snmpd service failed to start on Red Hat 6
I got the following error when I try to start the snmpd service:
service snmpd start
**Starting snmpd: [FAILED]**
Log say:
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473284+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: getaddrinfo("bitwiz1-oam", NULL, ...): Temporary failure in name resolution
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473361+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Error opening specified endpoint "bitwiz1-oam:161"
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473390+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Server Exiting with code 1
Could someone help please?
snmp
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I got the following error when I try to start the snmpd service:
service snmpd start
**Starting snmpd: [FAILED]**
Log say:
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473284+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: getaddrinfo("bitwiz1-oam", NULL, ...): Temporary failure in name resolution
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473361+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Error opening specified endpoint "bitwiz1-oam:161"
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473390+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Server Exiting with code 1
Could someone help please?
snmp
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
So I'm supposing you tried to see if DNS resolution works on that machine, correct?
– schaiba
Feb 13 '17 at 12:44
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
– Lucas Rey
Feb 13 '17 at 13:20
add a comment |
I got the following error when I try to start the snmpd service:
service snmpd start
**Starting snmpd: [FAILED]**
Log say:
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473284+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: getaddrinfo("bitwiz1-oam", NULL, ...): Temporary failure in name resolution
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473361+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Error opening specified endpoint "bitwiz1-oam:161"
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473390+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Server Exiting with code 1
Could someone help please?
snmp
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
I got the following error when I try to start the snmpd service:
service snmpd start
**Starting snmpd: [FAILED]**
Log say:
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473284+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: getaddrinfo("bitwiz1-oam", NULL, ...): Temporary failure in name resolution
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473361+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Error opening specified endpoint "bitwiz1-oam:161"
2017-02-13T13:09:54.473390+01:00 bitwiz1 snmpd[3395]: Server Exiting with code 1
Could someone help please?
snmp
snmp
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
edited Feb 13 '17 at 12:56
Kevdog777
2,116123460
2,116123460
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
asked Feb 13 '17 at 12:40
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
So I'm supposing you tried to see if DNS resolution works on that machine, correct?
– schaiba
Feb 13 '17 at 12:44
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
– Lucas Rey
Feb 13 '17 at 13:20
add a comment |
So I'm supposing you tried to see if DNS resolution works on that machine, correct?
– schaiba
Feb 13 '17 at 12:44
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
– Lucas Rey
Feb 13 '17 at 13:20
So I'm supposing you tried to see if DNS resolution works on that machine, correct?
– schaiba
Feb 13 '17 at 12:44
So I'm supposing you tried to see if DNS resolution works on that machine, correct?
– schaiba
Feb 13 '17 at 12:44
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
– Lucas Rey
Feb 13 '17 at 13:20
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
– Lucas Rey
Feb 13 '17 at 13:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344625%2fsnmpd-service-failed-to-start-on-red-hat-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
add a comment |
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
add a comment |
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
answered Feb 13 '17 at 13:21
Lucas ReyLucas Rey
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344625%2fsnmpd-service-failed-to-start-on-red-hat-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
So I'm supposing you tried to see if DNS resolution works on that machine, correct?
– schaiba
Feb 13 '17 at 12:44
Well... just solved my self... in hosts file I change 127.0.0.1 bitwiz1 to 192.168.65.120 bitwiz1, and then... BAM! Service start without problem!! :-)
– Lucas Rey
Feb 13 '17 at 13:20