Is it a Cyclops number? “Nobody” knows!












1












$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    46 mins ago
















1












$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    46 mins ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary




code-golf number decision-problem binary






share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 42 mins ago







Tau













New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









TauTau

1165




1165




New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    46 mins ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    46 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
$endgroup$
– Tau
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
$endgroup$
– Tau
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Note: This is A129868
$endgroup$
– tsh
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Note: This is A129868
$endgroup$
– tsh
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Should 119 be true?
$endgroup$
– Quintec
46 mins ago




$begingroup$
Should 119 be true?
$endgroup$
– Quintec
46 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$


Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



¢èT ¶1©¢ês


That's more like it...



Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



Try it online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – Embodiment of Ignorance
    15 mins ago





















2












$begingroup$

Japt, 8 bytes



¤øT ©¢ês


Based off of Quintec's solution.



Try it Online!



Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



Try it Online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    41 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
    $endgroup$
    – Embodiment of Ignorance
    41 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Update: found shorter way :)
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    32 mins ago



















0












$begingroup$


Perl 6, 23 bytes





{.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


Try it online!



Regex based solution






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$


    JavaScript (Node.js), 32 bytes





    f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p/2,q+q|2):!(p^q)


    Try it online!



    31 bytes version





    f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p>>1,q+q|2):p==q


    This one will report falsy for 0.





    JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





    p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "200"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181128%2fis-it-a-cyclops-number-nobody-knows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        15 mins ago


















      2












      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        15 mins ago
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 34 mins ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      QuintecQuintec

      1,9781726




      1,9781726












      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        15 mins ago




















      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        15 mins ago


















      $begingroup$
      found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      15 mins ago






      $begingroup$
      found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      15 mins ago













      2












      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago
















      2












      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 16 mins ago

























      answered 44 mins ago









      Embodiment of IgnoranceEmbodiment of Ignorance

      1,516123




      1,516123












      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        41 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago
















      $begingroup$
      Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      41 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      41 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      41 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      41 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      Update: found shorter way :)
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      32 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Update: found shorter way :)
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      32 mins ago











      0












      $begingroup$


      Perl 6, 23 bytes





      {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


      Try it online!



      Regex based solution






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$


        Perl 6, 23 bytes





        {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


        Try it online!



        Regex based solution






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$


          Perl 6, 23 bytes





          {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


          Try it online!



          Regex based solution






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          Perl 6, 23 bytes





          {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


          Try it online!



          Regex based solution







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 37 mins ago









          Jo KingJo King

          24.4k357126




          24.4k357126























              0












              $begingroup$


              JavaScript (Node.js), 32 bytes





              f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p/2,q+q|2):!(p^q)


              Try it online!



              31 bytes version





              f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p>>1,q+q|2):p==q


              This one will report falsy for 0.





              JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





              p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$


                JavaScript (Node.js), 32 bytes





                f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p/2,q+q|2):!(p^q)


                Try it online!



                31 bytes version





                f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p>>1,q+q|2):p==q


                This one will report falsy for 0.





                JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$


                  JavaScript (Node.js), 32 bytes





                  f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p/2,q+q|2):!(p^q)


                  Try it online!



                  31 bytes version





                  f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p>>1,q+q|2):p==q


                  This one will report falsy for 0.





                  JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                  p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                  Try it online!






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$




                  JavaScript (Node.js), 32 bytes





                  f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p/2,q+q|2):!(p^q)


                  Try it online!



                  31 bytes version





                  f=(p,q)=>p&1?f(p>>1,q+q|2):p==q


                  This one will report falsy for 0.





                  JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                  p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                  Try it online!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 3 mins ago

























                  answered 35 mins ago









                  tshtsh

                  9,32511652




                  9,32511652






















                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      If this is an answer to a challenge…




                      • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                      • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                        Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                      • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                      More generally…




                      • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                      • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).





                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181128%2fis-it-a-cyclops-number-nobody-knows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      CARDNET

                      Image
                      CARDNET は日本カードネットワークが運営するクレジット決済ネットワーク。日本カードネットワークの略称としてもCARDNETが使用されている。 事件・事故 2017年4月15日午前11時8分からクレジットカードの決済がしづらくなる障害が発生した。障害は同日午後5時18分に復旧した。原因は、複数あるCARDNETセンターの拠点のうち1つで、2重化してあるL3スイッチの片方が故障し、1系統にトラフィックが集中したことによる輻輳が発生したため。対処としては、故障したL3スイッチ交換とシステム再起動が行われた [1] 。 出典 ^ 金子寛人 ( 2017年4月17日 ). “CARDNETのクレジット決済に6時間強障害、原因はL3スイッチ故障”. 日経コンピュータ. 2018年10月18日 閲覧。 この項目は、コンピュータに関連した 書きかけの項目 です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています（PJ:コンピュータ/P:コンピュータ）。 この項目は、経済に関連した 書きかけの項目 です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています（ポータル 経済学、プロジェクト 経済）。 This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
                      Read more

                      Boot-repair Failure: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386

                      Image
                      0 I am on a system dual-booting Windows and Debian (usually using the latter), and a recent Windows update appears to have wreaked havoc on the Debian boot system. I managed to boot Windows again, but not Linux. Following online suggestions, I created a Live USB of Ubuntu, and booted from that. Then I have installed and run the boot-repair utility. The utility instructs me to type several lines including sudo chroot "/mnt/boot-sav/sda6" apt-get purge -y grub*-common grub-common:i386 To which I receive the error E: Unable to locate package grub-common:i386 I am given to understand the issue may have to do with having UEFI vs BIOS (I believe I have UEFI), but do not understand this well. In any case I have subsequently run the boot-repair BootInfo Summary utility which created the following file h
                      Read more

                      濃尾地震

                      Image
                      濃尾地震 『岐阜市街大地震之図』 歌川国利画 本震 発生日 1891年（明治24年）10月28日 発生時刻 6時38分50秒（JST） 震央 日本 岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市） 北緯35度35分 東経136度20分（ 地図 ） 規模    マグニチュード（M）8.0 最大震度    震度7： 注1 福井県今立郡鯖江町、愛知県葉栗郡大田島村、東春日井郡勝川村 地震の種類 直下型地震 被害 死傷者数 死者7,273人、負傷者17,175人 注1：当時の震度階級では「激烈」 プロジェクト:地球科学 プロジェクト:災害 テンプレートを表示 濃尾地震 （のうびじしん）は、1891年（明治24年）10月28日に濃尾地方で発生した、日本史上最大の内陸地殻内地震。「 美濃・尾張地震 （みの・おわりじしん）」とも呼ばれている。辛卯の年に発生したことから 辛卯震災 と呼んでいる報告書もある。 目次 1 概要 1.1 震源断層 2 被害 3 各地の震度 4 前兆現象 5 報道 6 学術的な意義 7 地震防災 8 脚注 9 関連項目 10 外部リンク 概要 濃尾地震発生当時の根尾谷断層 濃尾地震を引き起こした根尾谷断層 写真中央を斜めに走る段差が根尾谷断層 濃尾地震は、1891年10月28日6時38分50秒に発生した。震源は、岐阜県本巣郡西根尾村（現・本巣市）、北緯35度35分、東経136度20分付近。河角廣 (1951) は岐阜市付近（北緯35.6度、東経136.6度）に震央を仮定し規模 M K = 7.0 を与え [1] 、マグニチュードは M = 8.4 に換算されているが、明治・大正期の地震については0.5程度大きく見積もられているとされる [2] 。また、震央距離と震度との関係など当時のデータから後にM8.0 [3] とも推定される。アメリカ地質調査所 (USGS) でも8.0としている [4] 。「根尾谷断層帯」が活動した典型的な内陸地殻内地震（いわゆる直下型地震）であり、これは記録が残っている日本の内陸
                      Read more