Equivalence principle before Einstein












3












$begingroup$


In an german interview some physicist were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he was alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This looks like it could be a better fit on SE.HistoryOfScienceAndMathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    1 hour ago
















3












$begingroup$


In an german interview some physicist were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he was alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This looks like it could be a better fit on SE.HistoryOfScienceAndMathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    1 hour ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


In an german interview some physicist were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he was alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In an german interview some physicist were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he was alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.







mass history equivalence-principle






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 54 mins ago









Qmechanic

107k121991239




107k121991239










asked 1 hour ago









MaximMaxim

1375




1375








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This looks like it could be a better fit on SE.HistoryOfScienceAndMathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    1 hour ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This looks like it could be a better fit on SE.HistoryOfScienceAndMathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    1 hour ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
$endgroup$
– hyportnex
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
$endgroup$
– hyportnex
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
"And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
$endgroup$
– Gert
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
"And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
$endgroup$
– Gert
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
$endgroup$
– Gert
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
$endgroup$
– Gert
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
This looks like it could be a better fit on SE.HistoryOfScienceAndMathematics.
$endgroup$
– Nat
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
This looks like it could be a better fit on SE.HistoryOfScienceAndMathematics.
$endgroup$
– Nat
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470954%2fequivalence-principle-before-einstein%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



    Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



    Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



    Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



      Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



      Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



      Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



        Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



        Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



        Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



        Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



        Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



        Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Ben CrowellBen Crowell

        53.8k6165313




        53.8k6165313






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470954%2fequivalence-principle-before-einstein%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            CARDNET

            Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

            濃尾地震