of integers U=A, V=B & W=C
                              <V :Is U less than V?
                              ¥ :Test that for equality with
                              yU :The GCD of V & U
                              « :Logical AND with the negation of
                              N :The array of inputs
                              Ô :Reversed
                              r- :Reduced by subtraction





                              share|improve this answer























                              • Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
                                – Kamil Drakari
                                4 hours ago










                              • @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
                                – Shaggy
                                2 hours ago














                              3












                              3








                              3







                              Japt, 16 14 13 11 bytes



                              <V¥yU «NÔr-


                              Try it



                                              :Implicit input of integers U=A, V=B & W=C
                              <V :Is U less than V?
                              ¥ :Test that for equality with
                              yU :The GCD of V & U
                              « :Logical AND with the negation of
                              N :The array of inputs
                              Ô :Reversed
                              r- :Reduced by subtraction





                              share|improve this answer















                              Japt, 16 14 13 11 bytes



                              <V¥yU «NÔr-


                              Try it



                                              :Implicit input of integers U=A, V=B & W=C
                              <V :Is U less than V?
                              ¥ :Test that for equality with
                              yU :The GCD of V & U
                              « :Logical AND with the negation of
                              N :The array of inputs
                              Ô :Reversed
                              r- :Reduced by subtraction






                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 5 hours ago

























                              answered 7 hours ago









                              Shaggy

                              19k21666




                              19k21666












                              • Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
                                – Kamil Drakari
                                4 hours ago










                              • @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
                                – Shaggy
                                2 hours ago


















                              • Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
                                – Kamil Drakari
                                4 hours ago










                              • @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
                                – Shaggy
                                2 hours ago
















                              Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
                              – Kamil Drakari
                              4 hours ago




                              Here is another 11 byte solution, though on closer inspection it isn't much different from yours in its actual logic.
                              – Kamil Drakari
                              4 hours ago












                              @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
                              – Shaggy
                              2 hours ago




                              @KamilDrakari, had a variation on that at one stage, too. It could be 10 bytes if variables were auto-inserted when > follows ©.
                              – Shaggy
                              2 hours ago











                              3














                              JavaScript (ES6),  54 43 42  40 bytes



                              Thanks to @Shaggy for pointing out that we don't need to compute $gcd(a,c)$. Saved 11 bytes by rewriting the code accordingly.



                              Takes input as 3 separate integers. Returns $true$ for an ABC-triple, or either $0$ or $false$ otherwise.





                              f=(a,b,c)=>c&&a/b|a+b-c?0:b?f(b,a%b):a<2


                              Try it online!






                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
                                – Shaggy
                                4 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
                                – Arnauld
                                4 hours ago
















                              3














                              JavaScript (ES6),  54 43 42  40 bytes



                              Thanks to @Shaggy for pointing out that we don't need to compute $gcd(a,c)$. Saved 11 bytes by rewriting the code accordingly.



                              Takes input as 3 separate integers. Returns $true$ for an ABC-triple, or either $0$ or $false$ otherwise.





                              f=(a,b,c)=>c&&a/b|a+b-c?0:b?f(b,a%b):a<2


                              Try it online!






                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
                                – Shaggy
                                4 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
                                – Arnauld
                                4 hours ago














                              3












                              3








                              3






                              JavaScript (ES6),  54 43 42  40 bytes



                              Thanks to @Shaggy for pointing out that we don't need to compute $gcd(a,c)$. Saved 11 bytes by rewriting the code accordingly.



                              Takes input as 3 separate integers. Returns $true$ for an ABC-triple, or either $0$ or $false$ otherwise.





                              f=(a,b,c)=>c&&a/b|a+b-c?0:b?f(b,a%b):a<2


                              Try it online!






                              share|improve this answer














                              JavaScript (ES6),  54 43 42  40 bytes



                              Thanks to @Shaggy for pointing out that we don't need to compute $gcd(a,c)$. Saved 11 bytes by rewriting the code accordingly.



                              Takes input as 3 separate integers. Returns $true$ for an ABC-triple, or either $0$ or $false$ otherwise.





                              f=(a,b,c)=>c&&a/b|a+b-c?0:b?f(b,a%b):a<2


                              Try it online!







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 4 hours ago

























                              answered 7 hours ago









                              Arnauld

                              72.4k689305




                              72.4k689305








                              • 1




                                I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
                                – Shaggy
                                4 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
                                – Arnauld
                                4 hours ago














                              • 1




                                I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
                                – Shaggy
                                4 hours ago










                              • @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
                                – Arnauld
                                4 hours ago








                              1




                              1




                              I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
                              – Shaggy
                              4 hours ago




                              I don't think you need to test gcd(c,a).
                              – Shaggy
                              4 hours ago












                              @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
                              – Arnauld
                              4 hours ago




                              @Shaggy Thanks! I've rewritten the code entirely.
                              – Arnauld
                              4 hours ago











                              2














                              Excel, 33 bytes



                              =AND(A1+B1=C1,GCD(A1:C1)=1,A1<B1)





                              share|improve this answer


























                                2














                                Excel, 33 bytes



                                =AND(A1+B1=C1,GCD(A1:C1)=1,A1<B1)





                                share|improve this answer
























                                  2












                                  2








                                  2






                                  Excel, 33 bytes



                                  =AND(A1+B1=C1,GCD(A1:C1)=1,A1<B1)





                                  share|improve this answer












                                  Excel, 33 bytes



                                  =AND(A1+B1=C1,GCD(A1:C1)=1,A1<B1)






                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered 5 hours ago









                                  Wernisch

                                  1,597317




                                  1,597317























                                      2















                                      Python 2, 69 67 63 62 55 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)/gcd(a,b)
                                      from fractions import*


                                      Try it online!






                                      Python 3, 58 51 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)==gcd(a,b)
                                      from math import*


                                      Try it online!





                                      -7 bytes, thanks to H.PWiz






                                      share|improve this answer























                                      • is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
                                        – Jo King
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
                                        – david
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
                                        – BMO
                                        7 hours ago










                                      • You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
                                        – H.PWiz
                                        6 hours ago










                                      • @H.PWiz Thanks :)
                                        – TFeld
                                        5 hours ago
















                                      2















                                      Python 2, 69 67 63 62 55 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)/gcd(a,b)
                                      from fractions import*


                                      Try it online!






                                      Python 3, 58 51 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)==gcd(a,b)
                                      from math import*


                                      Try it online!





                                      -7 bytes, thanks to H.PWiz






                                      share|improve this answer























                                      • is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
                                        – Jo King
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
                                        – david
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
                                        – BMO
                                        7 hours ago










                                      • You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
                                        – H.PWiz
                                        6 hours ago










                                      • @H.PWiz Thanks :)
                                        – TFeld
                                        5 hours ago














                                      2












                                      2








                                      2







                                      Python 2, 69 67 63 62 55 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)/gcd(a,b)
                                      from fractions import*


                                      Try it online!






                                      Python 3, 58 51 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)==gcd(a,b)
                                      from math import*


                                      Try it online!





                                      -7 bytes, thanks to H.PWiz






                                      share|improve this answer















                                      Python 2, 69 67 63 62 55 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)/gcd(a,b)
                                      from fractions import*


                                      Try it online!






                                      Python 3, 58 51 bytes





                                      lambda a,b,c:(c-b==a<b)==gcd(a,b)
                                      from math import*


                                      Try it online!





                                      -7 bytes, thanks to H.PWiz







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited 5 hours ago

























                                      answered 7 hours ago









                                      TFeld

                                      14.2k21240




                                      14.2k21240












                                      • is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
                                        – Jo King
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
                                        – david
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
                                        – BMO
                                        7 hours ago










                                      • You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
                                        – H.PWiz
                                        6 hours ago










                                      • @H.PWiz Thanks :)
                                        – TFeld
                                        5 hours ago


















                                      • is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
                                        – Jo King
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
                                        – david
                                        7 hours ago






                                      • 2




                                        @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
                                        – BMO
                                        7 hours ago










                                      • You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
                                        – H.PWiz
                                        6 hours ago










                                      • @H.PWiz Thanks :)
                                        – TFeld
                                        5 hours ago
















                                      is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
                                      – Jo King
                                      7 hours ago




                                      is the gcd in gcd trick valid? What if a is not coprime with c?
                                      – Jo King
                                      7 hours ago




                                      2




                                      2




                                      @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
                                      – david
                                      7 hours ago




                                      @jo-king If p divides a and c, it should divide c-a so b.
                                      – david
                                      7 hours ago




                                      2




                                      2




                                      @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
                                      – BMO
                                      7 hours ago




                                      @JoKing: It is in this case, but not in general (you can prove it via Bezout's identity).
                                      – BMO
                                      7 hours ago












                                      You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
                                      – H.PWiz
                                      6 hours ago




                                      You can take it one step further and use gcd(a,b), since gcd(a,b) divides a+b
                                      – H.PWiz
                                      6 hours ago












                                      @H.PWiz Thanks :)
                                      – TFeld
                                      5 hours ago




                                      @H.PWiz Thanks :)
                                      – TFeld
                                      5 hours ago











                                      2














                                      bash, 61 bytes





                                      factor $@|grep -vzP '( .+b).*n.*1b'&&(($1<$2&&$1+$2==$3))


                                      Try it online!



                                      Input as command line arguments,
                                      output in the exit code
                                      (also produces output on stdout as a side effect, but this can be ignored).



                                      The second part (starting from &&(() is pretty standard,
                                      but the interesting bit is the coprime test:



                                      factor $@      # produces output of the form "6: 2 3n8: 2 2 2n14: 2 7n"
                                      |grep - # regex search on the result
                                      v # invert the match (return truthy for strings that don't match)
                                      z # zero-terminated, allowing us to match newlines
                                      P # perl (extended) regex
                                      '( .+b)' # match one or more full factors
                                      '.*n.*' # and somewhere on the next line...
                                      '1b' # find the same full factors





                                      share|improve this answer


























                                        2














                                        bash, 61 bytes





                                        factor $@|grep -vzP '( .+b).*n.*1b'&&(($1<$2&&$1+$2==$3))


                                        Try it online!



                                        Input as command line arguments,
                                        output in the exit code
                                        (also produces output on stdout as a side effect, but this can be ignored).



                                        The second part (starting from &&(() is pretty standard,
                                        but the interesting bit is the coprime test:



                                        factor $@      # produces output of the form "6: 2 3n8: 2 2 2n14: 2 7n"
                                        |grep - # regex search on the result
                                        v # invert the match (return truthy for strings that don't match)
                                        z # zero-terminated, allowing us to match newlines
                                        P # perl (extended) regex
                                        '( .+b)' # match one or more full factors
                                        '.*n.*' # and somewhere on the next line...
                                        '1b' # find the same full factors





                                        share|improve this answer
























                                          2












                                          2








                                          2






                                          bash, 61 bytes





                                          factor $@|grep -vzP '( .+b).*n.*1b'&&(($1<$2&&$1+$2==$3))


                                          Try it online!



                                          Input as command line arguments,
                                          output in the exit code
                                          (also produces output on stdout as a side effect, but this can be ignored).



                                          The second part (starting from &&(() is pretty standard,
                                          but the interesting bit is the coprime test:



                                          factor $@      # produces output of the form "6: 2 3n8: 2 2 2n14: 2 7n"
                                          |grep - # regex search on the result
                                          v # invert the match (return truthy for strings that don't match)
                                          z # zero-terminated, allowing us to match newlines
                                          P # perl (extended) regex
                                          '( .+b)' # match one or more full factors
                                          '.*n.*' # and somewhere on the next line...
                                          '1b' # find the same full factors





                                          share|improve this answer












                                          bash, 61 bytes





                                          factor $@|grep -vzP '( .+b).*n.*1b'&&(($1<$2&&$1+$2==$3))


                                          Try it online!



                                          Input as command line arguments,
                                          output in the exit code
                                          (also produces output on stdout as a side effect, but this can be ignored).



                                          The second part (starting from &&(() is pretty standard,
                                          but the interesting bit is the coprime test:



                                          factor $@      # produces output of the form "6: 2 3n8: 2 2 2n14: 2 7n"
                                          |grep - # regex search on the result
                                          v # invert the match (return truthy for strings that don't match)
                                          z # zero-terminated, allowing us to match newlines
                                          P # perl (extended) regex
                                          '( .+b)' # match one or more full factors
                                          '.*n.*' # and somewhere on the next line...
                                          '1b' # find the same full factors






                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered 4 hours ago









                                          Doorknob

                                          54.3k17113346




                                          54.3k17113346























                                              2















                                              C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 59 bytes





                                              (a,b,c)=>Enumerable.Range(2,a).All(i=>a%i+b%i>0)&a<b&a+b==c


                                              Try it online!






                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                2















                                                C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 59 bytes





                                                (a,b,c)=>Enumerable.Range(2,a).All(i=>a%i+b%i>0)&a<b&a+b==c


                                                Try it online!






                                                share|improve this answer


























                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2







                                                  C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 59 bytes





                                                  (a,b,c)=>Enumerable.Range(2,a).All(i=>a%i+b%i>0)&a<b&a+b==c


                                                  Try it online!






                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 59 bytes





                                                  (a,b,c)=>Enumerable.Range(2,a).All(i=>a%i+b%i>0)&a<b&a+b==c


                                                  Try it online!







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited 1 hour ago

























                                                  answered 2 hours ago









                                                  dana

                                                  48135




                                                  48135























                                                      1















                                                      J, 27 bytes



                                                      (+/=2*{:)*({.<1{])*1=+./ .*


                                                      Try it online!



                                                      Inspired by Jo King's Perl solution






                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                        1















                                                        J, 27 bytes



                                                        (+/=2*{:)*({.<1{])*1=+./ .*


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        Inspired by Jo King's Perl solution






                                                        share|improve this answer


























                                                          1












                                                          1








                                                          1







                                                          J, 27 bytes



                                                          (+/=2*{:)*({.<1{])*1=+./ .*


                                                          Try it online!



                                                          Inspired by Jo King's Perl solution






                                                          share|improve this answer















                                                          J, 27 bytes



                                                          (+/=2*{:)*({.<1{])*1=+./ .*


                                                          Try it online!



                                                          Inspired by Jo King's Perl solution







                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          edited 6 hours ago

























                                                          answered 7 hours ago









                                                          Galen Ivanov

                                                          6,35711032




                                                          6,35711032























                                                              1















                                                              Pari/GP, 32 bytes



                                                              (a,b,c)->gcd(a,b)<2&&a<b&&a+b==c


                                                              Try it online!






                                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                                1















                                                                Pari/GP, 32 bytes



                                                                (a,b,c)->gcd(a,b)<2&&a<b&&a+b==c


                                                                Try it online!






                                                                share|improve this answer
























                                                                  1












                                                                  1








                                                                  1







                                                                  Pari/GP, 32 bytes



                                                                  (a,b,c)->gcd(a,b)<2&&a<b&&a+b==c


                                                                  Try it online!






                                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                                  Pari/GP, 32 bytes



                                                                  (a,b,c)->gcd(a,b)<2&&a<b&&a+b==c


                                                                  Try it online!







                                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                                  answered 3 hours ago









                                                                  alephalpha

                                                                  21.2k32989




                                                                  21.2k32989























                                                                      1















                                                                      C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 90 bytes





                                                                      n=>new int[(int)1e8].Where((_,b)=>n[0]%++b<1&n[1]%b<1).Count()<2&n[0]+n[1]==n[2]&n[0]<n[1]


                                                                      Runs for numbers up to 1e8, takes about 35 seconds on my machine. Instead of calculating the gcd like others, the function just instantiate a huge array and filter the indexes that aren't divisors of a or b, and check how many elements are left. Next it check if element one plus element two equals element three. Lastly, it checks if the first element is less than the second.



                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                                        1















                                                                        C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 90 bytes





                                                                        n=>new int[(int)1e8].Where((_,b)=>n[0]%++b<1&n[1]%b<1).Count()<2&n[0]+n[1]==n[2]&n[0]<n[1]


                                                                        Runs for numbers up to 1e8, takes about 35 seconds on my machine. Instead of calculating the gcd like others, the function just instantiate a huge array and filter the indexes that aren't divisors of a or b, and check how many elements are left. Next it check if element one plus element two equals element three. Lastly, it checks if the first element is less than the second.



                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                        share|improve this answer
























                                                                          1












                                                                          1








                                                                          1







                                                                          C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 90 bytes





                                                                          n=>new int[(int)1e8].Where((_,b)=>n[0]%++b<1&n[1]%b<1).Count()<2&n[0]+n[1]==n[2]&n[0]<n[1]


                                                                          Runs for numbers up to 1e8, takes about 35 seconds on my machine. Instead of calculating the gcd like others, the function just instantiate a huge array and filter the indexes that aren't divisors of a or b, and check how many elements are left. Next it check if element one plus element two equals element three. Lastly, it checks if the first element is less than the second.



                                                                          Try it online!






                                                                          share|improve this answer













                                                                          C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 90 bytes





                                                                          n=>new int[(int)1e8].Where((_,b)=>n[0]%++b<1&n[1]%b<1).Count()<2&n[0]+n[1]==n[2]&n[0]<n[1]


                                                                          Runs for numbers up to 1e8, takes about 35 seconds on my machine. Instead of calculating the gcd like others, the function just instantiate a huge array and filter the indexes that aren't divisors of a or b, and check how many elements are left. Next it check if element one plus element two equals element three. Lastly, it checks if the first element is less than the second.



                                                                          Try it online!







                                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                                          answered 3 hours ago









                                                                          Embodiment of Ignorance

                                                                          47014




                                                                          47014























                                                                              1















                                                                              C# (.NET Core), 68 bytes



                                                                              Without Linq.





                                                                              (a,b,c)=>{var t=a<b&a+b==c;while(b>0){c=b;b=a%b;a=c;}return t&a<2;};


                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                                                1















                                                                                C# (.NET Core), 68 bytes



                                                                                Without Linq.





                                                                                (a,b,c)=>{var t=a<b&a+b==c;while(b>0){c=b;b=a%b;a=c;}return t&a<2;};


                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                share|improve this answer
























                                                                                  1












                                                                                  1








                                                                                  1







                                                                                  C# (.NET Core), 68 bytes



                                                                                  Without Linq.





                                                                                  (a,b,c)=>{var t=a<b&a+b==c;while(b>0){c=b;b=a%b;a=c;}return t&a<2;};


                                                                                  Try it online!






                                                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                                                  C# (.NET Core), 68 bytes



                                                                                  Without Linq.





                                                                                  (a,b,c)=>{var t=a<b&a+b==c;while(b>0){c=b;b=a%b;a=c;}return t&a<2;};


                                                                                  Try it online!







                                                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                                                  answered 2 hours ago









                                                                                  Destroigo

                                                                                  713




                                                                                  713























                                                                                      1















                                                                                      Stax, 12 bytes



                                                                                      ü╡v╕7+Pü°╔|g


                                                                                      Run and debug it






                                                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                                                        1















                                                                                        Stax, 12 bytes



                                                                                        ü╡v╕7+Pü°╔|g


                                                                                        Run and debug it






                                                                                        share|improve this answer
























                                                                                          1












                                                                                          1








                                                                                          1







                                                                                          Stax, 12 bytes



                                                                                          ü╡v╕7+Pü°╔|g


                                                                                          Run and debug it






                                                                                          share|improve this answer













                                                                                          Stax, 12 bytes



                                                                                          ü╡v╕7+Pü°╔|g


                                                                                          Run and debug it







                                                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                                                          answered 2 hours ago









                                                                                          wastl

                                                                                          2,084425




                                                                                          2,084425























                                                                                              1














                                                                                              Wolfram Language 24 30 28 bytes



                                                                                              With 2 bytes saved by Doorknob,



                                                                                              #<#2&&CoprimeQ@##&&#+#2==#3&





                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                              • Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                3 hours ago












                                                                                              • I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                3 hours ago










                                                                                              • @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                2 hours ago










                                                                                              • They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                2 hours ago


















                                                                                              1














                                                                                              Wolfram Language 24 30 28 bytes



                                                                                              With 2 bytes saved by Doorknob,



                                                                                              #<#2&&CoprimeQ@##&&#+#2==#3&





                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                              • Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                3 hours ago












                                                                                              • I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                3 hours ago










                                                                                              • @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                2 hours ago










                                                                                              • They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                2 hours ago
















                                                                                              1












                                                                                              1








                                                                                              1






                                                                                              Wolfram Language 24 30 28 bytes



                                                                                              With 2 bytes saved by Doorknob,



                                                                                              #<#2&&CoprimeQ@##&&#+#2==#3&





                                                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                                                              Wolfram Language 24 30 28 bytes



                                                                                              With 2 bytes saved by Doorknob,



                                                                                              #<#2&&CoprimeQ@##&&#+#2==#3&






                                                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                                              edited 2 hours ago

























                                                                                              answered 5 hours ago









                                                                                              DavidC

                                                                                              23.9k243102




                                                                                              23.9k243102












                                                                                              • Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                3 hours ago












                                                                                              • I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                3 hours ago










                                                                                              • @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                2 hours ago










                                                                                              • They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                2 hours ago




















                                                                                              • Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                3 hours ago












                                                                                              • I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                3 hours ago










                                                                                              • @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                                                                                                – DavidC
                                                                                                2 hours ago










                                                                                              • They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                                                                                                – Doorknob
                                                                                                2 hours ago


















                                                                                              Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                                                                                              – DavidC
                                                                                              3 hours ago






                                                                                              Good catch! I had overlooked the constraint that # be less than #2.
                                                                                              – DavidC
                                                                                              3 hours ago














                                                                                              I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                                                                                              – Doorknob
                                                                                              3 hours ago




                                                                                              I think you should also be able to use CoprimeQ@## to save 2 bytes.
                                                                                              – Doorknob
                                                                                              3 hours ago












                                                                                              @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                                                                                              – DavidC
                                                                                              2 hours ago




                                                                                              @Doorknob, If the first and second numbers are coprime, are they necessarily coprime with their sum?
                                                                                              – DavidC
                                                                                              2 hours ago












                                                                                              They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                                                                                              – Doorknob
                                                                                              2 hours ago






                                                                                              They are, but the original definition actually states that A, B, and C should be coprime. Most answers check only A and B just because it's usually shorter.
                                                                                              – Doorknob
                                                                                              2 hours ago













                                                                                              0















                                                                                              Clean, 43 bytes



                                                                                              import StdEnv
                                                                                              $a b c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                              Similar to basically everything else because the direct test is the same.






                                                                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                0















                                                                                                Clean, 43 bytes



                                                                                                import StdEnv
                                                                                                $a b c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                                Similar to basically everything else because the direct test is the same.






                                                                                                share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                  0












                                                                                                  0








                                                                                                  0







                                                                                                  Clean, 43 bytes



                                                                                                  import StdEnv
                                                                                                  $a b c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                                                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                                                  Similar to basically everything else because the direct test is the same.






                                                                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                                                                  Clean, 43 bytes



                                                                                                  import StdEnv
                                                                                                  $a b c=a<b&&a+b==c&&gcd a b<2


                                                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                                                  Similar to basically everything else because the direct test is the same.







                                                                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                                                                  answered 2 hours ago









                                                                                                  Οurous

                                                                                                  6,46211033




                                                                                                  6,46211033






























                                                                                                      draft saved

                                                                                                      draft discarded




















































                                                                                                      If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                                                                      • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                                                                      • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                                                                        Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                                                                      • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                                                                      More generally…




                                                                                                      • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                                                                      • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).






                                                                                                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                                                                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                                                                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                                                      But avoid



                                                                                                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                                                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                                                                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                                                      draft saved


                                                                                                      draft discarded














                                                                                                      StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                                      function () {
                                                                                                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f178303%2ffind-if-a-list-is-an-abc-triple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                      );

                                                                                                      Post as a guest















                                                                                                      Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                                      Required, but never shown














                                                                                                      Required, but never shown












                                                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                                                      Required, but never shown

































                                                                                                      Required, but never shown














                                                                                                      Required, but never shown












                                                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                                                      Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                      CARDNET

                                                                                                      Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

                                                                                                      濃尾地震