What is the purpose of `.Trash-1000` in my external hard drive and how can I clean it up?

-1

I have a Western Digital external hard drive with one partition and a NTFS filesystem. In Lubuntu, under its top directory:

$ sudo du -d 0 -h * | sort -h

0   temp

7.5K    $RECYCLE.BIN

25K System Volume Information

690M    dir1

1.5G    dir2

3.2G    dir3

15G     dir4

71G     dir5

98G     dir6

522G    dir7

roughly the drive has 0.7+1.5+3.2+15+71+98+522 = 711.4 G in use.

But

$ sudo df -h

Filesystem           Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on

/dev/sdb1            932G  880G   53G  95% /media/t/My Passport

and gparted shows the hard drive has 931.48GiB in Size, 879.47GiB Used, and 52.01GiB Unused.

So why do the three ways give different results? Why does the first way give very different result from the the other two in particular?

Thanks.

I just found a hidden directory .Trash-1000 under the top directory.

$ du -h -d 0 .Trash-1000 

166G    .Trash-1000



$ ls .Trash-1000/

expunged  files  info

What is the purpose of .Trash-1000?

How shall I clean it up? Can I simply rm -r .Trash-1000?

edited 5 mins ago

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

So you already see it's different...

– 炸鱼薯条德里克
5 mins ago

add a comment |

-1

I have a Western Digital external hard drive with one partition and a NTFS filesystem. In Lubuntu, under its top directory:

$ sudo du -d 0 -h * | sort -h

0   temp

7.5K    $RECYCLE.BIN

25K System Volume Information

690M    dir1

1.5G    dir2

3.2G    dir3

15G     dir4

71G     dir5

98G     dir6

522G    dir7

roughly the drive has 0.7+1.5+3.2+15+71+98+522 = 711.4 G in use.

But

$ sudo df -h

Filesystem           Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on

/dev/sdb1            932G  880G   53G  95% /media/t/My Passport

and gparted shows the hard drive has 931.48GiB in Size, 879.47GiB Used, and 52.01GiB Unused.

So why do the three ways give different results? Why does the first way give very different result from the the other two in particular?

Thanks.

I just found a hidden directory .Trash-1000 under the top directory.

$ du -h -d 0 .Trash-1000 

166G    .Trash-1000



$ ls .Trash-1000/

expunged  files  info

What is the purpose of .Trash-1000?

How shall I clean it up? Can I simply rm -r .Trash-1000?

edited 5 mins ago

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

So you already see it's different...

– 炸鱼薯条德里克
5 mins ago

add a comment |

-1

I have a Western Digital external hard drive with one partition and a NTFS filesystem. In Lubuntu, under its top directory:

$ sudo du -d 0 -h * | sort -h

0   temp

7.5K    $RECYCLE.BIN

25K System Volume Information

690M    dir1

1.5G    dir2

3.2G    dir3

15G     dir4

71G     dir5

98G     dir6

522G    dir7

roughly the drive has 0.7+1.5+3.2+15+71+98+522 = 711.4 G in use.

But

$ sudo df -h

Filesystem           Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on

/dev/sdb1            932G  880G   53G  95% /media/t/My Passport

and gparted shows the hard drive has 931.48GiB in Size, 879.47GiB Used, and 52.01GiB Unused.

So why do the three ways give different results? Why does the first way give very different result from the the other two in particular?

Thanks.

I just found a hidden directory .Trash-1000 under the top directory.

$ du -h -d 0 .Trash-1000 

166G    .Trash-1000



$ ls .Trash-1000/

expunged  files  info

What is the purpose of .Trash-1000?

How shall I clean it up? Can I simply rm -r .Trash-1000?

edited 5 mins ago

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

I have a Western Digital external hard drive with one partition and a NTFS filesystem. In Lubuntu, under its top directory:

$ sudo du -d 0 -h * | sort -h

0   temp

7.5K    $RECYCLE.BIN

25K System Volume Information

690M    dir1

1.5G    dir2

3.2G    dir3

15G     dir4

71G     dir5

98G     dir6

522G    dir7

roughly the drive has 0.7+1.5+3.2+15+71+98+522 = 711.4 G in use.

But

$ sudo df -h

Filesystem           Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on

/dev/sdb1            932G  880G   53G  95% /media/t/My Passport

and gparted shows the hard drive has 931.48GiB in Size, 879.47GiB Used, and 52.01GiB Unused.

So why do the three ways give different results? Why does the first way give very different result from the the other two in particular?

Thanks.

I just found a hidden directory .Trash-1000 under the top directory.

$ du -h -d 0 .Trash-1000 

166G    .Trash-1000



$ ls .Trash-1000/

expunged  files  info

What is the purpose of .Trash-1000?

How shall I clean it up? Can I simply rm -r .Trash-1000?

hard-disk disk-usage

edited 5 mins ago

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

edited 5 mins ago

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

edited 5 mins ago

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

asked 54 mins ago

Tim

27.3k78264473

So you already see it's different...

– 炸鱼薯条德里克
5 mins ago

add a comment |

So you already see it's different...

– 炸鱼薯条德里克
5 mins ago

So you already see it's different...

– 炸鱼薯条德里克
5 mins ago

add a comment |

0

active

oldest

votes

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503043%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-trash-1000-in-my-external-hard-drive-and-how-can-i-cle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

0

active

oldest

votes

0

active

oldest

votes

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Yrurtj