Find file and directory size while ignoring symlink in sub-directories












0















I have a directory structure where there are multiple symlinks at random depths.



For illustration purpose:



/fs
/fs/afile
/fs/blink -> /usr/local/lib
/fs/cdir/cfile
/fs/cdir/cdir/cdir/clink -> /var/log
/fs/edir/edir/efile
/fs/edir/elink -> /usr/local/bin


I want to find which file or folder utilizes the most space to do some cleanup. I am hoping an output similar to:



3.0G     /fs
4.0G /fs/afile
3.3G /fs/cdir
15.0G /fs/edir


I tried running cd /fs && find -maxdepth 1 -type d | sudo xargs du -hs but this expands the symlinks underneath, which means the size of /fs/edir would include the contents and size of /usr/local/bin in this case.



TLDR: For a given path, how do I find the size of all files or directories at depth=1, without expanding any underneath symlinks?



Note: I read du skip symbolic links but this case is different as the symlink in this case could be of any depth.









share







New contributor




Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    I have a directory structure where there are multiple symlinks at random depths.



    For illustration purpose:



    /fs
    /fs/afile
    /fs/blink -> /usr/local/lib
    /fs/cdir/cfile
    /fs/cdir/cdir/cdir/clink -> /var/log
    /fs/edir/edir/efile
    /fs/edir/elink -> /usr/local/bin


    I want to find which file or folder utilizes the most space to do some cleanup. I am hoping an output similar to:



    3.0G     /fs
    4.0G /fs/afile
    3.3G /fs/cdir
    15.0G /fs/edir


    I tried running cd /fs && find -maxdepth 1 -type d | sudo xargs du -hs but this expands the symlinks underneath, which means the size of /fs/edir would include the contents and size of /usr/local/bin in this case.



    TLDR: For a given path, how do I find the size of all files or directories at depth=1, without expanding any underneath symlinks?



    Note: I read du skip symbolic links but this case is different as the symlink in this case could be of any depth.









    share







    New contributor




    Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      I have a directory structure where there are multiple symlinks at random depths.



      For illustration purpose:



      /fs
      /fs/afile
      /fs/blink -> /usr/local/lib
      /fs/cdir/cfile
      /fs/cdir/cdir/cdir/clink -> /var/log
      /fs/edir/edir/efile
      /fs/edir/elink -> /usr/local/bin


      I want to find which file or folder utilizes the most space to do some cleanup. I am hoping an output similar to:



      3.0G     /fs
      4.0G /fs/afile
      3.3G /fs/cdir
      15.0G /fs/edir


      I tried running cd /fs && find -maxdepth 1 -type d | sudo xargs du -hs but this expands the symlinks underneath, which means the size of /fs/edir would include the contents and size of /usr/local/bin in this case.



      TLDR: For a given path, how do I find the size of all files or directories at depth=1, without expanding any underneath symlinks?



      Note: I read du skip symbolic links but this case is different as the symlink in this case could be of any depth.









      share







      New contributor




      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I have a directory structure where there are multiple symlinks at random depths.



      For illustration purpose:



      /fs
      /fs/afile
      /fs/blink -> /usr/local/lib
      /fs/cdir/cfile
      /fs/cdir/cdir/cdir/clink -> /var/log
      /fs/edir/edir/efile
      /fs/edir/elink -> /usr/local/bin


      I want to find which file or folder utilizes the most space to do some cleanup. I am hoping an output similar to:



      3.0G     /fs
      4.0G /fs/afile
      3.3G /fs/cdir
      15.0G /fs/edir


      I tried running cd /fs && find -maxdepth 1 -type d | sudo xargs du -hs but this expands the symlinks underneath, which means the size of /fs/edir would include the contents and size of /usr/local/bin in this case.



      TLDR: For a given path, how do I find the size of all files or directories at depth=1, without expanding any underneath symlinks?



      Note: I read du skip symbolic links but this case is different as the symlink in this case could be of any depth.







      disk-usage





      share







      New contributor




      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 mins ago









      Victor WongVictor Wong

      1012




      1012




      New contributor




      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Victor Wong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Victor Wong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507901%2ffind-file-and-directory-size-while-ignoring-symlink-in-sub-directories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Victor Wong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Victor Wong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Victor Wong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Victor Wong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507901%2ffind-file-and-directory-size-while-ignoring-symlink-in-sub-directories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          CARDNET

          Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

          濃尾地震