Lorenz attractor path-connected?
$begingroup$
Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.
gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.
gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.
gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.
gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected
gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 29 mins ago
Douglas Sirk
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
asked 7 hours ago
Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk
312
312
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.
The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321261%2florenz-attractor-path-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.
The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.
The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.
The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
$endgroup$
The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.
The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
answered 7 hours ago
Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz
7,04642457
7,04642457
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321261%2florenz-attractor-path-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago