reverseing a queue and converting it into an int array












9














I have a queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



Collections.reverse((List)queue);
int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


This code has two problems:




  1. the explict casting (List)queue;

  2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





clearify the problem:



whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.










share|improve this question





























    9














    I have a queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



    Collections.reverse((List)queue);
    int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


    This code has two problems:




    1. the explict casting (List)queue;

    2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


    So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





    clearify the problem:



    whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.










    share|improve this question



























      9












      9








      9


      2





      I have a queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



      Collections.reverse((List)queue);
      int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


      This code has two problems:




      1. the explict casting (List)queue;

      2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


      So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





      clearify the problem:



      whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.










      share|improve this question















      I have a queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



      Collections.reverse((List)queue);
      int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


      This code has two problems:




      1. the explict casting (List)queue;

      2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


      So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





      clearify the problem:



      whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.







      java collections queue






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago

























      asked 7 hours ago









      ZhaoGang

      1,6181015




      1,6181015
























          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



          Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


          Details:



          I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



          Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
          while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
          stack.add(queue.remove());
          }
          while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
          queue.add(stack.pop());
          }


          and then convert to an array as you will



          int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




          On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



          LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
          Collections.reverse(dequeue);
          int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





          whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
          reversed elements is what I need.




          Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



          Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
          int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


          This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



          @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
          static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
          Object temp = input.toArray();
          return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
          .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
          }





          share|improve this answer























          • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
            – Marcono1234
            5 hours ago










          • If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
            – Slaw
            5 hours ago












          • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
            – nullpointer
            4 hours ago





















          2














          First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



          Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
          // ...
          int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
          ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


          You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



          public static int reverse(int arr) {
          for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
          int temp = arr[i];
          arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
          arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
          }
          return arr;
          }


          And then



          int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





          share|improve this answer





















          • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
            – nullpointer
            6 hours ago








          • 2




            @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
            – Elliott Frisch
            6 hours ago



















          2














          In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



          The skeleton of code like this:



          int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
          .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
          .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





          share|improve this answer





















          • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
            – Marcono1234
            5 hours ago










          • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
            – TongChen
            5 hours ago



















          2














          No need to get fancy here.



          static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
          int i = queue.size();
          int array = new int[i];
          for (int element : queue) {
          array[--i] = element;
          }
          return array;
          }


          Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






          share|improve this answer





























            1














            You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



            int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
            .collectInt(i -> i)
            .toList()
            .asReversed()
            .toArray();


            You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



            int ints = queue.stream()
            .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
            .asReversed()
            .toArray();


            You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



            int ints =
            IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


            Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



            int ints =
            IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


            Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






            share|improve this answer































              1














              This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



              int res = queue.stream()
              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
              .stream()
              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
              .toArray();


              If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






              share|improve this answer























              • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                – Jai
                4 hours ago



















              1














              Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



              Integer intArray = queue.stream()
              .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
              .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


              the int version should like



              int intArray = queue.stream()
              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
              .stream()
              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
              .toArray();





              share|improve this answer























              • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                – Keijack
                23 mins ago











              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54031994%2freverseing-a-queueinteger-and-converting-it-into-an-int-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              7 Answers
              7






              active

              oldest

              votes








              7 Answers
              7






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5














              The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



              Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


              Details:



              I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



              Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
              while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
              stack.add(queue.remove());
              }
              while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
              queue.add(stack.pop());
              }


              and then convert to an array as you will



              int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




              On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



              LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
              Collections.reverse(dequeue);
              int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
              reversed elements is what I need.




              Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


              This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



              @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
              static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
              Object temp = input.toArray();
              return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
              .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
              }





              share|improve this answer























              • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                – Slaw
                5 hours ago












              • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                – nullpointer
                4 hours ago


















              5














              The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



              Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


              Details:



              I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



              Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
              while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
              stack.add(queue.remove());
              }
              while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
              queue.add(stack.pop());
              }


              and then convert to an array as you will



              int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




              On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



              LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
              Collections.reverse(dequeue);
              int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
              reversed elements is what I need.




              Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


              This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



              @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
              static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
              Object temp = input.toArray();
              return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
              .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
              }





              share|improve this answer























              • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                – Slaw
                5 hours ago












              • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                – nullpointer
                4 hours ago
















              5












              5








              5






              The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



              Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


              Details:



              I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



              Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
              while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
              stack.add(queue.remove());
              }
              while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
              queue.add(stack.pop());
              }


              and then convert to an array as you will



              int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




              On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



              LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
              Collections.reverse(dequeue);
              int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
              reversed elements is what I need.




              Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


              This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



              @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
              static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
              Object temp = input.toArray();
              return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
              .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
              }





              share|improve this answer














              The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



              Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


              Details:



              I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



              Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
              while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
              stack.add(queue.remove());
              }
              while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
              queue.add(stack.pop());
              }


              and then convert to an array as you will



              int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




              On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



              LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
              Collections.reverse(dequeue);
              int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
              reversed elements is what I need.




              Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


              This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



              @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
              static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
              Object temp = input.toArray();
              return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
              .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
              }






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 4 hours ago

























              answered 6 hours ago









              nullpointer

              43.1k1093178




              43.1k1093178












              • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                – Slaw
                5 hours ago












              • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                – nullpointer
                4 hours ago




















              • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                – Slaw
                5 hours ago












              • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                – nullpointer
                4 hours ago


















              You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
              – Marcono1234
              5 hours ago




              You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
              – Marcono1234
              5 hours ago












              If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
              – Slaw
              5 hours ago






              If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
              – Slaw
              5 hours ago














              @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
              – nullpointer
              4 hours ago






              @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
              – nullpointer
              4 hours ago















              2














              First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              // ...
              int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
              ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


              You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



              public static int reverse(int arr) {
              for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
              int temp = arr[i];
              arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
              arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
              }
              return arr;
              }


              And then



              int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





              share|improve this answer





















              • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                – nullpointer
                6 hours ago








              • 2




                @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                – Elliott Frisch
                6 hours ago
















              2














              First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              // ...
              int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
              ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


              You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



              public static int reverse(int arr) {
              for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
              int temp = arr[i];
              arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
              arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
              }
              return arr;
              }


              And then



              int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





              share|improve this answer





















              • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                – nullpointer
                6 hours ago








              • 2




                @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                – Elliott Frisch
                6 hours ago














              2












              2








              2






              First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              // ...
              int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
              ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


              You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



              public static int reverse(int arr) {
              for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
              int temp = arr[i];
              arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
              arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
              }
              return arr;
              }


              And then



              int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





              share|improve this answer












              First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



              Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
              // ...
              int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
              ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


              You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



              public static int reverse(int arr) {
              for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
              int temp = arr[i];
              arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
              arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
              }
              return arr;
              }


              And then



              int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 6 hours ago









              Elliott Frisch

              153k1389178




              153k1389178












              • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                – nullpointer
                6 hours ago








              • 2




                @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                – Elliott Frisch
                6 hours ago


















              • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                – nullpointer
                6 hours ago








              • 2




                @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                – Elliott Frisch
                6 hours ago
















              but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
              – nullpointer
              6 hours ago






              but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
              – nullpointer
              6 hours ago






              2




              2




              @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
              – Elliott Frisch
              6 hours ago




              @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
              – Elliott Frisch
              6 hours ago











              2














              In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



              The skeleton of code like this:



              int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
              .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
              .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              share|improve this answer





















              • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                – TongChen
                5 hours ago
















              2














              In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



              The skeleton of code like this:



              int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
              .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
              .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              share|improve this answer





















              • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                – TongChen
                5 hours ago














              2












              2








              2






              In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



              The skeleton of code like this:



              int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
              .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
              .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





              share|improve this answer












              In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



              The skeleton of code like this:



              int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
              .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
              .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 6 hours ago









              TongChen

              1858




              1858












              • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                – TongChen
                5 hours ago


















              • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                – Marcono1234
                5 hours ago










              • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                – TongChen
                5 hours ago
















              It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
              – Marcono1234
              5 hours ago




              It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
              – Marcono1234
              5 hours ago












              @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
              – TongChen
              5 hours ago




              @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
              – TongChen
              5 hours ago











              2














              No need to get fancy here.



              static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
              int i = queue.size();
              int array = new int[i];
              for (int element : queue) {
              array[--i] = element;
              }
              return array;
              }


              Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






              share|improve this answer


























                2














                No need to get fancy here.



                static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                int i = queue.size();
                int array = new int[i];
                for (int element : queue) {
                array[--i] = element;
                }
                return array;
                }


                Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






                share|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  No need to get fancy here.



                  static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                  int i = queue.size();
                  int array = new int[i];
                  for (int element : queue) {
                  array[--i] = element;
                  }
                  return array;
                  }


                  Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






                  share|improve this answer












                  No need to get fancy here.



                  static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                  int i = queue.size();
                  int array = new int[i];
                  for (int element : queue) {
                  array[--i] = element;
                  }
                  return array;
                  }


                  Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  xehpuk

                  4,2672335




                  4,2672335























                      1














                      You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                      int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                      .collectInt(i -> i)
                      .toList()
                      .asReversed()
                      .toArray();


                      You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                      int ints = queue.stream()
                      .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                      .asReversed()
                      .toArray();


                      You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                      int ints =
                      IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                      Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                      int ints =
                      IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                      Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        1














                        You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                        int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                        .collectInt(i -> i)
                        .toList()
                        .asReversed()
                        .toArray();


                        You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                        int ints = queue.stream()
                        .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                        .asReversed()
                        .toArray();


                        You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                        int ints =
                        IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                        Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                        int ints =
                        IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                        Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          1












                          1








                          1






                          You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                          int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                          .collectInt(i -> i)
                          .toList()
                          .asReversed()
                          .toArray();


                          You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                          int ints = queue.stream()
                          .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                          .asReversed()
                          .toArray();


                          You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                          int ints =
                          IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                          Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                          int ints =
                          IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                          Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






                          share|improve this answer














                          You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                          int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                          .collectInt(i -> i)
                          .toList()
                          .asReversed()
                          .toArray();


                          You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                          int ints = queue.stream()
                          .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                          .asReversed()
                          .toArray();


                          You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                          int ints =
                          IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                          Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                          int ints =
                          IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                          Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 1 hour ago

























                          answered 4 hours ago









                          Donald Raab

                          4,21112029




                          4,21112029























                              1














                              This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                              int res = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();


                              If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






                              share|improve this answer























                              • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                – Marcono1234
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                                – Jai
                                4 hours ago
















                              1














                              This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                              int res = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();


                              If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






                              share|improve this answer























                              • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                – Marcono1234
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                                – Jai
                                4 hours ago














                              1












                              1








                              1






                              This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                              int res = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();


                              If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






                              share|improve this answer














                              This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                              int res = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();


                              If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 27 mins ago









                              ZhaoGang

                              1,6181015




                              1,6181015










                              answered 6 hours ago









                              Jai

                              5,73411231




                              5,73411231












                              • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                – Marcono1234
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                                – Jai
                                4 hours ago


















                              • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                – Marcono1234
                                5 hours ago










                              • @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                                – Jai
                                4 hours ago
















                              This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                              – Marcono1234
                              5 hours ago




                              This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                              – Marcono1234
                              5 hours ago












                              @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                              – Jai
                              4 hours ago




                              @Marcono1234 Thanks for pointing out.
                              – Jai
                              4 hours ago











                              1














                              Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                              Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                              the int version should like



                              int intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();





                              share|improve this answer























                              • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                                – Keijack
                                23 mins ago
















                              1














                              Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                              Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                              the int version should like



                              int intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();





                              share|improve this answer























                              • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                                – Keijack
                                23 mins ago














                              1












                              1








                              1






                              Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                              Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                              the int version should like



                              int intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();





                              share|improve this answer














                              Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                              Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                              the int version should like



                              int intArray = queue.stream()
                              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                              .stream()
                              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                              .toArray();






                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 24 mins ago

























                              answered 6 hours ago









                              Keijack

                              1566




                              1566












                              • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                                – Keijack
                                23 mins ago


















                              • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                                – Keijack
                                23 mins ago
















                              Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                              – Keijack
                              23 mins ago




                              Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                              – Keijack
                              23 mins ago


















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54031994%2freverseing-a-queueinteger-and-converting-it-into-an-int-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              濃尾地震

                              How to rewrite equation of hyperbola in standard form

                              No ethernet ip address in my vocore2