What happened to the colonial estates belonging to loyalists after the American Revolution?
What happened to the colonial estates of the rich, elite Loyalist families after the American Revolution? I assume they were just broken up and sold off to small farmers to appease some of the land hunger at the time.
united-states american-revolution
New contributor
add a comment |
What happened to the colonial estates of the rich, elite Loyalist families after the American Revolution? I assume they were just broken up and sold off to small farmers to appease some of the land hunger at the time.
united-states american-revolution
New contributor
3
Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask.
– sempaiscuba♦
11 hours ago
1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
– Denis de Bernardy
11 hours ago
An important question that was mentioned explicitly in the peace treaty, formed part of the basis for the War of 1812 and affected Anglo-American relations until perhaps the civil war. Having said that, please explain why the Wiki page isn't adequate and let us know what research you've done so far.
– Mark C. Wallace♦
7 hours ago
add a comment |
What happened to the colonial estates of the rich, elite Loyalist families after the American Revolution? I assume they were just broken up and sold off to small farmers to appease some of the land hunger at the time.
united-states american-revolution
New contributor
What happened to the colonial estates of the rich, elite Loyalist families after the American Revolution? I assume they were just broken up and sold off to small farmers to appease some of the land hunger at the time.
united-states american-revolution
united-states american-revolution
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
51.6k6177223
51.6k6177223
New contributor
asked 11 hours ago
Peter SpencerPeter Spencer
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
3
Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask.
– sempaiscuba♦
11 hours ago
1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
– Denis de Bernardy
11 hours ago
An important question that was mentioned explicitly in the peace treaty, formed part of the basis for the War of 1812 and affected Anglo-American relations until perhaps the civil war. Having said that, please explain why the Wiki page isn't adequate and let us know what research you've done so far.
– Mark C. Wallace♦
7 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask.
– sempaiscuba♦
11 hours ago
1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
– Denis de Bernardy
11 hours ago
An important question that was mentioned explicitly in the peace treaty, formed part of the basis for the War of 1812 and affected Anglo-American relations until perhaps the civil war. Having said that, please explain why the Wiki page isn't adequate and let us know what research you've done so far.
– Mark C. Wallace♦
7 hours ago
3
3
Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask.
– sempaiscuba♦
11 hours ago
Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask.
– sempaiscuba♦
11 hours ago
1
1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
– Denis de Bernardy
11 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
– Denis de Bernardy
11 hours ago
An important question that was mentioned explicitly in the peace treaty, formed part of the basis for the War of 1812 and affected Anglo-American relations until perhaps the civil war. Having said that, please explain why the Wiki page isn't adequate and let us know what research you've done so far.
– Mark C. Wallace♦
7 hours ago
An important question that was mentioned explicitly in the peace treaty, formed part of the basis for the War of 1812 and affected Anglo-American relations until perhaps the civil war. Having said that, please explain why the Wiki page isn't adequate and let us know what research you've done so far.
– Mark C. Wallace♦
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In many (perhaps most) cases, the estates were seized by the states which passed various forms of Confiscation Act.
The page Dispossessing Loyalists and Redistributing Property in Revolutionary New York on the website of the New York Public Library states:
"... many states passed laws allowing them to seize the property of known loyalists. So-called “confiscation laws” effectively criminalized dissent against the American Revolution. The seizure and sale of loyalist property also raised revenue for the state by redistributing property from Loyalists to the rest of the community. "
going on to note that:
"New York built one of the most robust property confiscation regimes."
To give another example, Confiscation acts in North Carolina would raise about £600,000 as the confiscated estates were resold (mostly in 1786 and 1787).
The article Confiscation of Loyalist Property in Georgia, 1782-1786, by Robert S. Lambert in The William and Mary Quarterly (Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1963), pp 80-94) records widespread confiscations of property between 1782 and 1787, netting the state some £410,000.
If you are interested in pursuing the topic in more detail, the subject of The Legislation for the Confiscation of British and Loyalist Property During the Revolutionary War was the subject of a 1937 PhD thesis by Rolfe Lyman Allen at the University of Maryland.
The issue of compensation for confiscated lands, and the prevention of future confiscations, was explicitly addressed in the 1783 Treaty of Paris where the fifth article stated:
"ARTICLE 5: It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects ... And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price"
While the sixth article required:
"ARTICLE 6: That there shall be no future Confiscations made, nor any prosecutions commenced against any Person or Persons, for or by reason of the Part which he or they may have taken in the present War ..."
(the full text of the Paris Peace Treaty can be found on the website of the Yale Law School)
Unfortunately for those whose estates had been confiscated, by and large, the states simply ignored these provisions.
On an interesting side-note, a court case on the issue of confiscations (Bayard v. Singleton) would establish the principle of judicial review in North Carolina, and eventually in the wider American legal system.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Peter Spencer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51480%2fwhat-happened-to-the-colonial-estates-belonging-to-loyalists-after-the-american%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In many (perhaps most) cases, the estates were seized by the states which passed various forms of Confiscation Act.
The page Dispossessing Loyalists and Redistributing Property in Revolutionary New York on the website of the New York Public Library states:
"... many states passed laws allowing them to seize the property of known loyalists. So-called “confiscation laws” effectively criminalized dissent against the American Revolution. The seizure and sale of loyalist property also raised revenue for the state by redistributing property from Loyalists to the rest of the community. "
going on to note that:
"New York built one of the most robust property confiscation regimes."
To give another example, Confiscation acts in North Carolina would raise about £600,000 as the confiscated estates were resold (mostly in 1786 and 1787).
The article Confiscation of Loyalist Property in Georgia, 1782-1786, by Robert S. Lambert in The William and Mary Quarterly (Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1963), pp 80-94) records widespread confiscations of property between 1782 and 1787, netting the state some £410,000.
If you are interested in pursuing the topic in more detail, the subject of The Legislation for the Confiscation of British and Loyalist Property During the Revolutionary War was the subject of a 1937 PhD thesis by Rolfe Lyman Allen at the University of Maryland.
The issue of compensation for confiscated lands, and the prevention of future confiscations, was explicitly addressed in the 1783 Treaty of Paris where the fifth article stated:
"ARTICLE 5: It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects ... And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price"
While the sixth article required:
"ARTICLE 6: That there shall be no future Confiscations made, nor any prosecutions commenced against any Person or Persons, for or by reason of the Part which he or they may have taken in the present War ..."
(the full text of the Paris Peace Treaty can be found on the website of the Yale Law School)
Unfortunately for those whose estates had been confiscated, by and large, the states simply ignored these provisions.
On an interesting side-note, a court case on the issue of confiscations (Bayard v. Singleton) would establish the principle of judicial review in North Carolina, and eventually in the wider American legal system.
add a comment |
In many (perhaps most) cases, the estates were seized by the states which passed various forms of Confiscation Act.
The page Dispossessing Loyalists and Redistributing Property in Revolutionary New York on the website of the New York Public Library states:
"... many states passed laws allowing them to seize the property of known loyalists. So-called “confiscation laws” effectively criminalized dissent against the American Revolution. The seizure and sale of loyalist property also raised revenue for the state by redistributing property from Loyalists to the rest of the community. "
going on to note that:
"New York built one of the most robust property confiscation regimes."
To give another example, Confiscation acts in North Carolina would raise about £600,000 as the confiscated estates were resold (mostly in 1786 and 1787).
The article Confiscation of Loyalist Property in Georgia, 1782-1786, by Robert S. Lambert in The William and Mary Quarterly (Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1963), pp 80-94) records widespread confiscations of property between 1782 and 1787, netting the state some £410,000.
If you are interested in pursuing the topic in more detail, the subject of The Legislation for the Confiscation of British and Loyalist Property During the Revolutionary War was the subject of a 1937 PhD thesis by Rolfe Lyman Allen at the University of Maryland.
The issue of compensation for confiscated lands, and the prevention of future confiscations, was explicitly addressed in the 1783 Treaty of Paris where the fifth article stated:
"ARTICLE 5: It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects ... And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price"
While the sixth article required:
"ARTICLE 6: That there shall be no future Confiscations made, nor any prosecutions commenced against any Person or Persons, for or by reason of the Part which he or they may have taken in the present War ..."
(the full text of the Paris Peace Treaty can be found on the website of the Yale Law School)
Unfortunately for those whose estates had been confiscated, by and large, the states simply ignored these provisions.
On an interesting side-note, a court case on the issue of confiscations (Bayard v. Singleton) would establish the principle of judicial review in North Carolina, and eventually in the wider American legal system.
add a comment |
In many (perhaps most) cases, the estates were seized by the states which passed various forms of Confiscation Act.
The page Dispossessing Loyalists and Redistributing Property in Revolutionary New York on the website of the New York Public Library states:
"... many states passed laws allowing them to seize the property of known loyalists. So-called “confiscation laws” effectively criminalized dissent against the American Revolution. The seizure and sale of loyalist property also raised revenue for the state by redistributing property from Loyalists to the rest of the community. "
going on to note that:
"New York built one of the most robust property confiscation regimes."
To give another example, Confiscation acts in North Carolina would raise about £600,000 as the confiscated estates were resold (mostly in 1786 and 1787).
The article Confiscation of Loyalist Property in Georgia, 1782-1786, by Robert S. Lambert in The William and Mary Quarterly (Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1963), pp 80-94) records widespread confiscations of property between 1782 and 1787, netting the state some £410,000.
If you are interested in pursuing the topic in more detail, the subject of The Legislation for the Confiscation of British and Loyalist Property During the Revolutionary War was the subject of a 1937 PhD thesis by Rolfe Lyman Allen at the University of Maryland.
The issue of compensation for confiscated lands, and the prevention of future confiscations, was explicitly addressed in the 1783 Treaty of Paris where the fifth article stated:
"ARTICLE 5: It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects ... And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price"
While the sixth article required:
"ARTICLE 6: That there shall be no future Confiscations made, nor any prosecutions commenced against any Person or Persons, for or by reason of the Part which he or they may have taken in the present War ..."
(the full text of the Paris Peace Treaty can be found on the website of the Yale Law School)
Unfortunately for those whose estates had been confiscated, by and large, the states simply ignored these provisions.
On an interesting side-note, a court case on the issue of confiscations (Bayard v. Singleton) would establish the principle of judicial review in North Carolina, and eventually in the wider American legal system.
In many (perhaps most) cases, the estates were seized by the states which passed various forms of Confiscation Act.
The page Dispossessing Loyalists and Redistributing Property in Revolutionary New York on the website of the New York Public Library states:
"... many states passed laws allowing them to seize the property of known loyalists. So-called “confiscation laws” effectively criminalized dissent against the American Revolution. The seizure and sale of loyalist property also raised revenue for the state by redistributing property from Loyalists to the rest of the community. "
going on to note that:
"New York built one of the most robust property confiscation regimes."
To give another example, Confiscation acts in North Carolina would raise about £600,000 as the confiscated estates were resold (mostly in 1786 and 1787).
The article Confiscation of Loyalist Property in Georgia, 1782-1786, by Robert S. Lambert in The William and Mary Quarterly (Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1963), pp 80-94) records widespread confiscations of property between 1782 and 1787, netting the state some £410,000.
If you are interested in pursuing the topic in more detail, the subject of The Legislation for the Confiscation of British and Loyalist Property During the Revolutionary War was the subject of a 1937 PhD thesis by Rolfe Lyman Allen at the University of Maryland.
The issue of compensation for confiscated lands, and the prevention of future confiscations, was explicitly addressed in the 1783 Treaty of Paris where the fifth article stated:
"ARTICLE 5: It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects ... And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price"
While the sixth article required:
"ARTICLE 6: That there shall be no future Confiscations made, nor any prosecutions commenced against any Person or Persons, for or by reason of the Part which he or they may have taken in the present War ..."
(the full text of the Paris Peace Treaty can be found on the website of the Yale Law School)
Unfortunately for those whose estates had been confiscated, by and large, the states simply ignored these provisions.
On an interesting side-note, a court case on the issue of confiscations (Bayard v. Singleton) would establish the principle of judicial review in North Carolina, and eventually in the wider American legal system.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
51.6k6177223
51.6k6177223
add a comment |
add a comment |
Peter Spencer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Spencer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Spencer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Spencer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51480%2fwhat-happened-to-the-colonial-estates-belonging-to-loyalists-after-the-american%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask.
– sempaiscuba♦
11 hours ago
1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
– Denis de Bernardy
11 hours ago
An important question that was mentioned explicitly in the peace treaty, formed part of the basis for the War of 1812 and affected Anglo-American relations until perhaps the civil war. Having said that, please explain why the Wiki page isn't adequate and let us know what research you've done so far.
– Mark C. Wallace♦
7 hours ago