Why isn't After ordering correctly?












0















My docker.prom.service unit file has:



After=docker.service media-data.mount


media-data.mount has a chain of:



media-data.mount +280ms
└─remote-fs-pre.target @2.116s
└─rpcbind.service @2.261s +13ms
└─rpcbind.socket @1.549s
└─sysinit.target @1.534s
└─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
└─local-fs.target @1.346s
└─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
└─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
└─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
└─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
└─system.slice @277ms
└─-.slice @235ms


docker.prom.service has a chain of:



docker.prom.service @5.483s
└─docker.service @1.976s +3.491s
└─network-online.target @1.974s
└─network.target @1.972s
└─networking.service @1.533s +436ms
└─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
└─local-fs.target @1.346s
└─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
└─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
└─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
└─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
└─system.slice @277ms
└─-.slice @235ms



I would expect to see media-data.mount in the critical chain of docker.prom.service since media-data.mount is explicitly called out in the After= line of the docker.prom.service file.



Am I missing something obvious?










share|improve this question







New contributor




cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    My docker.prom.service unit file has:



    After=docker.service media-data.mount


    media-data.mount has a chain of:



    media-data.mount +280ms
    └─remote-fs-pre.target @2.116s
    └─rpcbind.service @2.261s +13ms
    └─rpcbind.socket @1.549s
    └─sysinit.target @1.534s
    └─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
    └─local-fs.target @1.346s
    └─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
    └─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
    └─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
    └─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
    └─system.slice @277ms
    └─-.slice @235ms


    docker.prom.service has a chain of:



    docker.prom.service @5.483s
    └─docker.service @1.976s +3.491s
    └─network-online.target @1.974s
    └─network.target @1.972s
    └─networking.service @1.533s +436ms
    └─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
    └─local-fs.target @1.346s
    └─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
    └─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
    └─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
    └─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
    └─system.slice @277ms
    └─-.slice @235ms



    I would expect to see media-data.mount in the critical chain of docker.prom.service since media-data.mount is explicitly called out in the After= line of the docker.prom.service file.



    Am I missing something obvious?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      My docker.prom.service unit file has:



      After=docker.service media-data.mount


      media-data.mount has a chain of:



      media-data.mount +280ms
      └─remote-fs-pre.target @2.116s
      └─rpcbind.service @2.261s +13ms
      └─rpcbind.socket @1.549s
      └─sysinit.target @1.534s
      └─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
      └─local-fs.target @1.346s
      └─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
      └─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
      └─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
      └─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
      └─system.slice @277ms
      └─-.slice @235ms


      docker.prom.service has a chain of:



      docker.prom.service @5.483s
      └─docker.service @1.976s +3.491s
      └─network-online.target @1.974s
      └─network.target @1.972s
      └─networking.service @1.533s +436ms
      └─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
      └─local-fs.target @1.346s
      └─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
      └─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
      └─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
      └─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
      └─system.slice @277ms
      └─-.slice @235ms



      I would expect to see media-data.mount in the critical chain of docker.prom.service since media-data.mount is explicitly called out in the After= line of the docker.prom.service file.



      Am I missing something obvious?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      My docker.prom.service unit file has:



      After=docker.service media-data.mount


      media-data.mount has a chain of:



      media-data.mount +280ms
      └─remote-fs-pre.target @2.116s
      └─rpcbind.service @2.261s +13ms
      └─rpcbind.socket @1.549s
      └─sysinit.target @1.534s
      └─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
      └─local-fs.target @1.346s
      └─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
      └─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
      └─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
      └─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
      └─system.slice @277ms
      └─-.slice @235ms


      docker.prom.service has a chain of:



      docker.prom.service @5.483s
      └─docker.service @1.976s +3.491s
      └─network-online.target @1.974s
      └─network.target @1.972s
      └─networking.service @1.533s +436ms
      └─apparmor.service @1.349s +168ms
      └─local-fs.target @1.346s
      └─var-lib-docker-aufs-mnt-fd982b7186fd056a83f57948112a542ac04a6b161e58fdde16fe3191f7279915.mount @6.882s
      └─local-fs-pre.target @678ms
      └─lvm2-monitor.service @417ms +250ms
      └─lvm2-lvmetad.service @558ms
      └─system.slice @277ms
      └─-.slice @235ms



      I would expect to see media-data.mount in the critical chain of docker.prom.service since media-data.mount is explicitly called out in the After= line of the docker.prom.service file.



      Am I missing something obvious?







      systemd






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 46 mins ago









      cryptykcryptyk

      1




      1




      New contributor




      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      cryptyk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          cryptyk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502213%2fwhy-isnt-after-ordering-correctly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          cryptyk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          cryptyk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          cryptyk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          cryptyk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502213%2fwhy-isnt-after-ordering-correctly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          CARDNET

          Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

          濃尾地震