Should the “discard” option be used for mounting a swap file?












4















The Arch Wiki says that defaults,discard can be used in the fstab file for a swap partition. However it is not clear about a swap file, nor is the man page.



If the swap file resides in a filesystem which itself is mounted with the discard option (and is obviously in an SSD), should it use discard itself? And what if the parent filesystem is not discard'ing?



Intuition says "no", but I could not find anything about it and thought it was worth discussing.










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • I am wondering the same thing. Did you find an answer to your question?

    – Pierre Spring
    May 9 '18 at 12:48






  • 1





    @PierreSpring I didn't; but I settled with periodic discards instead by enabling fstrim.timer with systemd. The timer simply calls fstrim -av once a week. You can read more at wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drive#TRIM.

    – Marc.2377
    May 10 '18 at 0:10


















4















The Arch Wiki says that defaults,discard can be used in the fstab file for a swap partition. However it is not clear about a swap file, nor is the man page.



If the swap file resides in a filesystem which itself is mounted with the discard option (and is obviously in an SSD), should it use discard itself? And what if the parent filesystem is not discard'ing?



Intuition says "no", but I could not find anything about it and thought it was worth discussing.










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • I am wondering the same thing. Did you find an answer to your question?

    – Pierre Spring
    May 9 '18 at 12:48






  • 1





    @PierreSpring I didn't; but I settled with periodic discards instead by enabling fstrim.timer with systemd. The timer simply calls fstrim -av once a week. You can read more at wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drive#TRIM.

    – Marc.2377
    May 10 '18 at 0:10
















4












4








4


1






The Arch Wiki says that defaults,discard can be used in the fstab file for a swap partition. However it is not clear about a swap file, nor is the man page.



If the swap file resides in a filesystem which itself is mounted with the discard option (and is obviously in an SSD), should it use discard itself? And what if the parent filesystem is not discard'ing?



Intuition says "no", but I could not find anything about it and thought it was worth discussing.










share|improve this question














The Arch Wiki says that defaults,discard can be used in the fstab file for a swap partition. However it is not clear about a swap file, nor is the man page.



If the swap file resides in a filesystem which itself is mounted with the discard option (and is obviously in an SSD), should it use discard itself? And what if the parent filesystem is not discard'ing?



Intuition says "no", but I could not find anything about it and thought it was worth discussing.







filesystems mount swap trim






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 1 '17 at 1:45









Marc.2377Marc.2377

298324




298324





bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • I am wondering the same thing. Did you find an answer to your question?

    – Pierre Spring
    May 9 '18 at 12:48






  • 1





    @PierreSpring I didn't; but I settled with periodic discards instead by enabling fstrim.timer with systemd. The timer simply calls fstrim -av once a week. You can read more at wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drive#TRIM.

    – Marc.2377
    May 10 '18 at 0:10





















  • I am wondering the same thing. Did you find an answer to your question?

    – Pierre Spring
    May 9 '18 at 12:48






  • 1





    @PierreSpring I didn't; but I settled with periodic discards instead by enabling fstrim.timer with systemd. The timer simply calls fstrim -av once a week. You can read more at wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drive#TRIM.

    – Marc.2377
    May 10 '18 at 0:10



















I am wondering the same thing. Did you find an answer to your question?

– Pierre Spring
May 9 '18 at 12:48





I am wondering the same thing. Did you find an answer to your question?

– Pierre Spring
May 9 '18 at 12:48




1




1





@PierreSpring I didn't; but I settled with periodic discards instead by enabling fstrim.timer with systemd. The timer simply calls fstrim -av once a week. You can read more at wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drive#TRIM.

– Marc.2377
May 10 '18 at 0:10







@PierreSpring I didn't; but I settled with periodic discards instead by enabling fstrim.timer with systemd. The timer simply calls fstrim -av once a week. You can read more at wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drive#TRIM.

– Marc.2377
May 10 '18 at 0:10












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I would say no.



1: The swap space does not use the same concept of free space as filesystem



2: what matter is that you always keep at least 25% free space on your SSD (this value was given to me by Sandisk representative on the phone), to allow proper work of wear levelling.



=> as long as the disk has spare clusters to work with, and to perform WL, it does not really matter if 5% of your disk is never trimmed, or continusouly re-written: even when YOU rewrite the same logical or physical sectors, WL will use different clusters anyway, when you write large enough blocks.



The question remains unanswered if you are using a whole disk for swapping. A whole disk used for swap may suffer premature aging, if never trimmed.



The other question is: does the swap driver support discard ? ext3/ext4 do.



Maybe, if your swap occupies a significant % of the disk, if you can, you could discard/trim the swap space during shutdown: if you can, after killing all services, do swapoff, and find a way to discard the swapspace (since I am not an expert, and to not leave the question unanswered, I would propose to mkfs.ext3, fstrim, mkswap again - there are probably other better solutions. Check if shutdown is due to UPS. ).






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f368456%2fshould-the-discard-option-be-used-for-mounting-a-swap-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I would say no.



    1: The swap space does not use the same concept of free space as filesystem



    2: what matter is that you always keep at least 25% free space on your SSD (this value was given to me by Sandisk representative on the phone), to allow proper work of wear levelling.



    => as long as the disk has spare clusters to work with, and to perform WL, it does not really matter if 5% of your disk is never trimmed, or continusouly re-written: even when YOU rewrite the same logical or physical sectors, WL will use different clusters anyway, when you write large enough blocks.



    The question remains unanswered if you are using a whole disk for swapping. A whole disk used for swap may suffer premature aging, if never trimmed.



    The other question is: does the swap driver support discard ? ext3/ext4 do.



    Maybe, if your swap occupies a significant % of the disk, if you can, you could discard/trim the swap space during shutdown: if you can, after killing all services, do swapoff, and find a way to discard the swapspace (since I am not an expert, and to not leave the question unanswered, I would propose to mkfs.ext3, fstrim, mkswap again - there are probably other better solutions. Check if shutdown is due to UPS. ).






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      I would say no.



      1: The swap space does not use the same concept of free space as filesystem



      2: what matter is that you always keep at least 25% free space on your SSD (this value was given to me by Sandisk representative on the phone), to allow proper work of wear levelling.



      => as long as the disk has spare clusters to work with, and to perform WL, it does not really matter if 5% of your disk is never trimmed, or continusouly re-written: even when YOU rewrite the same logical or physical sectors, WL will use different clusters anyway, when you write large enough blocks.



      The question remains unanswered if you are using a whole disk for swapping. A whole disk used for swap may suffer premature aging, if never trimmed.



      The other question is: does the swap driver support discard ? ext3/ext4 do.



      Maybe, if your swap occupies a significant % of the disk, if you can, you could discard/trim the swap space during shutdown: if you can, after killing all services, do swapoff, and find a way to discard the swapspace (since I am not an expert, and to not leave the question unanswered, I would propose to mkfs.ext3, fstrim, mkswap again - there are probably other better solutions. Check if shutdown is due to UPS. ).






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        I would say no.



        1: The swap space does not use the same concept of free space as filesystem



        2: what matter is that you always keep at least 25% free space on your SSD (this value was given to me by Sandisk representative on the phone), to allow proper work of wear levelling.



        => as long as the disk has spare clusters to work with, and to perform WL, it does not really matter if 5% of your disk is never trimmed, or continusouly re-written: even when YOU rewrite the same logical or physical sectors, WL will use different clusters anyway, when you write large enough blocks.



        The question remains unanswered if you are using a whole disk for swapping. A whole disk used for swap may suffer premature aging, if never trimmed.



        The other question is: does the swap driver support discard ? ext3/ext4 do.



        Maybe, if your swap occupies a significant % of the disk, if you can, you could discard/trim the swap space during shutdown: if you can, after killing all services, do swapoff, and find a way to discard the swapspace (since I am not an expert, and to not leave the question unanswered, I would propose to mkfs.ext3, fstrim, mkswap again - there are probably other better solutions. Check if shutdown is due to UPS. ).






        share|improve this answer













        I would say no.



        1: The swap space does not use the same concept of free space as filesystem



        2: what matter is that you always keep at least 25% free space on your SSD (this value was given to me by Sandisk representative on the phone), to allow proper work of wear levelling.



        => as long as the disk has spare clusters to work with, and to perform WL, it does not really matter if 5% of your disk is never trimmed, or continusouly re-written: even when YOU rewrite the same logical or physical sectors, WL will use different clusters anyway, when you write large enough blocks.



        The question remains unanswered if you are using a whole disk for swapping. A whole disk used for swap may suffer premature aging, if never trimmed.



        The other question is: does the swap driver support discard ? ext3/ext4 do.



        Maybe, if your swap occupies a significant % of the disk, if you can, you could discard/trim the swap space during shutdown: if you can, after killing all services, do swapoff, and find a way to discard the swapspace (since I am not an expert, and to not leave the question unanswered, I would propose to mkfs.ext3, fstrim, mkswap again - there are probably other better solutions. Check if shutdown is due to UPS. ).







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 3 '18 at 14:42









        Benoit-Pierre DEMAINEBenoit-Pierre DEMAINE

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f368456%2fshould-the-discard-option-be-used-for-mounting-a-swap-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            CARDNET

            Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

            濃尾地震