“Smart” substitution of subexpressions












3














I have the following question.



An expression, which I want to simplify contains several subexpressions which appear quite frequently all over the place. To optimize simplification I would like to use abbreviations for some of them. Is there any way to do it in a "smart" way, i.e. to account for subexpressions which differ only by sign/multiplication by a number or a variable? Here is an example to illustrate what I mean.



For example, the adverted subexpression is:



-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2)


and I want to use variable A1 everywhere instead it:



-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1


Now, I want Mathematica to substitute the expressions which are essentially equal to this one, but are simply written in another form like:



-a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2)

-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2))


Also it would be great to use this rule for expressions like



-2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*)


or



a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)


or even



-x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)


Is there a way to do it?






simplifying-expressions replacement semantic-matching







share|improve this question





























    3














    I have the following question.



    An expression, which I want to simplify contains several subexpressions which appear quite frequently all over the place. To optimize simplification I would like to use abbreviations for some of them. Is there any way to do it in a "smart" way, i.e. to account for subexpressions which differ only by sign/multiplication by a number or a variable? Here is an example to illustrate what I mean.



    For example, the adverted subexpression is:



    -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2)


    and I want to use variable A1 everywhere instead it:



    -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1


    Now, I want Mathematica to substitute the expressions which are essentially equal to this one, but are simply written in another form like:



    -a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2)
    
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2))


    Also it would be great to use this rule for expressions like



    -2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*)


    or



    a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)


    or even



    -x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)


    Is there a way to do it?






    simplifying-expressions replacement semantic-matching







    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3







      I have the following question.



      An expression, which I want to simplify contains several subexpressions which appear quite frequently all over the place. To optimize simplification I would like to use abbreviations for some of them. Is there any way to do it in a "smart" way, i.e. to account for subexpressions which differ only by sign/multiplication by a number or a variable? Here is an example to illustrate what I mean.



      For example, the adverted subexpression is:



      -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2)


      and I want to use variable A1 everywhere instead it:



      -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1


      Now, I want Mathematica to substitute the expressions which are essentially equal to this one, but are simply written in another form like:



      -a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2)
      
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2))


      Also it would be great to use this rule for expressions like



      -2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*)


      or



      a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)


      or even



      -x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)


      Is there a way to do it?






      simplifying-expressions replacement semantic-matching







      share|improve this question















      I have the following question.



      An expression, which I want to simplify contains several subexpressions which appear quite frequently all over the place. To optimize simplification I would like to use abbreviations for some of them. Is there any way to do it in a "smart" way, i.e. to account for subexpressions which differ only by sign/multiplication by a number or a variable? Here is an example to illustrate what I mean.



      For example, the adverted subexpression is:



      -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2)


      and I want to use variable A1 everywhere instead it:



      -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1


      Now, I want Mathematica to substitute the expressions which are essentially equal to this one, but are simply written in another form like:



      -a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2)
      
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2))


      Also it would be great to use this rule for expressions like



      -2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*)


      or



      a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)


      or even



      -x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)


      Is there a way to do it?






      simplifying-expressions replacement semantic-matching




      simplifying-expressions replacement semantic-matching






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      xzczd

      25.9k469246




      25.9k469246










      asked 3 hours ago









      user43283

      1533




      1533






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Short version :



          When one wants to do f[a+b] /. a+b->c, it is often more efficient to write f[a+b] /. a-> c-b and simplify the result ( with Simplify, Expand...).



          Long version :



          You can apply the rule b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2] (equivalent to -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1) and afterward try to simplify.



          In fact, your example is a little bit more complex because there are to possible rules b-> Sqrt[...] and b-> -Sqrt[...], but it works fine : 



          rule = Solve[-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) == A1, b]
          

          
transfomation[x_] := x /. rule // ExpandAll // Together
          

          
-a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2) // transfomation
          
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2)) // transfomation
          
-2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*) // transfomation
          
a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)// transfomation   
          
-x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)  // transfomation



          {{b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}, {b -> Sqrt[a^2 + A1]
          Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}}



          {A1, A1}



          {A1, A1}



          {2 A1, 2 A1}



          {-A1, -A1}



          {A1 x, A1 x}







          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "387"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f188876%2fsmart-substitution-of-subexpressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            Short version :



            When one wants to do f[a+b] /. a+b->c, it is often more efficient to write f[a+b] /. a-> c-b and simplify the result ( with Simplify, Expand...).



            Long version :



            You can apply the rule b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2] (equivalent to -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1) and afterward try to simplify.



            In fact, your example is a little bit more complex because there are to possible rules b-> Sqrt[...] and b-> -Sqrt[...], but it works fine : 



            rule = Solve[-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) == A1, b]
            

            
transfomation[x_] := x /. rule // ExpandAll // Together
            

            
-a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2) // transfomation
            
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2)) // transfomation
            
-2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*) // transfomation
            
a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)// transfomation   
            
-x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)  // transfomation



            {{b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}, {b -> Sqrt[a^2 + A1]
            Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}}



            {A1, A1}



            {A1, A1}



            {2 A1, 2 A1}



            {-A1, -A1}



            {A1 x, A1 x}







            share|improve this answer




























              4














              Short version :



              When one wants to do f[a+b] /. a+b->c, it is often more efficient to write f[a+b] /. a-> c-b and simplify the result ( with Simplify, Expand...).



              Long version :



              You can apply the rule b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2] (equivalent to -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1) and afterward try to simplify.



              In fact, your example is a little bit more complex because there are to possible rules b-> Sqrt[...] and b-> -Sqrt[...], but it works fine : 



              rule = Solve[-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) == A1, b]
              

              
transfomation[x_] := x /. rule // ExpandAll // Together
              

              
-a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2) // transfomation
              
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2)) // transfomation
              
-2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*) // transfomation
              
a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)// transfomation   
              
-x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)  // transfomation



              {{b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}, {b -> Sqrt[a^2 + A1]
              Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}}



              {A1, A1}



              {A1, A1}



              {2 A1, 2 A1}



              {-A1, -A1}



              {A1 x, A1 x}







              share|improve this answer


























                4












                4








                4






                Short version :



                When one wants to do f[a+b] /. a+b->c, it is often more efficient to write f[a+b] /. a-> c-b and simplify the result ( with Simplify, Expand...).



                Long version :



                You can apply the rule b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2] (equivalent to -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1) and afterward try to simplify.



                In fact, your example is a little bit more complex because there are to possible rules b-> Sqrt[...] and b-> -Sqrt[...], but it works fine : 



                rule = Solve[-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) == A1, b]
                

                
transfomation[x_] := x /. rule // ExpandAll // Together
                

                
-a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2) // transfomation
                
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2)) // transfomation
                
-2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*) // transfomation
                
a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)// transfomation   
                
-x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)  // transfomation



                {{b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}, {b -> Sqrt[a^2 + A1]
                Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}}



                {A1, A1}



                {A1, A1}



                {2 A1, 2 A1}



                {-A1, -A1}



                {A1 x, A1 x}







                share|improve this answer














                Short version :



                When one wants to do f[a+b] /. a+b->c, it is often more efficient to write f[a+b] /. a-> c-b and simplify the result ( with Simplify, Expand...).



                Long version :



                You can apply the rule b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2] (equivalent to -a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) -> A1) and afterward try to simplify.



                In fact, your example is a little bit more complex because there are to possible rules b-> Sqrt[...] and b-> -Sqrt[...], but it works fine : 



                rule = Solve[-a^2 + b^2/(c^2 - d^2) == A1, b]
                

                
transfomation[x_] := x /. rule // ExpandAll // Together
                

                
-a^2 - b^2/(d^2 - c^2) // transfomation
                
-a^2 + (-b^2/(d^2 - c^2)) // transfomation
                
-2*a^2 + 2*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*2*A1*) // transfomation
                
a^2 - b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*-A1*)// transfomation   
                
-x*a^2 + x*b^2/(c^2 - d^2) (*x*A1*)  // transfomation



                {{b -> -Sqrt[a^2 + A1] Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}, {b -> Sqrt[a^2 + A1]
                Sqrt[c^2 - d^2]}}



                {A1, A1}



                {A1, A1}



                {2 A1, 2 A1}



                {-A1, -A1}



                {A1 x, A1 x}








                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 hours ago

























                answered 2 hours ago









                andre314

                11.8k12249




                11.8k12249






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f188876%2fsmart-substitution-of-subexpressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    濃尾地震

                    Image
                    濃尾地震 『岐阜市街大地震之図』 歌川国利画 本震 発生日 1891年（明治24年）10月28日 発生時刻 6時38分50秒（JST） 震央 日本 岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市） 北緯35度35分 東経136度20分（ 地図 ） 規模    マグニチュード（M）8.0 最大震度    震度7： 注1 福井県今立郡鯖江町、愛知県葉栗郡大田島村、東春日井郡勝川村 地震の種類 直下型地震 被害 死傷者数 死者7,273人、負傷者17,175人 注1：当時の震度階級では「激烈」 プロジェクト:地球科学 プロジェクト:災害 テンプレートを表示 濃尾地震 （のうびじしん）は、1891年（明治24年）10月28日に濃尾地方で発生した、日本史上最大の内陸地殻内地震。「 美濃・尾張地震 （みの・おわりじしん）」とも呼ばれている。辛卯の年に発生したことから 辛卯震災 と呼んでいる報告書もある。 目次 1 概要 1.1 震源断層 2 被害 3 各地の震度 4 前兆現象 5 報道 6 学術的な意義 7 地震防災 8 脚注 9 関連項目 10 外部リンク 概要 濃尾地震発生当時の根尾谷断層 濃尾地震を引き起こした根尾谷断層 写真中央を斜めに走る段差が根尾谷断層 濃尾地震は、1891年10月28日6時38分50秒に発生した。震源は、岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市）、北緯35度35分、東経136度20分付近。河角廣 (1951) は岐阜市付近（北緯35.6度、東経136.6度）に震央を仮定し規模 M K = 7.0 を与え [1] 、マグニチュードは M = 8.4 に換算されているが、明治・大正期の地震については0.5程度大きく見積もられているとされる [2] 。また、震央距離と震度との関係など当時のデータから後にM8.0 [3] とも推定される。アメリカ地質調査所 (USGS) でも8.0としている [4] 。「根尾谷断層帯」が活動した典型的な内陸地殻内地震（いわゆる直下型地震）であり、これは記録が残っている日本の内陸
                    Read more

                    How to rewrite equation of hyperbola in standard form

                    Image
                    2 $begingroup$ I was wondering about this question: $$ 9 x ^ 2 -4y^2-72x=0 $$ What is the step-by-step process of writing such an equation which, in this case, has the graph of a hyperbola in standard form? Please excuse me for my messy equation. As I am relatively new to Mathematics Stack Exchange, I do not know how to insert superscripts. Thank you ahead of time! calculus conic-sections share | cite | improve this question edited 2 hours ago Key Flex 8,637 6 12 33 asked 2 hours ago
                    Read more

                    No ethernet ip address in my vocore2

                    Image
                    0 I just flashed my vocore2u with openwrt 18.06.1, and plug it with an ethernet cable to access network while setting up wireless access-point for my phone. The AP is working and connected to the network, but the ip in my phone is in the subnet of another router. And there's no ip assigned to my vocore2 so I cannot ssh into it. After connecting to vocore2 with serial terminal, ping 8.8.8.8 is also failed. How can I make my vocore2 gain ip from the router and setting up the network well? root@OpenWrt:/etc/config# ifconfig apcli0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BA:D8:12:07:01:71 inet6 addr: fe80::b8d8:12ff:fe07:171/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 erro
                    Read more