Portable way to invoke tar with a list of files from stdin
I want to create a .tgz from the content of a directory. I also want to strip the leading "./
" from the tar'ed content.
I had done this as follows:
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | xargs czf /path/to/tgz/myTgz.tgz
I learned recently that using xargs
may not be the best way to pull this off because xargs
may invoke tar
multiple times if the cmdline arg list gets too long, and I was advised to make use of tar
's ability to read a list of input files from stdin. I ended up finding this article on how to do this. However, I find that the recommendation...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | tar czf foo.tgz -T -
...seems to not be portable. It runs fine on my dev PC, but on a busybox target, I get the following error from running the same command:
tar: can't open '-': No such file or directory
So, my question: is there a truly portable/global way to invoke tar
to create a .tgz
by feeding it input files from stdin (as opposed to cmdline arguments)?
(It is not an option available to me to install alternatives to tar
such as gnutar
/bsdtar
/etc.)
(Secondary question: Why does the "-T -
" argument to tar
denote "read files from stdin
"? From the tar
man page, all I could find was that "-T
" means:
get names to extract or create from FILE
... but I couldn't see any reference to a plain "-
")
io-redirection tar busybox stdin options
|
show 1 more comment
I want to create a .tgz from the content of a directory. I also want to strip the leading "./
" from the tar'ed content.
I had done this as follows:
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | xargs czf /path/to/tgz/myTgz.tgz
I learned recently that using xargs
may not be the best way to pull this off because xargs
may invoke tar
multiple times if the cmdline arg list gets too long, and I was advised to make use of tar
's ability to read a list of input files from stdin. I ended up finding this article on how to do this. However, I find that the recommendation...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | tar czf foo.tgz -T -
...seems to not be portable. It runs fine on my dev PC, but on a busybox target, I get the following error from running the same command:
tar: can't open '-': No such file or directory
So, my question: is there a truly portable/global way to invoke tar
to create a .tgz
by feeding it input files from stdin (as opposed to cmdline arguments)?
(It is not an option available to me to install alternatives to tar
such as gnutar
/bsdtar
/etc.)
(Secondary question: Why does the "-T -
" argument to tar
denote "read files from stdin
"? From the tar
man page, all I could find was that "-T
" means:
get names to extract or create from FILE
... but I couldn't see any reference to a plain "-
")
io-redirection tar busybox stdin options
3
See Usage of dash (-) in place of a filename.
– Michael Homer
8 hours ago
2
Sincetar
is not a POSIX utility, a truly portable (as in "standard") implementation may not be found.pax
, on the other hand, is a POSIX utility.
– Kusalananda
8 hours ago
This site does one question per question, and that tertiary question is a massive distraction that is a question in its own right, most likely already long since covered.
– JdeBP
8 hours ago
@JdeBP - removed tertiary question
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@Kusalananda - that's an informative comment; thank you. However, it looks likepax
isn't available in Busybox (at least in the version of Busybox I have to work with). I think I may have to resign myself to using the sub-optimal approach usingxargs
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I want to create a .tgz from the content of a directory. I also want to strip the leading "./
" from the tar'ed content.
I had done this as follows:
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | xargs czf /path/to/tgz/myTgz.tgz
I learned recently that using xargs
may not be the best way to pull this off because xargs
may invoke tar
multiple times if the cmdline arg list gets too long, and I was advised to make use of tar
's ability to read a list of input files from stdin. I ended up finding this article on how to do this. However, I find that the recommendation...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | tar czf foo.tgz -T -
...seems to not be portable. It runs fine on my dev PC, but on a busybox target, I get the following error from running the same command:
tar: can't open '-': No such file or directory
So, my question: is there a truly portable/global way to invoke tar
to create a .tgz
by feeding it input files from stdin (as opposed to cmdline arguments)?
(It is not an option available to me to install alternatives to tar
such as gnutar
/bsdtar
/etc.)
(Secondary question: Why does the "-T -
" argument to tar
denote "read files from stdin
"? From the tar
man page, all I could find was that "-T
" means:
get names to extract or create from FILE
... but I couldn't see any reference to a plain "-
")
io-redirection tar busybox stdin options
I want to create a .tgz from the content of a directory. I also want to strip the leading "./
" from the tar'ed content.
I had done this as follows:
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | xargs czf /path/to/tgz/myTgz.tgz
I learned recently that using xargs
may not be the best way to pull this off because xargs
may invoke tar
multiple times if the cmdline arg list gets too long, and I was advised to make use of tar
's ability to read a list of input files from stdin. I ended up finding this article on how to do this. However, I find that the recommendation...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- | tar czf foo.tgz -T -
...seems to not be portable. It runs fine on my dev PC, but on a busybox target, I get the following error from running the same command:
tar: can't open '-': No such file or directory
So, my question: is there a truly portable/global way to invoke tar
to create a .tgz
by feeding it input files from stdin (as opposed to cmdline arguments)?
(It is not an option available to me to install alternatives to tar
such as gnutar
/bsdtar
/etc.)
(Secondary question: Why does the "-T -
" argument to tar
denote "read files from stdin
"? From the tar
man page, all I could find was that "-T
" means:
get names to extract or create from FILE
... but I couldn't see any reference to a plain "-
")
io-redirection tar busybox stdin options
io-redirection tar busybox stdin options
edited 7 hours ago
Gilles
529k12810601585
529k12810601585
asked 8 hours ago
StoneThrow
442413
442413
3
See Usage of dash (-) in place of a filename.
– Michael Homer
8 hours ago
2
Sincetar
is not a POSIX utility, a truly portable (as in "standard") implementation may not be found.pax
, on the other hand, is a POSIX utility.
– Kusalananda
8 hours ago
This site does one question per question, and that tertiary question is a massive distraction that is a question in its own right, most likely already long since covered.
– JdeBP
8 hours ago
@JdeBP - removed tertiary question
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@Kusalananda - that's an informative comment; thank you. However, it looks likepax
isn't available in Busybox (at least in the version of Busybox I have to work with). I think I may have to resign myself to using the sub-optimal approach usingxargs
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
3
See Usage of dash (-) in place of a filename.
– Michael Homer
8 hours ago
2
Sincetar
is not a POSIX utility, a truly portable (as in "standard") implementation may not be found.pax
, on the other hand, is a POSIX utility.
– Kusalananda
8 hours ago
This site does one question per question, and that tertiary question is a massive distraction that is a question in its own right, most likely already long since covered.
– JdeBP
8 hours ago
@JdeBP - removed tertiary question
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@Kusalananda - that's an informative comment; thank you. However, it looks likepax
isn't available in Busybox (at least in the version of Busybox I have to work with). I think I may have to resign myself to using the sub-optimal approach usingxargs
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
3
3
See Usage of dash (-) in place of a filename.
– Michael Homer
8 hours ago
See Usage of dash (-) in place of a filename.
– Michael Homer
8 hours ago
2
2
Since
tar
is not a POSIX utility, a truly portable (as in "standard") implementation may not be found. pax
, on the other hand, is a POSIX utility.– Kusalananda
8 hours ago
Since
tar
is not a POSIX utility, a truly portable (as in "standard") implementation may not be found. pax
, on the other hand, is a POSIX utility.– Kusalananda
8 hours ago
This site does one question per question, and that tertiary question is a massive distraction that is a question in its own right, most likely already long since covered.
– JdeBP
8 hours ago
This site does one question per question, and that tertiary question is a massive distraction that is a question in its own right, most likely already long since covered.
– JdeBP
8 hours ago
@JdeBP - removed tertiary question
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@JdeBP - removed tertiary question
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@Kusalananda - that's an informative comment; thank you. However, it looks like
pax
isn't available in Busybox (at least in the version of Busybox I have to work with). I think I may have to resign myself to using the sub-optimal approach using xargs
.– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@Kusalananda - that's an informative comment; thank you. However, it looks like
pax
isn't available in Busybox (at least in the version of Busybox I have to work with). I think I may have to resign myself to using the sub-optimal approach using xargs
.– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
It is a common convention to interpret -
to mean standard input where an input file name is expected, and to mean standard output where an output file name is expected. Because this is a common convention, the short help summary in the GNU tar man page does not mention it, but the complete manual (usually available locally through info tar
) does. The POSIX command line utility syntax guidelines includes this convention, so it's pretty widespread (but it's always a choice on the part of the author of the program).
BusyBox utilities do follow this convention. But the manual does not mention tar
as supporting the option -T
, and neither does the version on the machine I'm posting this (1.27.2 on Ubuntu). I don't know why you're getting the error “: No such file or directory” rather than “invalid option -- 'T'”. It seems that your tar
interprets -T
as an option that does not take an argument, then sees -
as a file name. Since in this context tar needs a file name to put in the archive, and not just some content that comes from a file, it would not make sense to use the stdin/stdout interpretation for -
.
BusyBox utilities support a restricted set of functionality by design, because they're intended for embedded systems where the fancier features of GNU utilities wouldn't fit. Apparently -T
is not a feature that the BusyBox designers considered useful.
I don't think BusyBox tar has any way to read file names from stdin. If you need to archive a subset of the files in a directory and you don't need any symbolic links in the archive, a workaround is to create a forest of symbolic links in a temporary directory and archive this temporary directory.
It's not clear exactly why you're using find
. If you only want the files in the current directory, why not tar czf /path/to/archive.tgz -- *
? Your command does make sense if there are subdirectories and you want to archive the files in these subdirectories, but not the directories themselves (presumably to restore them in a place where the directory structure must exist but may have different permissions). In this case a leading ./
wouldn't do any harm.
add a comment |
I know that is a stupid answer and maybe not good for you but how bad is if you just...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- >/tmp/temp.txt
tar czf foo.tgz -T /tmp/temp.txt
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this fromstdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE:xargs
callingtar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You can use the -u/--update
option in conjunction with xargs
.
I just tried and to prove that it works, I gave the filename arguments to tar
one-by-one using xargs -n 1
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs -n 1 tar -uf archive.tar
Of course, this is just a proof of concept. In your case, it is probably more practical to allow xargs
to separate the argument list into larger parts that do not exceed the argument length limit, so as to avoid having a lot of calls to tar
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs tar -uf archive.tar
The prerequisite is that all implementations of tar
on your platforms support at least one of the -u/--update
flags.
EDIT: the -u/--update
flags allow tar
to create as well as append to an archive.
I just noticed that unfortunately, you cannot update compressed archives (tgz, created with the -c
flag). However, you can, by all means create a non-compressed archive first and then compress the results.
Also, it should not confuse you that I'm using flags to tar
with a hyphen ('-' character). It accepts both forms. In my example, -uf
would be equivalent to uf
in yours.
As for the -
option, it is probalby not documented in the man page of tar
because it is a very common Unix convention for command line tools that deal with streams as well as named files.
-
is usually a special argument for filters and names the standard input stream as a file.
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version oftar
does not support-u
/-update
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.
– Gilles
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492308%2fportable-way-to-invoke-tar-with-a-list-of-files-from-stdin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is a common convention to interpret -
to mean standard input where an input file name is expected, and to mean standard output where an output file name is expected. Because this is a common convention, the short help summary in the GNU tar man page does not mention it, but the complete manual (usually available locally through info tar
) does. The POSIX command line utility syntax guidelines includes this convention, so it's pretty widespread (but it's always a choice on the part of the author of the program).
BusyBox utilities do follow this convention. But the manual does not mention tar
as supporting the option -T
, and neither does the version on the machine I'm posting this (1.27.2 on Ubuntu). I don't know why you're getting the error “: No such file or directory” rather than “invalid option -- 'T'”. It seems that your tar
interprets -T
as an option that does not take an argument, then sees -
as a file name. Since in this context tar needs a file name to put in the archive, and not just some content that comes from a file, it would not make sense to use the stdin/stdout interpretation for -
.
BusyBox utilities support a restricted set of functionality by design, because they're intended for embedded systems where the fancier features of GNU utilities wouldn't fit. Apparently -T
is not a feature that the BusyBox designers considered useful.
I don't think BusyBox tar has any way to read file names from stdin. If you need to archive a subset of the files in a directory and you don't need any symbolic links in the archive, a workaround is to create a forest of symbolic links in a temporary directory and archive this temporary directory.
It's not clear exactly why you're using find
. If you only want the files in the current directory, why not tar czf /path/to/archive.tgz -- *
? Your command does make sense if there are subdirectories and you want to archive the files in these subdirectories, but not the directories themselves (presumably to restore them in a place where the directory structure must exist but may have different permissions). In this case a leading ./
wouldn't do any harm.
add a comment |
It is a common convention to interpret -
to mean standard input where an input file name is expected, and to mean standard output where an output file name is expected. Because this is a common convention, the short help summary in the GNU tar man page does not mention it, but the complete manual (usually available locally through info tar
) does. The POSIX command line utility syntax guidelines includes this convention, so it's pretty widespread (but it's always a choice on the part of the author of the program).
BusyBox utilities do follow this convention. But the manual does not mention tar
as supporting the option -T
, and neither does the version on the machine I'm posting this (1.27.2 on Ubuntu). I don't know why you're getting the error “: No such file or directory” rather than “invalid option -- 'T'”. It seems that your tar
interprets -T
as an option that does not take an argument, then sees -
as a file name. Since in this context tar needs a file name to put in the archive, and not just some content that comes from a file, it would not make sense to use the stdin/stdout interpretation for -
.
BusyBox utilities support a restricted set of functionality by design, because they're intended for embedded systems where the fancier features of GNU utilities wouldn't fit. Apparently -T
is not a feature that the BusyBox designers considered useful.
I don't think BusyBox tar has any way to read file names from stdin. If you need to archive a subset of the files in a directory and you don't need any symbolic links in the archive, a workaround is to create a forest of symbolic links in a temporary directory and archive this temporary directory.
It's not clear exactly why you're using find
. If you only want the files in the current directory, why not tar czf /path/to/archive.tgz -- *
? Your command does make sense if there are subdirectories and you want to archive the files in these subdirectories, but not the directories themselves (presumably to restore them in a place where the directory structure must exist but may have different permissions). In this case a leading ./
wouldn't do any harm.
add a comment |
It is a common convention to interpret -
to mean standard input where an input file name is expected, and to mean standard output where an output file name is expected. Because this is a common convention, the short help summary in the GNU tar man page does not mention it, but the complete manual (usually available locally through info tar
) does. The POSIX command line utility syntax guidelines includes this convention, so it's pretty widespread (but it's always a choice on the part of the author of the program).
BusyBox utilities do follow this convention. But the manual does not mention tar
as supporting the option -T
, and neither does the version on the machine I'm posting this (1.27.2 on Ubuntu). I don't know why you're getting the error “: No such file or directory” rather than “invalid option -- 'T'”. It seems that your tar
interprets -T
as an option that does not take an argument, then sees -
as a file name. Since in this context tar needs a file name to put in the archive, and not just some content that comes from a file, it would not make sense to use the stdin/stdout interpretation for -
.
BusyBox utilities support a restricted set of functionality by design, because they're intended for embedded systems where the fancier features of GNU utilities wouldn't fit. Apparently -T
is not a feature that the BusyBox designers considered useful.
I don't think BusyBox tar has any way to read file names from stdin. If you need to archive a subset of the files in a directory and you don't need any symbolic links in the archive, a workaround is to create a forest of symbolic links in a temporary directory and archive this temporary directory.
It's not clear exactly why you're using find
. If you only want the files in the current directory, why not tar czf /path/to/archive.tgz -- *
? Your command does make sense if there are subdirectories and you want to archive the files in these subdirectories, but not the directories themselves (presumably to restore them in a place where the directory structure must exist but may have different permissions). In this case a leading ./
wouldn't do any harm.
It is a common convention to interpret -
to mean standard input where an input file name is expected, and to mean standard output where an output file name is expected. Because this is a common convention, the short help summary in the GNU tar man page does not mention it, but the complete manual (usually available locally through info tar
) does. The POSIX command line utility syntax guidelines includes this convention, so it's pretty widespread (but it's always a choice on the part of the author of the program).
BusyBox utilities do follow this convention. But the manual does not mention tar
as supporting the option -T
, and neither does the version on the machine I'm posting this (1.27.2 on Ubuntu). I don't know why you're getting the error “: No such file or directory” rather than “invalid option -- 'T'”. It seems that your tar
interprets -T
as an option that does not take an argument, then sees -
as a file name. Since in this context tar needs a file name to put in the archive, and not just some content that comes from a file, it would not make sense to use the stdin/stdout interpretation for -
.
BusyBox utilities support a restricted set of functionality by design, because they're intended for embedded systems where the fancier features of GNU utilities wouldn't fit. Apparently -T
is not a feature that the BusyBox designers considered useful.
I don't think BusyBox tar has any way to read file names from stdin. If you need to archive a subset of the files in a directory and you don't need any symbolic links in the archive, a workaround is to create a forest of symbolic links in a temporary directory and archive this temporary directory.
It's not clear exactly why you're using find
. If you only want the files in the current directory, why not tar czf /path/to/archive.tgz -- *
? Your command does make sense if there are subdirectories and you want to archive the files in these subdirectories, but not the directories themselves (presumably to restore them in a place where the directory structure must exist but may have different permissions). In this case a leading ./
wouldn't do any harm.
answered 7 hours ago
Gilles
529k12810601585
529k12810601585
add a comment |
add a comment |
I know that is a stupid answer and maybe not good for you but how bad is if you just...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- >/tmp/temp.txt
tar czf foo.tgz -T /tmp/temp.txt
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this fromstdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE:xargs
callingtar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I know that is a stupid answer and maybe not good for you but how bad is if you just...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- >/tmp/temp.txt
tar czf foo.tgz -T /tmp/temp.txt
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this fromstdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE:xargs
callingtar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I know that is a stupid answer and maybe not good for you but how bad is if you just...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- >/tmp/temp.txt
tar czf foo.tgz -T /tmp/temp.txt
I know that is a stupid answer and maybe not good for you but how bad is if you just...
cd /path/to/files/ && find . -type f | cut -c 3- >/tmp/temp.txt
tar czf foo.tgz -T /tmp/temp.txt
answered 7 hours ago
Luciano Andress Martini
3,533931
3,533931
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this fromstdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE:xargs
callingtar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this fromstdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE:xargs
callingtar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this from
stdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE: xargs
calling tar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
Not at all a stupid answer. The original question (and the reason why I asked if this was possible to do this from
stdin
) was because of the problem I noted RE: xargs
calling tar
multiple times if the input list is too long...does this solution also bypass that problem? (it seems like it does because it's also using "-T
", not explicitly putting the source files as command-line arguments)– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You can use the -u/--update
option in conjunction with xargs
.
I just tried and to prove that it works, I gave the filename arguments to tar
one-by-one using xargs -n 1
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs -n 1 tar -uf archive.tar
Of course, this is just a proof of concept. In your case, it is probably more practical to allow xargs
to separate the argument list into larger parts that do not exceed the argument length limit, so as to avoid having a lot of calls to tar
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs tar -uf archive.tar
The prerequisite is that all implementations of tar
on your platforms support at least one of the -u/--update
flags.
EDIT: the -u/--update
flags allow tar
to create as well as append to an archive.
I just noticed that unfortunately, you cannot update compressed archives (tgz, created with the -c
flag). However, you can, by all means create a non-compressed archive first and then compress the results.
Also, it should not confuse you that I'm using flags to tar
with a hyphen ('-' character). It accepts both forms. In my example, -uf
would be equivalent to uf
in yours.
As for the -
option, it is probalby not documented in the man page of tar
because it is a very common Unix convention for command line tools that deal with streams as well as named files.
-
is usually a special argument for filters and names the standard input stream as a file.
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version oftar
does not support-u
/-update
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.
– Gilles
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You can use the -u/--update
option in conjunction with xargs
.
I just tried and to prove that it works, I gave the filename arguments to tar
one-by-one using xargs -n 1
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs -n 1 tar -uf archive.tar
Of course, this is just a proof of concept. In your case, it is probably more practical to allow xargs
to separate the argument list into larger parts that do not exceed the argument length limit, so as to avoid having a lot of calls to tar
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs tar -uf archive.tar
The prerequisite is that all implementations of tar
on your platforms support at least one of the -u/--update
flags.
EDIT: the -u/--update
flags allow tar
to create as well as append to an archive.
I just noticed that unfortunately, you cannot update compressed archives (tgz, created with the -c
flag). However, you can, by all means create a non-compressed archive first and then compress the results.
Also, it should not confuse you that I'm using flags to tar
with a hyphen ('-' character). It accepts both forms. In my example, -uf
would be equivalent to uf
in yours.
As for the -
option, it is probalby not documented in the man page of tar
because it is a very common Unix convention for command line tools that deal with streams as well as named files.
-
is usually a special argument for filters and names the standard input stream as a file.
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version oftar
does not support-u
/-update
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.
– Gilles
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You can use the -u/--update
option in conjunction with xargs
.
I just tried and to prove that it works, I gave the filename arguments to tar
one-by-one using xargs -n 1
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs -n 1 tar -uf archive.tar
Of course, this is just a proof of concept. In your case, it is probably more practical to allow xargs
to separate the argument list into larger parts that do not exceed the argument length limit, so as to avoid having a lot of calls to tar
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs tar -uf archive.tar
The prerequisite is that all implementations of tar
on your platforms support at least one of the -u/--update
flags.
EDIT: the -u/--update
flags allow tar
to create as well as append to an archive.
I just noticed that unfortunately, you cannot update compressed archives (tgz, created with the -c
flag). However, you can, by all means create a non-compressed archive first and then compress the results.
Also, it should not confuse you that I'm using flags to tar
with a hyphen ('-' character). It accepts both forms. In my example, -uf
would be equivalent to uf
in yours.
As for the -
option, it is probalby not documented in the man page of tar
because it is a very common Unix convention for command line tools that deal with streams as well as named files.
-
is usually a special argument for filters and names the standard input stream as a file.
You can use the -u/--update
option in conjunction with xargs
.
I just tried and to prove that it works, I gave the filename arguments to tar
one-by-one using xargs -n 1
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs -n 1 tar -uf archive.tar
Of course, this is just a proof of concept. In your case, it is probably more practical to allow xargs
to separate the argument list into larger parts that do not exceed the argument length limit, so as to avoid having a lot of calls to tar
:
find top_of_tree/ -type f | xargs tar -uf archive.tar
The prerequisite is that all implementations of tar
on your platforms support at least one of the -u/--update
flags.
EDIT: the -u/--update
flags allow tar
to create as well as append to an archive.
I just noticed that unfortunately, you cannot update compressed archives (tgz, created with the -c
flag). However, you can, by all means create a non-compressed archive first and then compress the results.
Also, it should not confuse you that I'm using flags to tar
with a hyphen ('-' character). It accepts both forms. In my example, -uf
would be equivalent to uf
in yours.
As for the -
option, it is probalby not documented in the man page of tar
because it is a very common Unix convention for command line tools that deal with streams as well as named files.
-
is usually a special argument for filters and names the standard input stream as a file.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Larry
563
563
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version oftar
does not support-u
/-update
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.
– Gilles
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version oftar
does not support-u
/-update
.
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.
– Gilles
7 hours ago
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version of
tar
does not support -u
/-update
.– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
Good idea, thank you, but unfortunately, looks like Busybox version of
tar
does not support -u
/-update
.– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
I worked a lot on embedded machines with BusyBox as well. Unfortunately, my only solution was to cross-compile 7Zip for that system.
– Larry
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.– Gilles
7 hours ago
-u
wouldn't work with a gzipped archive anyway.– Gilles
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492308%2fportable-way-to-invoke-tar-with-a-list-of-files-from-stdin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
See Usage of dash (-) in place of a filename.
– Michael Homer
8 hours ago
2
Since
tar
is not a POSIX utility, a truly portable (as in "standard") implementation may not be found.pax
, on the other hand, is a POSIX utility.– Kusalananda
8 hours ago
This site does one question per question, and that tertiary question is a massive distraction that is a question in its own right, most likely already long since covered.
– JdeBP
8 hours ago
@JdeBP - removed tertiary question
– StoneThrow
7 hours ago
@Kusalananda - that's an informative comment; thank you. However, it looks like
pax
isn't available in Busybox (at least in the version of Busybox I have to work with). I think I may have to resign myself to using the sub-optimal approach usingxargs
.– StoneThrow
7 hours ago