Why don't FAT filesystems support links?












0














FAT filesystems represent files via linked lists of clusters (linked file allocation).



They have a region on disk for one or more tables (File Allocation Table) which have as many entries as addressable clusters. Each entry can be:




  • a pointer to the next cluster in a file's linked list

  • a marker to indicate the last cluster of a linked list

  • an Unused marker

  • a Bad marker


For symbolic links, my guess is that the FAT can not point to or store a file path as ext filesystems do. The closest thing I can think of would be to point to the head of a linked list, which would require some sort of maintenance.



For hard links, FAT filesystems lack a file node that can be 'shared' among files. There would also be no way to keep track of the number of links to a file.










share|improve this question
























  • Please don't use the "primarily opinion-based" close vote excuse for questions that ask for design rationale. The designers may have decided some things on a whim, or based on their opinion of how things should be, but even if so, what happened can be described as fact. It's not based on the opinions on whoever answers any longer.
    – ilkkachu
    46 secs ago
















0














FAT filesystems represent files via linked lists of clusters (linked file allocation).



They have a region on disk for one or more tables (File Allocation Table) which have as many entries as addressable clusters. Each entry can be:




  • a pointer to the next cluster in a file's linked list

  • a marker to indicate the last cluster of a linked list

  • an Unused marker

  • a Bad marker


For symbolic links, my guess is that the FAT can not point to or store a file path as ext filesystems do. The closest thing I can think of would be to point to the head of a linked list, which would require some sort of maintenance.



For hard links, FAT filesystems lack a file node that can be 'shared' among files. There would also be no way to keep track of the number of links to a file.










share|improve this question
























  • Please don't use the "primarily opinion-based" close vote excuse for questions that ask for design rationale. The designers may have decided some things on a whim, or based on their opinion of how things should be, but even if so, what happened can be described as fact. It's not based on the opinions on whoever answers any longer.
    – ilkkachu
    46 secs ago














0












0








0







FAT filesystems represent files via linked lists of clusters (linked file allocation).



They have a region on disk for one or more tables (File Allocation Table) which have as many entries as addressable clusters. Each entry can be:




  • a pointer to the next cluster in a file's linked list

  • a marker to indicate the last cluster of a linked list

  • an Unused marker

  • a Bad marker


For symbolic links, my guess is that the FAT can not point to or store a file path as ext filesystems do. The closest thing I can think of would be to point to the head of a linked list, which would require some sort of maintenance.



For hard links, FAT filesystems lack a file node that can be 'shared' among files. There would also be no way to keep track of the number of links to a file.










share|improve this question















FAT filesystems represent files via linked lists of clusters (linked file allocation).



They have a region on disk for one or more tables (File Allocation Table) which have as many entries as addressable clusters. Each entry can be:




  • a pointer to the next cluster in a file's linked list

  • a marker to indicate the last cluster of a linked list

  • an Unused marker

  • a Bad marker


For symbolic links, my guess is that the FAT can not point to or store a file path as ext filesystems do. The closest thing I can think of would be to point to the head of a linked list, which would require some sort of maintenance.



For hard links, FAT filesystems lack a file node that can be 'shared' among files. There would also be no way to keep track of the number of links to a file.







filesystems symlink hard-link fat






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 mins ago









Rui F Ribeiro

39.2k1479130




39.2k1479130










asked 10 mins ago









juancho

61




61












  • Please don't use the "primarily opinion-based" close vote excuse for questions that ask for design rationale. The designers may have decided some things on a whim, or based on their opinion of how things should be, but even if so, what happened can be described as fact. It's not based on the opinions on whoever answers any longer.
    – ilkkachu
    46 secs ago


















  • Please don't use the "primarily opinion-based" close vote excuse for questions that ask for design rationale. The designers may have decided some things on a whim, or based on their opinion of how things should be, but even if so, what happened can be described as fact. It's not based on the opinions on whoever answers any longer.
    – ilkkachu
    46 secs ago
















Please don't use the "primarily opinion-based" close vote excuse for questions that ask for design rationale. The designers may have decided some things on a whim, or based on their opinion of how things should be, but even if so, what happened can be described as fact. It's not based on the opinions on whoever answers any longer.
– ilkkachu
46 secs ago




Please don't use the "primarily opinion-based" close vote excuse for questions that ask for design rationale. The designers may have decided some things on a whim, or based on their opinion of how things should be, but even if so, what happened can be described as fact. It's not based on the opinions on whoever answers any longer.
– ilkkachu
46 secs ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492698%2fwhy-dont-fat-filesystems-support-links%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492698%2fwhy-dont-fat-filesystems-support-links%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

宮崎県

濃尾地震

シテ島