PSTricks: Newly introduced error in package
Consider the following MWE:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pstricks}
begin{document}
A
end{document}
It produces the error
Runaway argument?
] {pgffor.code.tex}
! Paragraph ended before ProvidesPackageRCS@i was complete.
<to be read again>
par
l.11
How do I fix this?
pstricks compilation-error
|
show 6 more comments
Consider the following MWE:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pstricks}
begin{document}
A
end{document}
It produces the error
Runaway argument?
] {pgffor.code.tex}
! Paragraph ended before ProvidesPackageRCS@i was complete.
<to be read again>
par
l.11
How do I fix this?
pstricks compilation-error
1
The only way currently imho is to go back to an older pgf version until pstricks is fixed (I wrote the author already)
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer Hi Ulrike. Thanks for the answer. Do you know where I can find an older version of PGF?:-)
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
1
You could try to replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
bydefProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer That did the trick. Thank you very much!
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer: To whom do you send a bug report?
– Herbert
1 hour ago
|
show 6 more comments
Consider the following MWE:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pstricks}
begin{document}
A
end{document}
It produces the error
Runaway argument?
] {pgffor.code.tex}
! Paragraph ended before ProvidesPackageRCS@i was complete.
<to be read again>
par
l.11
How do I fix this?
pstricks compilation-error
Consider the following MWE:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pstricks}
begin{document}
A
end{document}
It produces the error
Runaway argument?
] {pgffor.code.tex}
! Paragraph ended before ProvidesPackageRCS@i was complete.
<to be read again>
par
l.11
How do I fix this?
pstricks compilation-error
pstricks compilation-error
asked 2 hours ago
Svend TveskægSvend Tveskæg
20.7k1050137
20.7k1050137
1
The only way currently imho is to go back to an older pgf version until pstricks is fixed (I wrote the author already)
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer Hi Ulrike. Thanks for the answer. Do you know where I can find an older version of PGF?:-)
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
1
You could try to replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
bydefProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer That did the trick. Thank you very much!
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer: To whom do you send a bug report?
– Herbert
1 hour ago
|
show 6 more comments
1
The only way currently imho is to go back to an older pgf version until pstricks is fixed (I wrote the author already)
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer Hi Ulrike. Thanks for the answer. Do you know where I can find an older version of PGF?:-)
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
1
You could try to replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
bydefProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer That did the trick. Thank you very much!
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer: To whom do you send a bug report?
– Herbert
1 hour ago
1
1
The only way currently imho is to go back to an older pgf version until pstricks is fixed (I wrote the author already)
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
The only way currently imho is to go back to an older pgf version until pstricks is fixed (I wrote the author already)
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer Hi Ulrike. Thanks for the answer. Do you know where I can find an older version of PGF?
:-)
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer Hi Ulrike. Thanks for the answer. Do you know where I can find an older version of PGF?
:-)
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
1
1
You could try to replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
You could try to replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer That did the trick. Thank you very much!
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer That did the trick. Thank you very much!
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer: To whom do you send a bug report?
– Herbert
1 hour ago
@UlrikeFischer: To whom do you send a bug report?
– Herbert
1 hour ago
|
show 6 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Until pstricks has been adapted to the new pgf version you could try to
replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by
defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
add a comment |
use pstricks.tex
from http://archiv.dante.de/~herbert/texnik/tex/generic/pstricks/
or wait one or two days for the update. It has a slightly other solution.
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version ofpstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.
– Herbert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469005%2fpstricks-newly-introduced-error-in-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Until pstricks has been adapted to the new pgf version you could try to
replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by
defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
add a comment |
Until pstricks has been adapted to the new pgf version you could try to
replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by
defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
add a comment |
Until pstricks has been adapted to the new pgf version you could try to
replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by
defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
Until pstricks has been adapted to the new pgf version you could try to
replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
by
defProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
answered 2 hours ago
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
187k7291671
187k7291671
add a comment |
add a comment |
use pstricks.tex
from http://archiv.dante.de/~herbert/texnik/tex/generic/pstricks/
or wait one or two days for the update. It has a slightly other solution.
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version ofpstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.
– Herbert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
use pstricks.tex
from http://archiv.dante.de/~herbert/texnik/tex/generic/pstricks/
or wait one or two days for the update. It has a slightly other solution.
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version ofpstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.
– Herbert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
use pstricks.tex
from http://archiv.dante.de/~herbert/texnik/tex/generic/pstricks/
or wait one or two days for the update. It has a slightly other solution.
use pstricks.tex
from http://archiv.dante.de/~herbert/texnik/tex/generic/pstricks/
or wait one or two days for the update. It has a slightly other solution.
answered 1 hour ago
HerbertHerbert
270k24408717
270k24408717
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version ofpstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.
– Herbert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version ofpstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.
– Herbert
1 hour ago
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
I didn't try to make a real solution - suppressing all message are naturally not right.
– Ulrike Fischer
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version of
pstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.– Herbert
1 hour ago
There is only a problem, if someone uses a development version of
pstricks.tex
and an old pgf. Later it will be the same as you already suggested.– Herbert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469005%2fpstricks-newly-introduced-error-in-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The only way currently imho is to go back to an older pgf version until pstricks is fixed (I wrote the author already)
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer Hi Ulrike. Thanks for the answer. Do you know where I can find an older version of PGF?
:-)
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
1
You could try to replace in a local copy of pstricks.tex (you find it in tex/generic)
defProvidesPackageRCS{@ifnextchar[ProvidesPackageRCS@i{ProvidesPackageRCS@i }}%$
bydefProvidesPackageRCS#1{}
– Ulrike Fischer
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer That did the trick. Thank you very much!
– Svend Tveskæg
2 hours ago
@UlrikeFischer: To whom do you send a bug report?
– Herbert
1 hour ago