Routing over Gateway
I have a very basic question about a routing issue I have right know.
So my central server with the ip 10.0.0.1 of my own network is the router for the ip net 10.0.0.0/25.
On the client 10.0.0.100 I have a WiFi connection to an access point which serves the ip net 172.20.10.0/25.
How is it possible that I can add a route to 10.0.0.1 so all clients of the 10.0.0.0./25 network can reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network?
What I have tested so far (ipv4 forwarding and iptables masquerading has been taken care for):
Adding the a route on 10.0.0.1 like
route add -net 172.20.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.128 dev br0
makes it possible on 10.0.0.1 to reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network, but thats it. A traceroute from any other client shows that the requests gets stuck at 10.0.0.1 and therefore they can not reach the other network until I configure the same route on all of them individually. But this contradicts the idea of 10.0.0.1 being the gateway.
The routing table of 10.0.0.1 after using the above noted command looks like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 <WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 br0
<WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.10.0 10.0.0.100 255.255.255.128 UG 0 0 0 br0
What am I missing here?
Thank you very much for your time and answers to this probably very silly issue!
linux routing route
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have a very basic question about a routing issue I have right know.
So my central server with the ip 10.0.0.1 of my own network is the router for the ip net 10.0.0.0/25.
On the client 10.0.0.100 I have a WiFi connection to an access point which serves the ip net 172.20.10.0/25.
How is it possible that I can add a route to 10.0.0.1 so all clients of the 10.0.0.0./25 network can reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network?
What I have tested so far (ipv4 forwarding and iptables masquerading has been taken care for):
Adding the a route on 10.0.0.1 like
route add -net 172.20.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.128 dev br0
makes it possible on 10.0.0.1 to reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network, but thats it. A traceroute from any other client shows that the requests gets stuck at 10.0.0.1 and therefore they can not reach the other network until I configure the same route on all of them individually. But this contradicts the idea of 10.0.0.1 being the gateway.
The routing table of 10.0.0.1 after using the above noted command looks like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 <WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 br0
<WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.10.0 10.0.0.100 255.255.255.128 UG 0 0 0 br0
What am I missing here?
Thank you very much for your time and answers to this probably very silly issue!
linux routing route
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have a very basic question about a routing issue I have right know.
So my central server with the ip 10.0.0.1 of my own network is the router for the ip net 10.0.0.0/25.
On the client 10.0.0.100 I have a WiFi connection to an access point which serves the ip net 172.20.10.0/25.
How is it possible that I can add a route to 10.0.0.1 so all clients of the 10.0.0.0./25 network can reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network?
What I have tested so far (ipv4 forwarding and iptables masquerading has been taken care for):
Adding the a route on 10.0.0.1 like
route add -net 172.20.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.128 dev br0
makes it possible on 10.0.0.1 to reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network, but thats it. A traceroute from any other client shows that the requests gets stuck at 10.0.0.1 and therefore they can not reach the other network until I configure the same route on all of them individually. But this contradicts the idea of 10.0.0.1 being the gateway.
The routing table of 10.0.0.1 after using the above noted command looks like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 <WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 br0
<WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.10.0 10.0.0.100 255.255.255.128 UG 0 0 0 br0
What am I missing here?
Thank you very much for your time and answers to this probably very silly issue!
linux routing route
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have a very basic question about a routing issue I have right know.
So my central server with the ip 10.0.0.1 of my own network is the router for the ip net 10.0.0.0/25.
On the client 10.0.0.100 I have a WiFi connection to an access point which serves the ip net 172.20.10.0/25.
How is it possible that I can add a route to 10.0.0.1 so all clients of the 10.0.0.0./25 network can reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network?
What I have tested so far (ipv4 forwarding and iptables masquerading has been taken care for):
Adding the a route on 10.0.0.1 like
route add -net 172.20.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.128 dev br0
makes it possible on 10.0.0.1 to reach the 172.20.10.0/25 network, but thats it. A traceroute from any other client shows that the requests gets stuck at 10.0.0.1 and therefore they can not reach the other network until I configure the same route on all of them individually. But this contradicts the idea of 10.0.0.1 being the gateway.
The routing table of 10.0.0.1 after using the above noted command looks like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 <WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 br0
<WANIP IS HERE> 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.10.0 10.0.0.100 255.255.255.128 UG 0 0 0 br0
What am I missing here?
Thank you very much for your time and answers to this probably very silly issue!
linux routing route
linux routing route
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
asked 2 mins ago
Daniel MessnerDaniel Messner
1
1
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Daniel Messner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Daniel Messner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493140%2frouting-over-gateway%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Daniel Messner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Daniel Messner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Daniel Messner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Daniel Messner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493140%2frouting-over-gateway%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
