Linux “ip route” changes source address of TCP but not UDP












3















When sending packets from an application that binds to a local address TCP uses a different source address than UDP. For example, bind to 10.10.0.51 (alias IP), the src addr for UDP is 10.10.0.51 but the src addr for TCP is 10.10.0.2 (primary IP address of the machine). This is observed using tcpdump packet capture.



The output of "ip route show" includes this line: "10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2"



My question: why does TCP use the source address from the routing table but UDP uses the source address the application binds to?



This is on CentOS 6.



[user@host ~]$ ip route show
10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2
10.20.0.0/22 via 10.10.0.1 dev eth1
10.145.192.0/18 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.145.194.226
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1002
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1003
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth2 scope link metric 1004
default via 10.145.255.254 dev eth0



[user@host ~]$ uname -a
Linux machinename 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux



[user@host ~]$ ip address show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.145.194.226/18 brd 10.145.255.255 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c396/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:97 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.10.0.2/22 brd 10.10.3.255 scope global eth1
inet 10.10.0.51/22 scope global secondary eth1:1
inet 10.10.0.52/22 scope global secondary eth1:2
inet 10.10.0.53/22 scope global secondary eth1:3
inet 10.10.0.54/22 scope global secondary eth1:4
inet 10.10.0.55/22 scope global secondary eth1:5
inet6 2002::10:10:0:55/96 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 2002::10:10:0:54/96 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 2002::10:10:0:53/96 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 2002::10:10:0:52/96 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 2002::10:10:0:51/96 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c397/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: eth2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: ip6tnl0: <NOARP> mtu 1460 qdisc noop
link/tunnel6 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00


EDIT:
The application in question is SIPp.



sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t tn -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1

sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t un -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1


EDIT 2:



[user@host ~]$ ss -tplan | grep 5060
LISTEN 0 100 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14837,3))
SYN-SENT 0 1 10.10.0.2:50903 10.10.0.1:5060 users:(("sipp",14837,7))

[user@host ~]$ ss -uplan | grep 5060
UNCONN 0 0 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14850,3))









share|improve this question





























    3















    When sending packets from an application that binds to a local address TCP uses a different source address than UDP. For example, bind to 10.10.0.51 (alias IP), the src addr for UDP is 10.10.0.51 but the src addr for TCP is 10.10.0.2 (primary IP address of the machine). This is observed using tcpdump packet capture.



    The output of "ip route show" includes this line: "10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2"



    My question: why does TCP use the source address from the routing table but UDP uses the source address the application binds to?



    This is on CentOS 6.



    [user@host ~]$ ip route show
    10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2
    10.20.0.0/22 via 10.10.0.1 dev eth1
    10.145.192.0/18 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.145.194.226
    169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1002
    169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1003
    169.254.0.0/16 dev eth2 scope link metric 1004
    default via 10.145.255.254 dev eth0



    [user@host ~]$ uname -a
    Linux machinename 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux



    [user@host ~]$ ip address show
    1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.145.194.226/18 brd 10.145.255.255 scope global eth0
    inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c396/64 scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:97 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.10.0.2/22 brd 10.10.3.255 scope global eth1
    inet 10.10.0.51/22 scope global secondary eth1:1
    inet 10.10.0.52/22 scope global secondary eth1:2
    inet 10.10.0.53/22 scope global secondary eth1:3
    inet 10.10.0.54/22 scope global secondary eth1:4
    inet 10.10.0.55/22 scope global secondary eth1:5
    inet6 2002::10:10:0:55/96 scope global
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 2002::10:10:0:54/96 scope global
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 2002::10:10:0:53/96 scope global
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 2002::10:10:0:52/96 scope global
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 2002::10:10:0:51/96 scope global
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c397/64 scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    4: eth2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    5: ip6tnl0: <NOARP> mtu 1460 qdisc noop
    link/tunnel6 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00


    EDIT:
    The application in question is SIPp.



    sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t tn -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1

    sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t un -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1


    EDIT 2:



    [user@host ~]$ ss -tplan | grep 5060
    LISTEN 0 100 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14837,3))
    SYN-SENT 0 1 10.10.0.2:50903 10.10.0.1:5060 users:(("sipp",14837,7))

    [user@host ~]$ ss -uplan | grep 5060
    UNCONN 0 0 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14850,3))









    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3


      1






      When sending packets from an application that binds to a local address TCP uses a different source address than UDP. For example, bind to 10.10.0.51 (alias IP), the src addr for UDP is 10.10.0.51 but the src addr for TCP is 10.10.0.2 (primary IP address of the machine). This is observed using tcpdump packet capture.



      The output of "ip route show" includes this line: "10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2"



      My question: why does TCP use the source address from the routing table but UDP uses the source address the application binds to?



      This is on CentOS 6.



      [user@host ~]$ ip route show
      10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2
      10.20.0.0/22 via 10.10.0.1 dev eth1
      10.145.192.0/18 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.145.194.226
      169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1002
      169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1003
      169.254.0.0/16 dev eth2 scope link metric 1004
      default via 10.145.255.254 dev eth0



      [user@host ~]$ uname -a
      Linux machinename 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux



      [user@host ~]$ ip address show
      1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 10.145.194.226/18 brd 10.145.255.255 scope global eth0
      inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c396/64 scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:97 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 10.10.0.2/22 brd 10.10.3.255 scope global eth1
      inet 10.10.0.51/22 scope global secondary eth1:1
      inet 10.10.0.52/22 scope global secondary eth1:2
      inet 10.10.0.53/22 scope global secondary eth1:3
      inet 10.10.0.54/22 scope global secondary eth1:4
      inet 10.10.0.55/22 scope global secondary eth1:5
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:55/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:54/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:53/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:52/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:51/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c397/64 scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      4: eth2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      5: ip6tnl0: <NOARP> mtu 1460 qdisc noop
      link/tunnel6 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00


      EDIT:
      The application in question is SIPp.



      sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t tn -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1

      sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t un -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1


      EDIT 2:



      [user@host ~]$ ss -tplan | grep 5060
      LISTEN 0 100 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14837,3))
      SYN-SENT 0 1 10.10.0.2:50903 10.10.0.1:5060 users:(("sipp",14837,7))

      [user@host ~]$ ss -uplan | grep 5060
      UNCONN 0 0 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14850,3))









      share|improve this question
















      When sending packets from an application that binds to a local address TCP uses a different source address than UDP. For example, bind to 10.10.0.51 (alias IP), the src addr for UDP is 10.10.0.51 but the src addr for TCP is 10.10.0.2 (primary IP address of the machine). This is observed using tcpdump packet capture.



      The output of "ip route show" includes this line: "10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2"



      My question: why does TCP use the source address from the routing table but UDP uses the source address the application binds to?



      This is on CentOS 6.



      [user@host ~]$ ip route show
      10.10.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.2
      10.20.0.0/22 via 10.10.0.1 dev eth1
      10.145.192.0/18 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.145.194.226
      169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1002
      169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1003
      169.254.0.0/16 dev eth2 scope link metric 1004
      default via 10.145.255.254 dev eth0



      [user@host ~]$ uname -a
      Linux machinename 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux



      [user@host ~]$ ip address show
      1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 10.145.194.226/18 brd 10.145.255.255 scope global eth0
      inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c396/64 scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:97 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 10.10.0.2/22 brd 10.10.3.255 scope global eth1
      inet 10.10.0.51/22 scope global secondary eth1:1
      inet 10.10.0.52/22 scope global secondary eth1:2
      inet 10.10.0.53/22 scope global secondary eth1:3
      inet 10.10.0.54/22 scope global secondary eth1:4
      inet 10.10.0.55/22 scope global secondary eth1:5
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:55/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:54/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:53/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:52/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 2002::10:10:0:51/96 scope global
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe01:c397/64 scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      4: eth2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:50:56:01:c3:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      5: ip6tnl0: <NOARP> mtu 1460 qdisc noop
      link/tunnel6 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00


      EDIT:
      The application in question is SIPp.



      sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t tn -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1

      sipp -sn uac -i 10.10.0.51 -t un -p 5060 -m 1 -r 1 10.10.0.1


      EDIT 2:



      [user@host ~]$ ss -tplan | grep 5060
      LISTEN 0 100 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14837,3))
      SYN-SENT 0 1 10.10.0.2:50903 10.10.0.1:5060 users:(("sipp",14837,7))

      [user@host ~]$ ss -uplan | grep 5060
      UNCONN 0 0 10.10.0.51:5060 *:* users:(("sipp",14850,3))






      tcp route udp






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 mins ago









      Rui F Ribeiro

      41.8k1483142




      41.8k1483142










      asked Jun 16 '14 at 19:54









      aikcharaikchar

      365




      365






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          I was able to confirm (to an extent) that the issue is with SIPp and not in Linux in general.



          I have created a ticket with SIPp: https://sourceforge.net/p/sipp/bugs/147/



          My troubleshooting was as follows:



          On "server" side open netcat:



          nc -v -l 10.10.0.55 5060


          On "client side open netcat:



          nc -v -s 10.10.0.5 10.10.0.55 5060


          Output on "server" side:



          Connection from 10.10.0.5 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


          Output on "client" side:



          Connection to 10.10.0.55 5060 port [tcp/sip] succeeded!


          When I don't specify a specific IP on the "client" side:



          nc -v 10.10.0.55 5060


          Then the output on the "server" side is:



          Connection from 10.10.0.4 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


          This means that specifying a specific IP address works and it's SIPp that doesn't work that way when using the -i flag.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137464%2flinux-ip-route-changes-source-address-of-tcp-but-not-udp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            I was able to confirm (to an extent) that the issue is with SIPp and not in Linux in general.



            I have created a ticket with SIPp: https://sourceforge.net/p/sipp/bugs/147/



            My troubleshooting was as follows:



            On "server" side open netcat:



            nc -v -l 10.10.0.55 5060


            On "client side open netcat:



            nc -v -s 10.10.0.5 10.10.0.55 5060


            Output on "server" side:



            Connection from 10.10.0.5 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


            Output on "client" side:



            Connection to 10.10.0.55 5060 port [tcp/sip] succeeded!


            When I don't specify a specific IP on the "client" side:



            nc -v 10.10.0.55 5060


            Then the output on the "server" side is:



            Connection from 10.10.0.4 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


            This means that specifying a specific IP address works and it's SIPp that doesn't work that way when using the -i flag.






            share|improve this answer






























              2














              I was able to confirm (to an extent) that the issue is with SIPp and not in Linux in general.



              I have created a ticket with SIPp: https://sourceforge.net/p/sipp/bugs/147/



              My troubleshooting was as follows:



              On "server" side open netcat:



              nc -v -l 10.10.0.55 5060


              On "client side open netcat:



              nc -v -s 10.10.0.5 10.10.0.55 5060


              Output on "server" side:



              Connection from 10.10.0.5 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


              Output on "client" side:



              Connection to 10.10.0.55 5060 port [tcp/sip] succeeded!


              When I don't specify a specific IP on the "client" side:



              nc -v 10.10.0.55 5060


              Then the output on the "server" side is:



              Connection from 10.10.0.4 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


              This means that specifying a specific IP address works and it's SIPp that doesn't work that way when using the -i flag.






              share|improve this answer




























                2












                2








                2







                I was able to confirm (to an extent) that the issue is with SIPp and not in Linux in general.



                I have created a ticket with SIPp: https://sourceforge.net/p/sipp/bugs/147/



                My troubleshooting was as follows:



                On "server" side open netcat:



                nc -v -l 10.10.0.55 5060


                On "client side open netcat:



                nc -v -s 10.10.0.5 10.10.0.55 5060


                Output on "server" side:



                Connection from 10.10.0.5 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


                Output on "client" side:



                Connection to 10.10.0.55 5060 port [tcp/sip] succeeded!


                When I don't specify a specific IP on the "client" side:



                nc -v 10.10.0.55 5060


                Then the output on the "server" side is:



                Connection from 10.10.0.4 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


                This means that specifying a specific IP address works and it's SIPp that doesn't work that way when using the -i flag.






                share|improve this answer















                I was able to confirm (to an extent) that the issue is with SIPp and not in Linux in general.



                I have created a ticket with SIPp: https://sourceforge.net/p/sipp/bugs/147/



                My troubleshooting was as follows:



                On "server" side open netcat:



                nc -v -l 10.10.0.55 5060


                On "client side open netcat:



                nc -v -s 10.10.0.5 10.10.0.55 5060


                Output on "server" side:



                Connection from 10.10.0.5 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


                Output on "client" side:



                Connection to 10.10.0.55 5060 port [tcp/sip] succeeded!


                When I don't specify a specific IP on the "client" side:



                nc -v 10.10.0.55 5060


                Then the output on the "server" side is:



                Connection from 10.10.0.4 port 5060 [tcp/*] accepted


                This means that specifying a specific IP address works and it's SIPp that doesn't work that way when using the -i flag.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jun 16 '14 at 22:45

























                answered Jun 16 '14 at 22:28









                aikcharaikchar

                365




                365






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137464%2flinux-ip-route-changes-source-address-of-tcp-but-not-udp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    宮崎県

                    濃尾地震

                    シテ島