Why 1 second RTO lower bound is missing in RFC 6298 Linux kernel implementation












0















I am going through the implementation of RFC 6298. Then i found a statement as follows.




Whenever RTO is computed, if it is less than 1 second, then the RTO
SHOULD be rounded up to 1 second.




But this part i was not able to find in the code. There is on TCP_RTO_MIN constant which is declared as HZ/5 (200 ms). Any body can explain this?









share







New contributor




Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    I am going through the implementation of RFC 6298. Then i found a statement as follows.




    Whenever RTO is computed, if it is less than 1 second, then the RTO
    SHOULD be rounded up to 1 second.




    But this part i was not able to find in the code. There is on TCP_RTO_MIN constant which is declared as HZ/5 (200 ms). Any body can explain this?









    share







    New contributor




    Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      I am going through the implementation of RFC 6298. Then i found a statement as follows.




      Whenever RTO is computed, if it is less than 1 second, then the RTO
      SHOULD be rounded up to 1 second.




      But this part i was not able to find in the code. There is on TCP_RTO_MIN constant which is declared as HZ/5 (200 ms). Any body can explain this?









      share







      New contributor




      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I am going through the implementation of RFC 6298. Then i found a statement as follows.




      Whenever RTO is computed, if it is less than 1 second, then the RTO
      SHOULD be rounded up to 1 second.




      But this part i was not able to find in the code. There is on TCP_RTO_MIN constant which is declared as HZ/5 (200 ms). Any body can explain this?







      tcp





      share







      New contributor




      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 mins ago









      Midhun PMidhun P

      1




      1




      New contributor




      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Midhun P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Midhun P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497341%2fwhy-1-second-rto-lower-bound-is-missing-in-rfc-6298-linux-kernel-implementation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Midhun P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Midhun P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Midhun P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Midhun P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497341%2fwhy-1-second-rto-lower-bound-is-missing-in-rfc-6298-linux-kernel-implementation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          CARDNET

          Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

          Aws NAT - Aws IGW- Aws router