How to make edcite skip straight to the short form when biblatex-chicago short option is selected












2















Some time ago, David Purton (@DavidPurton) kindly devised a set of commands --- edcite{}, edvolcite{}{}, transcite{}, etc. --- for referencing just the editor or translator and publication information of an edition of an ancient or medieval primary text.



My question today involves the same MWE as before: is there a simple way to get edcite{} and its siblings to conform to the short option in the command usepackage[notes, short]{biblatex-chicago}?



In my original question, I had asked for a command that would print the editor's full name and the book's publication information (address: publisher, date) the first time an edition was referenced and then a short version (just editor's name) on subsequent citations.



What I would like it to do when the short option is activated is to use the short version (just editor's name) already the first time the edition is cited.






citing biblatex-chicago







share|improve this question























  • Should the first citation be the editor's full name or just family name?

    – David Purton
    4 hours ago











  • Just family name.

    – Alex Roberts
    28 mins ago
















2















Some time ago, David Purton (@DavidPurton) kindly devised a set of commands --- edcite{}, edvolcite{}{}, transcite{}, etc. --- for referencing just the editor or translator and publication information of an edition of an ancient or medieval primary text.



My question today involves the same MWE as before: is there a simple way to get edcite{} and its siblings to conform to the short option in the command usepackage[notes, short]{biblatex-chicago}?



In my original question, I had asked for a command that would print the editor's full name and the book's publication information (address: publisher, date) the first time an edition was referenced and then a short version (just editor's name) on subsequent citations.



What I would like it to do when the short option is activated is to use the short version (just editor's name) already the first time the edition is cited.






citing biblatex-chicago







share|improve this question























  • Should the first citation be the editor's full name or just family name?

    – David Purton
    4 hours ago











  • Just family name.

    – Alex Roberts
    28 mins ago














2












2








2








Some time ago, David Purton (@DavidPurton) kindly devised a set of commands --- edcite{}, edvolcite{}{}, transcite{}, etc. --- for referencing just the editor or translator and publication information of an edition of an ancient or medieval primary text.



My question today involves the same MWE as before: is there a simple way to get edcite{} and its siblings to conform to the short option in the command usepackage[notes, short]{biblatex-chicago}?



In my original question, I had asked for a command that would print the editor's full name and the book's publication information (address: publisher, date) the first time an edition was referenced and then a short version (just editor's name) on subsequent citations.



What I would like it to do when the short option is activated is to use the short version (just editor's name) already the first time the edition is cited.






citing biblatex-chicago







share|improve this question














Some time ago, David Purton (@DavidPurton) kindly devised a set of commands --- edcite{}, edvolcite{}{}, transcite{}, etc. --- for referencing just the editor or translator and publication information of an edition of an ancient or medieval primary text.



My question today involves the same MWE as before: is there a simple way to get edcite{} and its siblings to conform to the short option in the command usepackage[notes, short]{biblatex-chicago}?



In my original question, I had asked for a command that would print the editor's full name and the book's publication information (address: publisher, date) the first time an edition was referenced and then a short version (just editor's name) on subsequent citations.



What I would like it to do when the short option is activated is to use the short version (just editor's name) already the first time the edition is cited.






citing biblatex-chicago




citing biblatex-chicago






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









Alex RobertsAlex Roberts

501211




501211













  • Should the first citation be the editor's full name or just family name?

    – David Purton
    4 hours ago











  • Just family name.

    – Alex Roberts
    28 mins ago



















  • Should the first citation be the editor's full name or just family name?

    – David Purton
    4 hours ago











  • Just family name.

    – Alex Roberts
    28 mins ago

















Should the first citation be the editor's full name or just family name?

– David Purton
4 hours ago





Should the first citation be the editor's full name or just family name?

– David Purton
4 hours ago













Just family name.

– Alex Roberts
28 mins ago





Just family name.

– Alex Roberts
28 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














To skip straight to the short form, you can test if either the citation has already been seen or the toggle cms@allshort (which is set by the short package option) is set to true.



Change the edcite macro to:



newbibmacro*{edcite}{%

  ifboolexpr{

    test {ifciteibid}

    and

    not test {iffirstonpage}

  }

    {usebibmacro{cite:ibid}}

    {ifboolexpr{

      test {ifciteseen}

      or

      togl {cms@allshort}

     }

       {printnames[labelname]{editor}}

       {printnames[given-family]{editor}%

        newcunit

        usebibmacro{cpubl+loc+year}}}}





share|improve this answer


























  • Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

    – Alex Roberts
    4 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473256%2fhow-to-make-edcite-skip-straight-to-the-short-form-when-biblatex-chicago-short%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














To skip straight to the short form, you can test if either the citation has already been seen or the toggle cms@allshort (which is set by the short package option) is set to true.



Change the edcite macro to:



newbibmacro*{edcite}{%

  ifboolexpr{

    test {ifciteibid}

    and

    not test {iffirstonpage}

  }

    {usebibmacro{cite:ibid}}

    {ifboolexpr{

      test {ifciteseen}

      or

      togl {cms@allshort}

     }

       {printnames[labelname]{editor}}

       {printnames[given-family]{editor}%

        newcunit

        usebibmacro{cpubl+loc+year}}}}





share|improve this answer


























  • Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

    – Alex Roberts
    4 mins ago
















3














To skip straight to the short form, you can test if either the citation has already been seen or the toggle cms@allshort (which is set by the short package option) is set to true.



Change the edcite macro to:



newbibmacro*{edcite}{%

  ifboolexpr{

    test {ifciteibid}

    and

    not test {iffirstonpage}

  }

    {usebibmacro{cite:ibid}}

    {ifboolexpr{

      test {ifciteseen}

      or

      togl {cms@allshort}

     }

       {printnames[labelname]{editor}}

       {printnames[given-family]{editor}%

        newcunit

        usebibmacro{cpubl+loc+year}}}}





share|improve this answer


























  • Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

    – Alex Roberts
    4 mins ago














3












3








3







To skip straight to the short form, you can test if either the citation has already been seen or the toggle cms@allshort (which is set by the short package option) is set to true.



Change the edcite macro to:



newbibmacro*{edcite}{%

  ifboolexpr{

    test {ifciteibid}

    and

    not test {iffirstonpage}

  }

    {usebibmacro{cite:ibid}}

    {ifboolexpr{

      test {ifciteseen}

      or

      togl {cms@allshort}

     }

       {printnames[labelname]{editor}}

       {printnames[given-family]{editor}%

        newcunit

        usebibmacro{cpubl+loc+year}}}}





share|improve this answer















To skip straight to the short form, you can test if either the citation has already been seen or the toggle cms@allshort (which is set by the short package option) is set to true.



Change the edcite macro to:



newbibmacro*{edcite}{%

  ifboolexpr{

    test {ifciteibid}

    and

    not test {iffirstonpage}

  }

    {usebibmacro{cite:ibid}}

    {ifboolexpr{

      test {ifciteseen}

      or

      togl {cms@allshort}

     }

       {printnames[labelname]{editor}}

       {printnames[given-family]{editor}%

        newcunit

        usebibmacro{cpubl+loc+year}}}}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 26 mins ago

























answered 4 hours ago









David PurtonDavid Purton

9,3301835




9,3301835













  • Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

    – Alex Roberts
    4 mins ago



















  • Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

    – Alex Roberts
    4 mins ago

















Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

– Alex Roberts
4 mins ago





Wonderful, thank you! It's great to have this keyed to the short option.

– Alex Roberts
4 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473256%2fhow-to-make-edcite-skip-straight-to-the-short-form-when-biblatex-chicago-short%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

CARDNET

Image
CARDNET は日本カードネットワークが運営するクレジット決済ネットワーク。日本カードネットワークの略称としてもCARDNETが使用されている。 事件・事故 2017年4月15日午前11時8分からクレジットカードの決済がしづらくなる障害が発生した。障害は同日午後5時18分に復旧した。原因は、複数あるCARDNETセンターの拠点のうち1つで、2重化してあるL3スイッチの片方が故障し、1系統にトラフィックが集中したことによる輻輳が発生したため。対処としては、故障したL3スイッチ交換とシステム再起動が行われた [1] 。 出典 ^ 金子寛人 ( 2017年4月17日 ). “CARDNETのクレジット決済に6時間強障害、原因はL3スイッチ故障”. 日経コンピュータ. 2018年10月18日 閲覧。 この項目は、コンピュータに関連した 書きかけの項目 です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています（PJ:コンピュータ/P:コンピュータ）。 この項目は、経済に関連した 書きかけの項目 です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています（ポータル 経済学、プロジェクト 経済）。 This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
Read more

Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

Image
0 I am on a system dual-booting Windows and Debian (usually using the latter), and a recent Windows update appears to have wreaked havoc on the Debian boot system. I managed to boot Windows again, but not Linux. Following online suggestions, I created a Live USB of Ubuntu, and booted from that. Then I have installed and run the boot-repair utility. The utility instructs me to type several lines including sudo chroot "/mnt/boot-sav/sda6" apt-get purge -y grub*-common grub-common:i386 To which I receive the error E: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386 I am given to understand the issue may have to do with having UEFI vs BIOS (I believe I have UEFI), but do not understand this well. In any case I have subsequently run the boot-repair BootInfo Summary utility which created the following file h...
Read more

濃尾地震

Image
濃尾地震 『岐阜市街大地震之図』 歌川国利画 本震 発生日 1891年（明治24年）10月28日 発生時刻 6時38分50秒（JST） 震央 日本 岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市） 北緯35度35分 東経136度20分（ 地図 ） 規模    マグニチュード（M）8.0 最大震度    震度7： 注1 福井県今立郡鯖江町、愛知県葉栗郡大田島村、東春日井郡勝川村 地震の種類 直下型地震 被害 死傷者数 死者7,273人、負傷者17,175人 注1：当時の震度階級では「激烈」 プロジェクト:地球科学 プロジェクト:災害 テンプレートを表示 濃尾地震 （のうびじしん）は、1891年（明治24年）10月28日に濃尾地方で発生した、日本史上最大の内陸地殻内地震。「 美濃・尾張地震 （みの・おわりじしん）」とも呼ばれている。辛卯の年に発生したことから 辛卯震災 と呼んでいる報告書もある。 目次 1 概要 1.1 震源断層 2 被害 3 各地の震度 4 前兆現象 5 報道 6 学術的な意義 7 地震防災 8 脚注 9 関連項目 10 外部リンク 概要 濃尾地震発生当時の根尾谷断層 濃尾地震を引き起こした根尾谷断層 写真中央を斜めに走る段差が根尾谷断層 濃尾地震は、1891年10月28日6時38分50秒に発生した。震源は、岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市）、北緯35度35分、東経136度20分付近。河角廣 (1951) は岐阜市付近（北緯35.6度、東経136.6度）に震央を仮定し規模 M K = 7.0 を与え [1] 、マグニチュードは M = 8.4 に換算されているが、明治・大正期の地震については0.5程度大きく見積もられているとされる [2] 。また、震央距離と震度との関係など当時のデータから後にM8.0 [3] とも推定される。アメリカ地質調査所 (USGS) でも8.0としている [4] 。「根尾谷断層帯」が活動した典型的な内陸地殻内地震（いわゆる直下型地震）であり、これは記録が残っている日本の内陸...
Read more