ZFS: How could my file got permanently corrupted?
I'm trying to understand what could have gone wrong.
for context:
I have a mirrored set with 3 drives and non-ECC memory. Not sure what else to share.
I was under assumption that having a 3-way mirror would keep me relatively secure from incidental corruptions, like failing drives, or that memory corruption would be recoverable (from one of 2 remaining disks).
But I'm probably misunderstanding.
Can anyone explain what could have gone wrong so I can secure myself for the future? I'm not too experienced with zfs.
Thanks!
$ sudo zpool status -v
pool: dozer
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire pool from backup.
see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 8h36m with 1 errors on Sun Jan 6 02:12:32 2019
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
dozer ONLINE 0 0 1
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K1ZKZLYK ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K6VCAZXL ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-ST4000DM000-1F2168_S301LW48 ONLINE 0 0 2
errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files:
/dozer/path/to/my/file
ubuntu zfs
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm trying to understand what could have gone wrong.
for context:
I have a mirrored set with 3 drives and non-ECC memory. Not sure what else to share.
I was under assumption that having a 3-way mirror would keep me relatively secure from incidental corruptions, like failing drives, or that memory corruption would be recoverable (from one of 2 remaining disks).
But I'm probably misunderstanding.
Can anyone explain what could have gone wrong so I can secure myself for the future? I'm not too experienced with zfs.
Thanks!
$ sudo zpool status -v
pool: dozer
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire pool from backup.
see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 8h36m with 1 errors on Sun Jan 6 02:12:32 2019
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
dozer ONLINE 0 0 1
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K1ZKZLYK ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K6VCAZXL ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-ST4000DM000-1F2168_S301LW48 ONLINE 0 0 2
errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files:
/dozer/path/to/my/file
ubuntu zfs
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm trying to understand what could have gone wrong.
for context:
I have a mirrored set with 3 drives and non-ECC memory. Not sure what else to share.
I was under assumption that having a 3-way mirror would keep me relatively secure from incidental corruptions, like failing drives, or that memory corruption would be recoverable (from one of 2 remaining disks).
But I'm probably misunderstanding.
Can anyone explain what could have gone wrong so I can secure myself for the future? I'm not too experienced with zfs.
Thanks!
$ sudo zpool status -v
pool: dozer
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire pool from backup.
see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 8h36m with 1 errors on Sun Jan 6 02:12:32 2019
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
dozer ONLINE 0 0 1
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K1ZKZLYK ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K6VCAZXL ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-ST4000DM000-1F2168_S301LW48 ONLINE 0 0 2
errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files:
/dozer/path/to/my/file
ubuntu zfs
New contributor
I'm trying to understand what could have gone wrong.
for context:
I have a mirrored set with 3 drives and non-ECC memory. Not sure what else to share.
I was under assumption that having a 3-way mirror would keep me relatively secure from incidental corruptions, like failing drives, or that memory corruption would be recoverable (from one of 2 remaining disks).
But I'm probably misunderstanding.
Can anyone explain what could have gone wrong so I can secure myself for the future? I'm not too experienced with zfs.
Thanks!
$ sudo zpool status -v
pool: dozer
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire pool from backup.
see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 8h36m with 1 errors on Sun Jan 6 02:12:32 2019
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
dozer ONLINE 0 0 1
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K1ZKZLYK ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-WDC_WD40EFRX-68N32N0_WD-WCC7K6VCAZXL ONLINE 0 0 2
ata-ST4000DM000-1F2168_S301LW48 ONLINE 0 0 2
errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files:
/dozer/path/to/my/file
ubuntu zfs
ubuntu zfs
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 22 mins ago
Bartek Chlebek
1012
1012
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You do understand that if any single non-RAIDed drive has a failure, you lose data and the same is true if one of the non-ECC memory chips has a failure: you lose data.
And even if you have:
- dual processors
- dual NICs
- dual hard drives
- ECC memory
- High-availability fail-over servers in a different data centre on a different continent
...any kind of uncorrectable error (Bug, human, Electro-Magnetic Pulse, .. ) can still lead to data loss.
And that's why, with all this nifty technology, we still have multiple off-line backups today.
Note: On-line backups / Data replication to a secondary Data Centre can be corrupted too in this way
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Bartek Chlebek is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492802%2fzfs-how-could-my-file-got-permanently-corrupted%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You do understand that if any single non-RAIDed drive has a failure, you lose data and the same is true if one of the non-ECC memory chips has a failure: you lose data.
And even if you have:
- dual processors
- dual NICs
- dual hard drives
- ECC memory
- High-availability fail-over servers in a different data centre on a different continent
...any kind of uncorrectable error (Bug, human, Electro-Magnetic Pulse, .. ) can still lead to data loss.
And that's why, with all this nifty technology, we still have multiple off-line backups today.
Note: On-line backups / Data replication to a secondary Data Centre can be corrupted too in this way
add a comment |
You do understand that if any single non-RAIDed drive has a failure, you lose data and the same is true if one of the non-ECC memory chips has a failure: you lose data.
And even if you have:
- dual processors
- dual NICs
- dual hard drives
- ECC memory
- High-availability fail-over servers in a different data centre on a different continent
...any kind of uncorrectable error (Bug, human, Electro-Magnetic Pulse, .. ) can still lead to data loss.
And that's why, with all this nifty technology, we still have multiple off-line backups today.
Note: On-line backups / Data replication to a secondary Data Centre can be corrupted too in this way
add a comment |
You do understand that if any single non-RAIDed drive has a failure, you lose data and the same is true if one of the non-ECC memory chips has a failure: you lose data.
And even if you have:
- dual processors
- dual NICs
- dual hard drives
- ECC memory
- High-availability fail-over servers in a different data centre on a different continent
...any kind of uncorrectable error (Bug, human, Electro-Magnetic Pulse, .. ) can still lead to data loss.
And that's why, with all this nifty technology, we still have multiple off-line backups today.
Note: On-line backups / Data replication to a secondary Data Centre can be corrupted too in this way
You do understand that if any single non-RAIDed drive has a failure, you lose data and the same is true if one of the non-ECC memory chips has a failure: you lose data.
And even if you have:
- dual processors
- dual NICs
- dual hard drives
- ECC memory
- High-availability fail-over servers in a different data centre on a different continent
...any kind of uncorrectable error (Bug, human, Electro-Magnetic Pulse, .. ) can still lead to data loss.
And that's why, with all this nifty technology, we still have multiple off-line backups today.
Note: On-line backups / Data replication to a secondary Data Centre can be corrupted too in this way
edited 4 mins ago
answered 10 mins ago
Fabby
3,68511228
3,68511228
add a comment |
add a comment |
Bartek Chlebek is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bartek Chlebek is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bartek Chlebek is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bartek Chlebek is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492802%2fzfs-how-could-my-file-got-permanently-corrupted%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown