Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions...
When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.
And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.
Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem
) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN
and OUT
(using iopl()
I think).
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
linux
New contributor
add a comment |
When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.
And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.
Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem
) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN
and OUT
(using iopl()
I think).
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
linux
New contributor
add a comment |
When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.
And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.
Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem
) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN
and OUT
(using iopl()
I think).
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
linux
New contributor
When the CPU is in user mode, the CPU can't execute privileged instructions and can't access kernel space memory.
And when the CPU is in kernel mode, the CPU can execute all instructions and can access all memory.
Now in Linux, a user mode program can access all memory (using /dev/mem
) and can execute the two privileged instructions IN
and OUT
(using iopl()
I think).
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
linux
linux
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
ilkkachu
60.7k1098172
60.7k1098172
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
user341099user341099
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.
/dev/mem
is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO
capability. iopl()
and ioperm()
are also restricted through the same capability.
/dev/mem
can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM
).
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda
(or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.
(Then there's also the fact that iopl()
works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505527%2fdoesnt-allowing-a-user-mode-program-to-access-kernel-space-memory-and-execute-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.
/dev/mem
is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO
capability. iopl()
and ioperm()
are also restricted through the same capability.
/dev/mem
can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM
).
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda
(or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.
(Then there's also the fact that iopl()
works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)
add a comment |
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.
/dev/mem
is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO
capability. iopl()
and ioperm()
are also restricted through the same capability.
/dev/mem
can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM
).
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda
(or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.
(Then there's also the fact that iopl()
works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)
add a comment |
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.
/dev/mem
is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO
capability. iopl()
and ioperm()
are also restricted through the same capability.
/dev/mem
can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM
).
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda
(or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.
(Then there's also the fact that iopl()
works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)
So a user mode program in Linux can do most things (I think most things) that can be done in kernel mode.
Well, not all use mode programs can, only those with the appropriate privileges. And that's determined by the kernel.
/dev/mem
is protected by the usual filesystem access permissions, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO
capability. iopl()
and ioperm()
are also restricted through the same capability.
/dev/mem
can also be compiled out of the kernel altogether (CONFIG_DEVMEM
).
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to have all this power defeats the purpose of having CPU modes?
Well, maybe. It depends on what you want privileged user-space processes to be able to do. User-space processes can also trash the whole hard drive if they have access to /dev/sda
(or equivalent), even though that defeats the purpose of having a filesystem driver to handle storage access.
(Then there's also the fact that iopl()
works by utilizing the CPU privilege modes on i386, so it can't well be said to defeat their purpose.)
edited 4 hours ago
Stephen Kitt
175k24400477
175k24400477
answered 4 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
60.7k1098172
60.7k1098172
add a comment |
add a comment |
user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341099 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505527%2fdoesnt-allowing-a-user-mode-program-to-access-kernel-space-memory-and-execute-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown