Can verbs simutaniously use the volitional form and negative form?












2















I came across the following sentence in a book:




身体を起こし、手足がこれといった支障もなく動くのを確かめた。




and searched on Jisho.org for 障もなく. It sent me to https://jisho.org/search/障む, saying that "障もなく is the negative form" of 障む。



However, I know that for that to be correct, it would have to be まなくて, not what is written in the book. Then I remembered that the も could be from the volitional form; and looked through my Genki 2 textbook, but failed to find the conjugation for negative volitional phrases, which means that 障もなく is either not volitional, not negative, or I'm leaping down another dead-end rabbit hole again via wrong analysis of what the text means.






grammar usage conjugations parsing







share|improve this question

























  • The Jisho.org result appears speculative, not definitive.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago











  • @BJCUAI Do you have any definitive alternative dictionaries then?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @ToyuFrey No, neither would there be, as you are using a conjugated form. Not really the point though... "障もなく is the negative form" appears from you as a direct quote, where that seems to be a misrepresentation.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    You don’t need to type a space after a comma in Japanese. It has the right amount of space built-in.

    – snailboat♦
    2 hours ago











  • @snailboat I put the spaces after the comma so I can read it better and to better differentiate the two sections, as my eyesight is not so good despite wearing glasses. (the font is just super tiny on my computer screen, and the extra space helps a bunch)

    – Toyu_Frey
    1 hour ago


















2















I came across the following sentence in a book:




身体を起こし、手足がこれといった支障もなく動くのを確かめた。




and searched on Jisho.org for 障もなく. It sent me to https://jisho.org/search/障む, saying that "障もなく is the negative form" of 障む。



However, I know that for that to be correct, it would have to be まなくて, not what is written in the book. Then I remembered that the も could be from the volitional form; and looked through my Genki 2 textbook, but failed to find the conjugation for negative volitional phrases, which means that 障もなく is either not volitional, not negative, or I'm leaping down another dead-end rabbit hole again via wrong analysis of what the text means.






grammar usage conjugations parsing







share|improve this question

























  • The Jisho.org result appears speculative, not definitive.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago











  • @BJCUAI Do you have any definitive alternative dictionaries then?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @ToyuFrey No, neither would there be, as you are using a conjugated form. Not really the point though... "障もなく is the negative form" appears from you as a direct quote, where that seems to be a misrepresentation.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    You don’t need to type a space after a comma in Japanese. It has the right amount of space built-in.

    – snailboat♦
    2 hours ago











  • @snailboat I put the spaces after the comma so I can read it better and to better differentiate the two sections, as my eyesight is not so good despite wearing glasses. (the font is just super tiny on my computer screen, and the extra space helps a bunch)

    – Toyu_Frey
    1 hour ago
















2












2








2








I came across the following sentence in a book:




身体を起こし、手足がこれといった支障もなく動くのを確かめた。




and searched on Jisho.org for 障もなく. It sent me to https://jisho.org/search/障む, saying that "障もなく is the negative form" of 障む。



However, I know that for that to be correct, it would have to be まなくて, not what is written in the book. Then I remembered that the も could be from the volitional form; and looked through my Genki 2 textbook, but failed to find the conjugation for negative volitional phrases, which means that 障もなく is either not volitional, not negative, or I'm leaping down another dead-end rabbit hole again via wrong analysis of what the text means.






grammar usage conjugations parsing







share|improve this question
















I came across the following sentence in a book:




身体を起こし、手足がこれといった支障もなく動くのを確かめた。




and searched on Jisho.org for 障もなく. It sent me to https://jisho.org/search/障む, saying that "障もなく is the negative form" of 障む。



However, I know that for that to be correct, it would have to be まなくて, not what is written in the book. Then I remembered that the も could be from the volitional form; and looked through my Genki 2 textbook, but failed to find the conjugation for negative volitional phrases, which means that 障もなく is either not volitional, not negative, or I'm leaping down another dead-end rabbit hole again via wrong analysis of what the text means.






grammar usage conjugations parsing




grammar usage conjugations parsing






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Chocolate♦

48.2k458121




48.2k458121










asked 5 hours ago









Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

41619




41619













  • The Jisho.org result appears speculative, not definitive.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago











  • @BJCUAI Do you have any definitive alternative dictionaries then?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @ToyuFrey No, neither would there be, as you are using a conjugated form. Not really the point though... "障もなく is the negative form" appears from you as a direct quote, where that seems to be a misrepresentation.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    You don’t need to type a space after a comma in Japanese. It has the right amount of space built-in.

    – snailboat♦
    2 hours ago











  • @snailboat I put the spaces after the comma so I can read it better and to better differentiate the two sections, as my eyesight is not so good despite wearing glasses. (the font is just super tiny on my computer screen, and the extra space helps a bunch)

    – Toyu_Frey
    1 hour ago





















  • The Jisho.org result appears speculative, not definitive.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago











  • @BJCUAI Do you have any definitive alternative dictionaries then?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @ToyuFrey No, neither would there be, as you are using a conjugated form. Not really the point though... "障もなく is the negative form" appears from you as a direct quote, where that seems to be a misrepresentation.

    – BJCUAI
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    You don’t need to type a space after a comma in Japanese. It has the right amount of space built-in.

    – snailboat♦
    2 hours ago











  • @snailboat I put the spaces after the comma so I can read it better and to better differentiate the two sections, as my eyesight is not so good despite wearing glasses. (the font is just super tiny on my computer screen, and the extra space helps a bunch)

    – Toyu_Frey
    1 hour ago



















The Jisho.org result appears speculative, not definitive.

– BJCUAI
3 hours ago





The Jisho.org result appears speculative, not definitive.

– BJCUAI
3 hours ago













@BJCUAI Do you have any definitive alternative dictionaries then?

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago





@BJCUAI Do you have any definitive alternative dictionaries then?

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago




1




1





@ToyuFrey No, neither would there be, as you are using a conjugated form. Not really the point though... "障もなく is the negative form" appears from you as a direct quote, where that seems to be a misrepresentation.

– BJCUAI
3 hours ago





@ToyuFrey No, neither would there be, as you are using a conjugated form. Not really the point though... "障もなく is the negative form" appears from you as a direct quote, where that seems to be a misrepresentation.

– BJCUAI
3 hours ago




2




2





You don’t need to type a space after a comma in Japanese. It has the right amount of space built-in.

– snailboat♦
2 hours ago





You don’t need to type a space after a comma in Japanese. It has the right amount of space built-in.

– snailboat♦
2 hours ago













@snailboat I put the spaces after the comma so I can read it better and to better differentiate the two sections, as my eyesight is not so good despite wearing glasses. (the font is just super tiny on my computer screen, and the extra space helps a bunch)

– Toyu_Frey
1 hour ago







@snailboat I put the spaces after the comma so I can read it better and to better differentiate the two sections, as my eyesight is not so good despite wearing glasses. (the font is just super tiny on my computer screen, and the extra space helps a bunch)

– Toyu_Frey
1 hour ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














There is a negative volitional. It's ~まい and it's not super common outside some fixed patterns like




あろうことかあるまいことか



子供じゃあるまいし




However, it doesn't apply here anyways as that's not the grammar that's happening here. By the way, Jisho made a parsing mistake: the negative form of 障む is 障まない.



The main issue is that you seem to be parsing the sentence incorrectly. 支障 is a noun. The もない means without any and なく is the continuative form of ない (it works here like an adverb pretty much). Maybe you've seen the phrase 何もない before? So then 支障もない means without any 支障.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

    – naruto
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

    – BJCUAI
    4 hours ago











  • I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • @naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

    – Ringil
    2 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65893%2fcan-verbs-simutaniously-use-the-volitional-form-and-negative-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














There is a negative volitional. It's ~まい and it's not super common outside some fixed patterns like




あろうことかあるまいことか



子供じゃあるまいし




However, it doesn't apply here anyways as that's not the grammar that's happening here. By the way, Jisho made a parsing mistake: the negative form of 障む is 障まない.



The main issue is that you seem to be parsing the sentence incorrectly. 支障 is a noun. The もない means without any and なく is the continuative form of ない (it works here like an adverb pretty much). Maybe you've seen the phrase 何もない before? So then 支障もない means without any 支障.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

    – naruto
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

    – BJCUAI
    4 hours ago











  • I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • @naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

    – Ringil
    2 hours ago
















3














There is a negative volitional. It's ~まい and it's not super common outside some fixed patterns like




あろうことかあるまいことか



子供じゃあるまいし




However, it doesn't apply here anyways as that's not the grammar that's happening here. By the way, Jisho made a parsing mistake: the negative form of 障む is 障まない.



The main issue is that you seem to be parsing the sentence incorrectly. 支障 is a noun. The もない means without any and なく is the continuative form of ない (it works here like an adverb pretty much). Maybe you've seen the phrase 何もない before? So then 支障もない means without any 支障.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

    – naruto
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

    – BJCUAI
    4 hours ago











  • I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • @naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

    – Ringil
    2 hours ago














3












3








3







There is a negative volitional. It's ~まい and it's not super common outside some fixed patterns like




あろうことかあるまいことか



子供じゃあるまいし




However, it doesn't apply here anyways as that's not the grammar that's happening here. By the way, Jisho made a parsing mistake: the negative form of 障む is 障まない.



The main issue is that you seem to be parsing the sentence incorrectly. 支障 is a noun. The もない means without any and なく is the continuative form of ない (it works here like an adverb pretty much). Maybe you've seen the phrase 何もない before? So then 支障もない means without any 支障.






share|improve this answer















There is a negative volitional. It's ~まい and it's not super common outside some fixed patterns like




あろうことかあるまいことか



子供じゃあるまいし




However, it doesn't apply here anyways as that's not the grammar that's happening here. By the way, Jisho made a parsing mistake: the negative form of 障む is 障まない.



The main issue is that you seem to be parsing the sentence incorrectly. 支障 is a noun. The もない means without any and なく is the continuative form of ない (it works here like an adverb pretty much). Maybe you've seen the phrase 何もない before? So then 支障もない means without any 支障.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 5 hours ago









RingilRingil

4,00921133




4,00921133








  • 3





    「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

    – naruto
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

    – BJCUAI
    4 hours ago











  • I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • @naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

    – Ringil
    2 hours ago














  • 3





    「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

    – naruto
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

    – BJCUAI
    4 hours ago











  • I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • @naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

    – Ringil
    2 hours ago








3




3





「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

– naruto
4 hours ago





「障害」ではなく「支障」ですね

– naruto
4 hours ago




2




2





I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

– BJCUAI
4 hours ago





I think the answer would be more effective using the noun included in the OP's referenced quote, namely 支障, rather than 障害.

– BJCUAI
4 hours ago













I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago





I should have made the connection before posting the question, as I have heard the phrase 何もない multiple times before; I've just never learned continuative forms. (I have a lot of self-studying to do.)

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago













@naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

– Ringil
2 hours ago





@naruto Thanks for pointing that out, that was pretty bad. Sometimes you just see things....

– Ringil
2 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65893%2fcan-verbs-simutaniously-use-the-volitional-form-and-negative-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

CARDNET

Image
CARDNET は日本カードネットワークが運営するクレジット決済ネットワーク。日本カードネットワークの略称としてもCARDNETが使用されている。 事件・事故 2017年4月15日午前11時8分からクレジットカードの決済がしづらくなる障害が発生した。障害は同日午後5時18分に復旧した。原因は、複数あるCARDNETセンターの拠点のうち1つで、2重化してあるL3スイッチの片方が故障し、1系統にトラフィックが集中したことによる輻輳が発生したため。対処としては、故障したL3スイッチ交換とシステム再起動が行われた [1] 。 出典 ^ 金子寛人 ( 2017年4月17日 ). “CARDNETのクレジット決済に6時間強障害、原因はL3スイッチ故障”. 日経コンピュータ. 2018年10月18日 閲覧。 この項目は、コンピュータに関連した 書きかけの項目 です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています（PJ:コンピュータ/P:コンピュータ）。 この項目は、経済に関連した 書きかけの項目 です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています（ポータル 経済学、プロジェクト 経済）。 This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
Read more

Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

Image
0 I am on a system dual-booting Windows and Debian (usually using the latter), and a recent Windows update appears to have wreaked havoc on the Debian boot system. I managed to boot Windows again, but not Linux. Following online suggestions, I created a Live USB of Ubuntu, and booted from that. Then I have installed and run the boot-repair utility. The utility instructs me to type several lines including sudo chroot "/mnt/boot-sav/sda6" apt-get purge -y grub*-common grub-common:i386 To which I receive the error E: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386 I am given to understand the issue may have to do with having UEFI vs BIOS (I believe I have UEFI), but do not understand this well. In any case I have subsequently run the boot-repair BootInfo Summary utility which created the following file h...
Read more

濃尾地震

Image
濃尾地震 『岐阜市街大地震之図』 歌川国利画 本震 発生日 1891年（明治24年）10月28日 発生時刻 6時38分50秒（JST） 震央 日本 岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市） 北緯35度35分 東経136度20分（ 地図 ） 規模    マグニチュード（M）8.0 最大震度    震度7： 注1 福井県今立郡鯖江町、愛知県葉栗郡大田島村、東春日井郡勝川村 地震の種類 直下型地震 被害 死傷者数 死者7,273人、負傷者17,175人 注1：当時の震度階級では「激烈」 プロジェクト:地球科学 プロジェクト:災害 テンプレートを表示 濃尾地震 （のうびじしん）は、1891年（明治24年）10月28日に濃尾地方で発生した、日本史上最大の内陸地殻内地震。「 美濃・尾張地震 （みの・おわりじしん）」とも呼ばれている。辛卯の年に発生したことから 辛卯震災 と呼んでいる報告書もある。 目次 1 概要 1.1 震源断層 2 被害 3 各地の震度 4 前兆現象 5 報道 6 学術的な意義 7 地震防災 8 脚注 9 関連項目 10 外部リンク 概要 濃尾地震発生当時の根尾谷断層 濃尾地震を引き起こした根尾谷断層 写真中央を斜めに走る段差が根尾谷断層 濃尾地震は、1891年10月28日6時38分50秒に発生した。震源は、岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市）、北緯35度35分、東経136度20分付近。河角廣 (1951) は岐阜市付近（北緯35.6度、東経136.6度）に震央を仮定し規模 M K = 7.0 を与え [1] 、マグニチュードは M = 8.4 に換算されているが、明治・大正期の地震については0.5程度大きく見積もられているとされる [2] 。また、震央距離と震度との関係など当時のデータから後にM8.0 [3] とも推定される。アメリカ地質調査所 (USGS) でも8.0としている [4] 。「根尾谷断層帯」が活動した典型的な内陸地殻内地震（いわゆる直下型地震）であり、これは記録が残っている日本の内陸...
Read more