4x4 chessboard, bishops and knights are removed, 4 moves to checkmate
Four-by-four chessboard
Bishops and knights are removed
Four moves to checkmate
Minor spoiler:
Many ways to win
I counted nine solutions
But one is special
Source: Me, I think this website needs more haiku :)
chess poetry
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
add a comment |
Four-by-four chessboard
Bishops and knights are removed
Four moves to checkmate
Minor spoiler:
Many ways to win
I counted nine solutions
But one is special
Source: Me, I think this website needs more haiku :)
chess poetry
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
there's not enough room for 8 pawns aside. can i assume 4 pawns a side are missing too?
– SteveV
3 hours ago
No further comment / Time for explaining is past / Death of the author :-)
– deep thought
1 min ago
add a comment |
Four-by-four chessboard
Bishops and knights are removed
Four moves to checkmate
Minor spoiler:
Many ways to win
I counted nine solutions
But one is special
Source: Me, I think this website needs more haiku :)
chess poetry
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
Four-by-four chessboard
Bishops and knights are removed
Four moves to checkmate
Minor spoiler:
Many ways to win
I counted nine solutions
But one is special
Source: Me, I think this website needs more haiku :)
chess poetry
chess poetry
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
edited 3 hours ago
deep thought
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
asked 3 hours ago
deep thoughtdeep thought
3,0621735
3,0621735
there's not enough room for 8 pawns aside. can i assume 4 pawns a side are missing too?
– SteveV
3 hours ago
No further comment / Time for explaining is past / Death of the author :-)
– deep thought
1 min ago
add a comment |
there's not enough room for 8 pawns aside. can i assume 4 pawns a side are missing too?
– SteveV
3 hours ago
No further comment / Time for explaining is past / Death of the author :-)
– deep thought
1 min ago
there's not enough room for 8 pawns aside. can i assume 4 pawns a side are missing too?
– SteveV
3 hours ago
there's not enough room for 8 pawns aside. can i assume 4 pawns a side are missing too?
– SteveV
3 hours ago
No further comment / Time for explaining is past / Death of the author :-)
– deep thought
1 min ago
No further comment / Time for explaining is past / Death of the author :-)
– deep thought
1 min ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I'm going to assume this is the intended puzzle:
Mate in 4.
Here's one solution (or four, depending on how you count), I think:
Take twice on b3.
B-pawn takes; discovered check.
Queen to a2, mate.
Or in a more common notation:
1. axb3+ Qxb3
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. bxa3+ Kc4
4. Qa2#
If2. - Kb4?instead, then3. bxc3#
After ruling out pretty much everything else, here are four more solutions: (found the special one before these, but saving it for last in order to maintain dramatic tension..)
Start just like before.
Queen to A2 on move three,
then mate with a pawn
1. axb3+ Qxb3 (again, white can reorder the first two moves)
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. Qa2+ Kb4
4. bxc3# (or dxc3#)
And finally, the special one:
Sac queen on d3:
Exclamation marks galore.
Easy mate in two.
1. cxd3+! Rxd3
2. Qxd3+!! Kxd3
3. dxc3+ Kc4
4. Rd4#
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78279%2f4x4-chessboard-bishops-and-knights-are-removed-4-moves-to-checkmate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'm going to assume this is the intended puzzle:
Mate in 4.
Here's one solution (or four, depending on how you count), I think:
Take twice on b3.
B-pawn takes; discovered check.
Queen to a2, mate.
Or in a more common notation:
1. axb3+ Qxb3
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. bxa3+ Kc4
4. Qa2#
If2. - Kb4?instead, then3. bxc3#
After ruling out pretty much everything else, here are four more solutions: (found the special one before these, but saving it for last in order to maintain dramatic tension..)
Start just like before.
Queen to A2 on move three,
then mate with a pawn
1. axb3+ Qxb3 (again, white can reorder the first two moves)
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. Qa2+ Kb4
4. bxc3# (or dxc3#)
And finally, the special one:
Sac queen on d3:
Exclamation marks galore.
Easy mate in two.
1. cxd3+! Rxd3
2. Qxd3+!! Kxd3
3. dxc3+ Kc4
4. Rd4#
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
add a comment |
I'm going to assume this is the intended puzzle:
Mate in 4.
Here's one solution (or four, depending on how you count), I think:
Take twice on b3.
B-pawn takes; discovered check.
Queen to a2, mate.
Or in a more common notation:
1. axb3+ Qxb3
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. bxa3+ Kc4
4. Qa2#
If2. - Kb4?instead, then3. bxc3#
After ruling out pretty much everything else, here are four more solutions: (found the special one before these, but saving it for last in order to maintain dramatic tension..)
Start just like before.
Queen to A2 on move three,
then mate with a pawn
1. axb3+ Qxb3 (again, white can reorder the first two moves)
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. Qa2+ Kb4
4. bxc3# (or dxc3#)
And finally, the special one:
Sac queen on d3:
Exclamation marks galore.
Easy mate in two.
1. cxd3+! Rxd3
2. Qxd3+!! Kxd3
3. dxc3+ Kc4
4. Rd4#
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
add a comment |
I'm going to assume this is the intended puzzle:
Mate in 4.
Here's one solution (or four, depending on how you count), I think:
Take twice on b3.
B-pawn takes; discovered check.
Queen to a2, mate.
Or in a more common notation:
1. axb3+ Qxb3
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. bxa3+ Kc4
4. Qa2#
If2. - Kb4?instead, then3. bxc3#
After ruling out pretty much everything else, here are four more solutions: (found the special one before these, but saving it for last in order to maintain dramatic tension..)
Start just like before.
Queen to A2 on move three,
then mate with a pawn
1. axb3+ Qxb3 (again, white can reorder the first two moves)
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. Qa2+ Kb4
4. bxc3# (or dxc3#)
And finally, the special one:
Sac queen on d3:
Exclamation marks galore.
Easy mate in two.
1. cxd3+! Rxd3
2. Qxd3+!! Kxd3
3. dxc3+ Kc4
4. Rd4#
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
I'm going to assume this is the intended puzzle:
Mate in 4.
Here's one solution (or four, depending on how you count), I think:
Take twice on b3.
B-pawn takes; discovered check.
Queen to a2, mate.
Or in a more common notation:
1. axb3+ Qxb3
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. bxa3+ Kc4
4. Qa2#
If2. - Kb4?instead, then3. bxc3#
After ruling out pretty much everything else, here are four more solutions: (found the special one before these, but saving it for last in order to maintain dramatic tension..)
Start just like before.
Queen to A2 on move three,
then mate with a pawn
1. axb3+ Qxb3 (again, white can reorder the first two moves)
2. cxb3+ Kxb3
3. Qa2+ Kb4
4. bxc3# (or dxc3#)
And finally, the special one:
Sac queen on d3:
Exclamation marks galore.
Easy mate in two.
1. cxd3+! Rxd3
2. Qxd3+!! Kxd3
3. dxc3+ Kc4
4. Rd4#
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
edited 32 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
answered 2 hours ago
BassBass
27.5k465169
27.5k465169
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
add a comment |
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Correct, that's one. Actually, that's two. The original notation can be translated into common notation two ways.
– deep thought
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
Changing the second line to "b-pawn takes: discovered check" brings that up to four, even :-)
– Bass
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
That's right, plus the nice one makes five, so you've got most of them!
– deep thought
1 hour ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
... And now nine. Well done! And extra exclamation points for your notation!!
– deep thought
40 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78279%2f4x4-chessboard-bishops-and-knights-are-removed-4-moves-to-checkmate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
there's not enough room for 8 pawns aside. can i assume 4 pawns a side are missing too?
– SteveV
3 hours ago
No further comment / Time for explaining is past / Death of the author :-)
– deep thought
1 min ago