Do I need my own life insurance if I already have life insurance through work?












2














My employer offers discounted life insurance as an employee benefit. I pay $70 per year for about $200,000 of coverage. Buying comparable coverage outside of work would cost me about $300-$400 per year at my current age/health status.



I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. Additionally, the older or sicker I am, the harder and more expensive it would be to get affordable life insurance.



I have a spouse who currently works and kids under age 10. Is there a strong case for purchasing my own term life policy in addition to (or instead of) what my employer offers?










share|improve this question






















  • I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. are you SURE about that? Generally discounted coverage that you buy through an employer sponsored program has some "portability" provision that allows you to take the coverage with you.
    – quid
    4 hours ago
















2














My employer offers discounted life insurance as an employee benefit. I pay $70 per year for about $200,000 of coverage. Buying comparable coverage outside of work would cost me about $300-$400 per year at my current age/health status.



I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. Additionally, the older or sicker I am, the harder and more expensive it would be to get affordable life insurance.



I have a spouse who currently works and kids under age 10. Is there a strong case for purchasing my own term life policy in addition to (or instead of) what my employer offers?










share|improve this question






















  • I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. are you SURE about that? Generally discounted coverage that you buy through an employer sponsored program has some "portability" provision that allows you to take the coverage with you.
    – quid
    4 hours ago














2












2








2







My employer offers discounted life insurance as an employee benefit. I pay $70 per year for about $200,000 of coverage. Buying comparable coverage outside of work would cost me about $300-$400 per year at my current age/health status.



I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. Additionally, the older or sicker I am, the harder and more expensive it would be to get affordable life insurance.



I have a spouse who currently works and kids under age 10. Is there a strong case for purchasing my own term life policy in addition to (or instead of) what my employer offers?










share|improve this question













My employer offers discounted life insurance as an employee benefit. I pay $70 per year for about $200,000 of coverage. Buying comparable coverage outside of work would cost me about $300-$400 per year at my current age/health status.



I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. Additionally, the older or sicker I am, the harder and more expensive it would be to get affordable life insurance.



I have a spouse who currently works and kids under age 10. Is there a strong case for purchasing my own term life policy in addition to (or instead of) what my employer offers?







life-insurance






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









lizzivlizziv

282




282












  • I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. are you SURE about that? Generally discounted coverage that you buy through an employer sponsored program has some "portability" provision that allows you to take the coverage with you.
    – quid
    4 hours ago


















  • I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. are you SURE about that? Generally discounted coverage that you buy through an employer sponsored program has some "portability" provision that allows you to take the coverage with you.
    – quid
    4 hours ago
















I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. are you SURE about that? Generally discounted coverage that you buy through an employer sponsored program has some "portability" provision that allows you to take the coverage with you.
– quid
4 hours ago




I understand that if I leave the company for any reason, such as taking a new job or being fired or laid off, I instantly lose this life insurance. are you SURE about that? Generally discounted coverage that you buy through an employer sponsored program has some "portability" provision that allows you to take the coverage with you.
– quid
4 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














The rule of thumb for life insurance is to have 10 times your income if you have people that depend on your income. 10 times let your beneficiary invest the insurance at relatively safe return levels and will last many years. With kids under 10, $200K is probably not enough to support them if you pass.



Shop around for 10- or 15-year term insurance to get you closer to 10X your salary. After 10 or 15 years, you can reassess your needs based on if kids are still dependent on you, and how much retirement savings you have (which can be used in place of life insurance).



Don't mess with whole or universal. They are typically sold as investments combined with insurance, but the amount you pay above what equivalent term insurance costs usually has a bad return as an investment.






share|improve this answer





















  • Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
    – lizziv
    3 hours ago










  • @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
    – D Stanley
    3 hours ago



















0














If you think your current life insurance coverage is not sufficient, you buy additional term life insurance. There is no reason replace your employment benefit with a a higher rate for the same insurance benefit. If your employment situation changes, you are always free to buy term insurance then.






share|improve this answer





















  • Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
    – Chris W. Rea
    1 hour ago



















0














In addition to the recommendations by DStanley, consider getting a term life mortgage insurance policy if you own a home with your spouse as the beneficiary. These policies have a level premium for n years (typically 15 to 30 years) and a death benefit that reduces approximately as the remaining mortgage balance declines over the n years. Once upon a time, and perhaps even now, typical mortgages had clauses to the effect that in case of any changes in the financial situation of the family (e.g. the primary breadwinner dying) that would cause the lender jitters, the principal would be due immediately. So, having a mortgage insurance policy ensures that the grieving surviving spouse has one fewer matter to be hassled about. Besides, not having a monthly mortgage payment anymore is effectively additional disposable income for your spouse.



Note that this policy is different from the quite expensive policy that a lender will sell you (or even insist upon selling you if your downpayment was smaller than what the lender considers adequate) for which the beneficiary is the lender, and if you have been making extra payments towards your mortgage, the lender will make a little extra profit off of you.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "93"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103879%2fdo-i-need-my-own-life-insurance-if-i-already-have-life-insurance-through-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    The rule of thumb for life insurance is to have 10 times your income if you have people that depend on your income. 10 times let your beneficiary invest the insurance at relatively safe return levels and will last many years. With kids under 10, $200K is probably not enough to support them if you pass.



    Shop around for 10- or 15-year term insurance to get you closer to 10X your salary. After 10 or 15 years, you can reassess your needs based on if kids are still dependent on you, and how much retirement savings you have (which can be used in place of life insurance).



    Don't mess with whole or universal. They are typically sold as investments combined with insurance, but the amount you pay above what equivalent term insurance costs usually has a bad return as an investment.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
      – lizziv
      3 hours ago










    • @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
      – D Stanley
      3 hours ago
















    3














    The rule of thumb for life insurance is to have 10 times your income if you have people that depend on your income. 10 times let your beneficiary invest the insurance at relatively safe return levels and will last many years. With kids under 10, $200K is probably not enough to support them if you pass.



    Shop around for 10- or 15-year term insurance to get you closer to 10X your salary. After 10 or 15 years, you can reassess your needs based on if kids are still dependent on you, and how much retirement savings you have (which can be used in place of life insurance).



    Don't mess with whole or universal. They are typically sold as investments combined with insurance, but the amount you pay above what equivalent term insurance costs usually has a bad return as an investment.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
      – lizziv
      3 hours ago










    • @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
      – D Stanley
      3 hours ago














    3












    3








    3






    The rule of thumb for life insurance is to have 10 times your income if you have people that depend on your income. 10 times let your beneficiary invest the insurance at relatively safe return levels and will last many years. With kids under 10, $200K is probably not enough to support them if you pass.



    Shop around for 10- or 15-year term insurance to get you closer to 10X your salary. After 10 or 15 years, you can reassess your needs based on if kids are still dependent on you, and how much retirement savings you have (which can be used in place of life insurance).



    Don't mess with whole or universal. They are typically sold as investments combined with insurance, but the amount you pay above what equivalent term insurance costs usually has a bad return as an investment.






    share|improve this answer












    The rule of thumb for life insurance is to have 10 times your income if you have people that depend on your income. 10 times let your beneficiary invest the insurance at relatively safe return levels and will last many years. With kids under 10, $200K is probably not enough to support them if you pass.



    Shop around for 10- or 15-year term insurance to get you closer to 10X your salary. After 10 or 15 years, you can reassess your needs based on if kids are still dependent on you, and how much retirement savings you have (which can be used in place of life insurance).



    Don't mess with whole or universal. They are typically sold as investments combined with insurance, but the amount you pay above what equivalent term insurance costs usually has a bad return as an investment.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    D StanleyD Stanley

    51.7k8151161




    51.7k8151161












    • Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
      – lizziv
      3 hours ago










    • @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
      – D Stanley
      3 hours ago


















    • Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
      – lizziv
      3 hours ago










    • @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
      – D Stanley
      3 hours ago
















    Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
    – lizziv
    3 hours ago




    Would it be better to get a separate policy for 10X salary, or get a separate policy for 10X salary - $200k? The root of my question is, is it "ok" to rely on my employer's life insurance benefit as part of my planning, or is that not a good practice?
    – lizziv
    3 hours ago












    @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
    – D Stanley
    3 hours ago




    @lizziv I would probably keep the employer-provided insurance below 20 to 25% of the total, but there's no hard-and-fast rule.
    – D Stanley
    3 hours ago













    0














    If you think your current life insurance coverage is not sufficient, you buy additional term life insurance. There is no reason replace your employment benefit with a a higher rate for the same insurance benefit. If your employment situation changes, you are always free to buy term insurance then.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
      – Chris W. Rea
      1 hour ago
















    0














    If you think your current life insurance coverage is not sufficient, you buy additional term life insurance. There is no reason replace your employment benefit with a a higher rate for the same insurance benefit. If your employment situation changes, you are always free to buy term insurance then.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
      – Chris W. Rea
      1 hour ago














    0












    0








    0






    If you think your current life insurance coverage is not sufficient, you buy additional term life insurance. There is no reason replace your employment benefit with a a higher rate for the same insurance benefit. If your employment situation changes, you are always free to buy term insurance then.






    share|improve this answer












    If you think your current life insurance coverage is not sufficient, you buy additional term life insurance. There is no reason replace your employment benefit with a a higher rate for the same insurance benefit. If your employment situation changes, you are always free to buy term insurance then.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    mattmmattm

    1,487411




    1,487411












    • Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
      – Chris W. Rea
      1 hour ago


















    • Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
      – Chris W. Rea
      1 hour ago
















    Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
    – Chris W. Rea
    1 hour ago




    Re: "you are always free to buy term insurance then"... Only if still in good health!
    – Chris W. Rea
    1 hour ago











    0














    In addition to the recommendations by DStanley, consider getting a term life mortgage insurance policy if you own a home with your spouse as the beneficiary. These policies have a level premium for n years (typically 15 to 30 years) and a death benefit that reduces approximately as the remaining mortgage balance declines over the n years. Once upon a time, and perhaps even now, typical mortgages had clauses to the effect that in case of any changes in the financial situation of the family (e.g. the primary breadwinner dying) that would cause the lender jitters, the principal would be due immediately. So, having a mortgage insurance policy ensures that the grieving surviving spouse has one fewer matter to be hassled about. Besides, not having a monthly mortgage payment anymore is effectively additional disposable income for your spouse.



    Note that this policy is different from the quite expensive policy that a lender will sell you (or even insist upon selling you if your downpayment was smaller than what the lender considers adequate) for which the beneficiary is the lender, and if you have been making extra payments towards your mortgage, the lender will make a little extra profit off of you.






    share|improve this answer


























      0














      In addition to the recommendations by DStanley, consider getting a term life mortgage insurance policy if you own a home with your spouse as the beneficiary. These policies have a level premium for n years (typically 15 to 30 years) and a death benefit that reduces approximately as the remaining mortgage balance declines over the n years. Once upon a time, and perhaps even now, typical mortgages had clauses to the effect that in case of any changes in the financial situation of the family (e.g. the primary breadwinner dying) that would cause the lender jitters, the principal would be due immediately. So, having a mortgage insurance policy ensures that the grieving surviving spouse has one fewer matter to be hassled about. Besides, not having a monthly mortgage payment anymore is effectively additional disposable income for your spouse.



      Note that this policy is different from the quite expensive policy that a lender will sell you (or even insist upon selling you if your downpayment was smaller than what the lender considers adequate) for which the beneficiary is the lender, and if you have been making extra payments towards your mortgage, the lender will make a little extra profit off of you.






      share|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        In addition to the recommendations by DStanley, consider getting a term life mortgage insurance policy if you own a home with your spouse as the beneficiary. These policies have a level premium for n years (typically 15 to 30 years) and a death benefit that reduces approximately as the remaining mortgage balance declines over the n years. Once upon a time, and perhaps even now, typical mortgages had clauses to the effect that in case of any changes in the financial situation of the family (e.g. the primary breadwinner dying) that would cause the lender jitters, the principal would be due immediately. So, having a mortgage insurance policy ensures that the grieving surviving spouse has one fewer matter to be hassled about. Besides, not having a monthly mortgage payment anymore is effectively additional disposable income for your spouse.



        Note that this policy is different from the quite expensive policy that a lender will sell you (or even insist upon selling you if your downpayment was smaller than what the lender considers adequate) for which the beneficiary is the lender, and if you have been making extra payments towards your mortgage, the lender will make a little extra profit off of you.






        share|improve this answer












        In addition to the recommendations by DStanley, consider getting a term life mortgage insurance policy if you own a home with your spouse as the beneficiary. These policies have a level premium for n years (typically 15 to 30 years) and a death benefit that reduces approximately as the remaining mortgage balance declines over the n years. Once upon a time, and perhaps even now, typical mortgages had clauses to the effect that in case of any changes in the financial situation of the family (e.g. the primary breadwinner dying) that would cause the lender jitters, the principal would be due immediately. So, having a mortgage insurance policy ensures that the grieving surviving spouse has one fewer matter to be hassled about. Besides, not having a monthly mortgage payment anymore is effectively additional disposable income for your spouse.



        Note that this policy is different from the quite expensive policy that a lender will sell you (or even insist upon selling you if your downpayment was smaller than what the lender considers adequate) for which the beneficiary is the lender, and if you have been making extra payments towards your mortgage, the lender will make a little extra profit off of you.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Dilip SarwateDilip Sarwate

        24.1k33393




        24.1k33393






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103879%2fdo-i-need-my-own-life-insurance-if-i-already-have-life-insurance-through-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            CARDNET

            Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

            濃尾地震