pacman “exists on filesystem” error
I ran sudo pacman -Syu
and I got some interesting errors reading:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
and a long list of files followed by exists in filesystem
. Full output is here: http://ix.io/lLw
It appears that many of these files are not associated with a package when I checked them with pacman -Qo <path-to-file>
, but I did not check them all. I had a weak connection when I ran pacman -Syu
, but I get the same errors when I updated later: http://ix.io/lLx
What should I do? Should I check all files and delete ones that do not have an associated package? Should I force update (with sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
?)
Update
I tried running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
and got this:
[my-pc]/home/average-joe$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
error: No package owns /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
It looks like pacman -S --force <package
does not overwrite directories that contain files. From the man:
Using --force will not allow overwriting a directory with a file or installing packages with conflicting files and directories.
Should I just delete the conflicting directories? (they do not have associated packages)
arch-linux pacman
add a comment |
I ran sudo pacman -Syu
and I got some interesting errors reading:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
and a long list of files followed by exists in filesystem
. Full output is here: http://ix.io/lLw
It appears that many of these files are not associated with a package when I checked them with pacman -Qo <path-to-file>
, but I did not check them all. I had a weak connection when I ran pacman -Syu
, but I get the same errors when I updated later: http://ix.io/lLx
What should I do? Should I check all files and delete ones that do not have an associated package? Should I force update (with sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
?)
Update
I tried running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
and got this:
[my-pc]/home/average-joe$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
error: No package owns /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
It looks like pacman -S --force <package
does not overwrite directories that contain files. From the man:
Using --force will not allow overwriting a directory with a file or installing packages with conflicting files and directories.
Should I just delete the conflicting directories? (they do not have associated packages)
arch-linux pacman
5
why do you have conflicting files in the first place? when using a package manager, try not to tap on its toes (e.g. by installing software in places the package manager rightfully thinks is theirs; if you must install things manually, install to/usr/local/
rather than/usr/
)
– umläute
Nov 2 '15 at 12:37
1
@umläute I am not exactly sure where the conflicting files came from, but I suspect they are related to my installation of docker-compose which I installed usingsudo pip install -U docker-compose==1.5.0rc3
on this page. Perhapssudo pip install
conflicts with pacman?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:47
1
@umläute Getting wrong-S
updates (partial installs, etc) will let you that scenario. Case of me--force
worked all times.
– erm3nda
May 23 '17 at 17:15
add a comment |
I ran sudo pacman -Syu
and I got some interesting errors reading:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
and a long list of files followed by exists in filesystem
. Full output is here: http://ix.io/lLw
It appears that many of these files are not associated with a package when I checked them with pacman -Qo <path-to-file>
, but I did not check them all. I had a weak connection when I ran pacman -Syu
, but I get the same errors when I updated later: http://ix.io/lLx
What should I do? Should I check all files and delete ones that do not have an associated package? Should I force update (with sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
?)
Update
I tried running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
and got this:
[my-pc]/home/average-joe$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
error: No package owns /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
It looks like pacman -S --force <package
does not overwrite directories that contain files. From the man:
Using --force will not allow overwriting a directory with a file or installing packages with conflicting files and directories.
Should I just delete the conflicting directories? (they do not have associated packages)
arch-linux pacman
I ran sudo pacman -Syu
and I got some interesting errors reading:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
and a long list of files followed by exists in filesystem
. Full output is here: http://ix.io/lLw
It appears that many of these files are not associated with a package when I checked them with pacman -Qo <path-to-file>
, but I did not check them all. I had a weak connection when I ran pacman -Syu
, but I get the same errors when I updated later: http://ix.io/lLx
What should I do? Should I check all files and delete ones that do not have an associated package? Should I force update (with sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
?)
Update
I tried running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
and got this:
[my-pc]/home/average-joe$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
error: No package owns /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/PyYAML-3.11-py3.5.egg-info
It looks like pacman -S --force <package
does not overwrite directories that contain files. From the man:
Using --force will not allow overwriting a directory with a file or installing packages with conflicting files and directories.
Should I just delete the conflicting directories? (they do not have associated packages)
arch-linux pacman
arch-linux pacman
asked Nov 2 '15 at 11:31
modulitosmodulitos
1,17261939
1,17261939
5
why do you have conflicting files in the first place? when using a package manager, try not to tap on its toes (e.g. by installing software in places the package manager rightfully thinks is theirs; if you must install things manually, install to/usr/local/
rather than/usr/
)
– umläute
Nov 2 '15 at 12:37
1
@umläute I am not exactly sure where the conflicting files came from, but I suspect they are related to my installation of docker-compose which I installed usingsudo pip install -U docker-compose==1.5.0rc3
on this page. Perhapssudo pip install
conflicts with pacman?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:47
1
@umläute Getting wrong-S
updates (partial installs, etc) will let you that scenario. Case of me--force
worked all times.
– erm3nda
May 23 '17 at 17:15
add a comment |
5
why do you have conflicting files in the first place? when using a package manager, try not to tap on its toes (e.g. by installing software in places the package manager rightfully thinks is theirs; if you must install things manually, install to/usr/local/
rather than/usr/
)
– umläute
Nov 2 '15 at 12:37
1
@umläute I am not exactly sure where the conflicting files came from, but I suspect they are related to my installation of docker-compose which I installed usingsudo pip install -U docker-compose==1.5.0rc3
on this page. Perhapssudo pip install
conflicts with pacman?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:47
1
@umläute Getting wrong-S
updates (partial installs, etc) will let you that scenario. Case of me--force
worked all times.
– erm3nda
May 23 '17 at 17:15
5
5
why do you have conflicting files in the first place? when using a package manager, try not to tap on its toes (e.g. by installing software in places the package manager rightfully thinks is theirs; if you must install things manually, install to
/usr/local/
rather than /usr/
)– umläute
Nov 2 '15 at 12:37
why do you have conflicting files in the first place? when using a package manager, try not to tap on its toes (e.g. by installing software in places the package manager rightfully thinks is theirs; if you must install things manually, install to
/usr/local/
rather than /usr/
)– umläute
Nov 2 '15 at 12:37
1
1
@umläute I am not exactly sure where the conflicting files came from, but I suspect they are related to my installation of docker-compose which I installed using
sudo pip install -U docker-compose==1.5.0rc3
on this page. Perhaps sudo pip install
conflicts with pacman?– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:47
@umläute I am not exactly sure where the conflicting files came from, but I suspect they are related to my installation of docker-compose which I installed using
sudo pip install -U docker-compose==1.5.0rc3
on this page. Perhaps sudo pip install
conflicts with pacman?– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:47
1
1
@umläute Getting wrong
-S
updates (partial installs, etc) will let you that scenario. Case of me --force
worked all times.– erm3nda
May 23 '17 at 17:15
@umläute Getting wrong
-S
updates (partial installs, etc) will let you that scenario. Case of me --force
worked all times.– erm3nda
May 23 '17 at 17:15
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Ok, it looks like running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works, but it doesn't resolve conflicting directories. In such cases, running sudo rm -rf
on the conflicting directories, followed by sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works.
Now my pacman -Syu
resolves well.
3
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
5
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
1
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.
– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
tl;dr: Uninstall the conflicting application before running pacman
.
pacman
(and other package managers) keep an index of packages and files that they manage (pacman --query --list
). Some files, such as configuration, will be marked as modifiable and will not be overwritten during upgrade (except in special circumstances, where the package manager will typically move away the old file before creating the new one). Other files will be marked as unmodifiable. If another application changes those files in any way without updating the index accordingly there's no way for the package manager to know what to do with those files during an upgrade.
Many applications installed using the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install
pattern can be uninstalled using sudo make uninstall
. If you have installed the application in some other way you might have to something else to uninstall it. In general it can be a good idea to keep a copy of installation files somewhere (for example ~/install
) to be able to reliably uninstall them in such cases. Just removing the conflicting files will probably leave other files lying around, which could conceivably cause other problems.
When installing software with other package managers there are ways to isolate those from the system files. This is an established best practice for example during software development, where you really want to keep versions consistent and avoid conflicts with other software. Examples include:
Python Virtualenv (example; in use)- Ruby Version Manager
1
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from asudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
add a comment |
I was installing packages that I usually install with pip via pacman because of this. But some packages arent found in pacman repos. I think we should avoid installing pip with sudo privilegies and istead:
pip install pillow --user
--user flag makes pip install packages in your home directory instead, which doesn't require any special privileges.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42988977/what-is-the-purpose-pip-install-user
add a comment |
TLDR;
- Get a list of the offending files (copy and paste pacman's output into a file).
- Use awk to strip out everything but the file paths into a new list.
- Use while to move the offending files out of the way, based on the list.
- Run
sudo pacman -Syu
again.
edited to add TLDR and fix typos
Although I'm pretty sure I haven't been doing anything stupid, I've had this problem maybe every other time I've tried to update since I've been using Manjaro; three or four times within two months. Point being, this fixes it.
Get a list of your files.
When the update fails in your terminal window, you get this:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
evilfile: /usr/bin/evilfile exists in filesystem
libx000: /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser exists in filesystem
accountsservice: /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/accounts-service.mo.yu.dnt.evn.spk.russian exists in filesystem
... and a lot more.
Copy the output from the terminal, and put it in a file. I used nano, and named mine "files," as in ~/work/files.
Strip extraneous info:
cat files | awk '{print $2}' >> ~/work/files2
This takes the second "word" from each line and prints it to files2.
Deal with the files
You could delete them, move them, or rename them.
If something breaks, it's easiest to fix if we break it by moving it instead of deleting or renaming it:
mkdir ~/work/oldfiles
while read -r file; do sudo mv -- "$file" ~/work/oldfiles/$file; done < files2If you really want to delete them, which there is no reason to do (DANGER DANGER): while read -r file; do sudo rm -- "$file"; done < files2
Updating
To get --overwrite to work, which we need to do to get pacman to realize the package isn't broken, you need the following syntax:
sudo pacman -S package_name --overwrite /location/of/thing
- In my case:
sudo pacman -S libidn2 --overwrite /usr/lib/libidn2.so.0
- Following the example:
sudo pacman -S libx000 --overwrite /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser
- In my case:
I had a cute problem where if I deleted the libidn2.so.0 symlink, nothing worked, and when I put it back, I got the "exists on filesystem" error. The above, with --overwrite, is all that worked for me.
Finally:
sudo pacman -Syu
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f240252%2fpacman-exists-on-filesystem-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Ok, it looks like running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works, but it doesn't resolve conflicting directories. In such cases, running sudo rm -rf
on the conflicting directories, followed by sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works.
Now my pacman -Syu
resolves well.
3
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
5
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
1
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.
– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
Ok, it looks like running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works, but it doesn't resolve conflicting directories. In such cases, running sudo rm -rf
on the conflicting directories, followed by sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works.
Now my pacman -Syu
resolves well.
3
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
5
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
1
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.
– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
Ok, it looks like running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works, but it doesn't resolve conflicting directories. In such cases, running sudo rm -rf
on the conflicting directories, followed by sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works.
Now my pacman -Syu
resolves well.
Ok, it looks like running sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works, but it doesn't resolve conflicting directories. In such cases, running sudo rm -rf
on the conflicting directories, followed by sudo pacman -S --force <package-name>
works.
Now my pacman -Syu
resolves well.
edited Jun 20 '18 at 6:25
answered Nov 2 '15 at 11:43
modulitosmodulitos
1,17261939
1,17261939
3
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
5
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
1
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.
– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
3
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
5
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
1
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.
– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
3
3
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
--force is deprecated; use --overwrite instead.
– Ankit Balyan
Jun 14 '18 at 8:37
5
5
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
--force is working for me but --overwrite is not
– Infernion
Jun 18 '18 at 13:19
1
1
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
sudo pacman -Syu --force
worked for me, but overwrite wasn't recognized.– spydon
Jul 2 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
tl;dr: Uninstall the conflicting application before running pacman
.
pacman
(and other package managers) keep an index of packages and files that they manage (pacman --query --list
). Some files, such as configuration, will be marked as modifiable and will not be overwritten during upgrade (except in special circumstances, where the package manager will typically move away the old file before creating the new one). Other files will be marked as unmodifiable. If another application changes those files in any way without updating the index accordingly there's no way for the package manager to know what to do with those files during an upgrade.
Many applications installed using the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install
pattern can be uninstalled using sudo make uninstall
. If you have installed the application in some other way you might have to something else to uninstall it. In general it can be a good idea to keep a copy of installation files somewhere (for example ~/install
) to be able to reliably uninstall them in such cases. Just removing the conflicting files will probably leave other files lying around, which could conceivably cause other problems.
When installing software with other package managers there are ways to isolate those from the system files. This is an established best practice for example during software development, where you really want to keep versions consistent and avoid conflicts with other software. Examples include:
Python Virtualenv (example; in use)- Ruby Version Manager
1
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from asudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
add a comment |
tl;dr: Uninstall the conflicting application before running pacman
.
pacman
(and other package managers) keep an index of packages and files that they manage (pacman --query --list
). Some files, such as configuration, will be marked as modifiable and will not be overwritten during upgrade (except in special circumstances, where the package manager will typically move away the old file before creating the new one). Other files will be marked as unmodifiable. If another application changes those files in any way without updating the index accordingly there's no way for the package manager to know what to do with those files during an upgrade.
Many applications installed using the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install
pattern can be uninstalled using sudo make uninstall
. If you have installed the application in some other way you might have to something else to uninstall it. In general it can be a good idea to keep a copy of installation files somewhere (for example ~/install
) to be able to reliably uninstall them in such cases. Just removing the conflicting files will probably leave other files lying around, which could conceivably cause other problems.
When installing software with other package managers there are ways to isolate those from the system files. This is an established best practice for example during software development, where you really want to keep versions consistent and avoid conflicts with other software. Examples include:
Python Virtualenv (example; in use)- Ruby Version Manager
1
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from asudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
add a comment |
tl;dr: Uninstall the conflicting application before running pacman
.
pacman
(and other package managers) keep an index of packages and files that they manage (pacman --query --list
). Some files, such as configuration, will be marked as modifiable and will not be overwritten during upgrade (except in special circumstances, where the package manager will typically move away the old file before creating the new one). Other files will be marked as unmodifiable. If another application changes those files in any way without updating the index accordingly there's no way for the package manager to know what to do with those files during an upgrade.
Many applications installed using the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install
pattern can be uninstalled using sudo make uninstall
. If you have installed the application in some other way you might have to something else to uninstall it. In general it can be a good idea to keep a copy of installation files somewhere (for example ~/install
) to be able to reliably uninstall them in such cases. Just removing the conflicting files will probably leave other files lying around, which could conceivably cause other problems.
When installing software with other package managers there are ways to isolate those from the system files. This is an established best practice for example during software development, where you really want to keep versions consistent and avoid conflicts with other software. Examples include:
Python Virtualenv (example; in use)- Ruby Version Manager
tl;dr: Uninstall the conflicting application before running pacman
.
pacman
(and other package managers) keep an index of packages and files that they manage (pacman --query --list
). Some files, such as configuration, will be marked as modifiable and will not be overwritten during upgrade (except in special circumstances, where the package manager will typically move away the old file before creating the new one). Other files will be marked as unmodifiable. If another application changes those files in any way without updating the index accordingly there's no way for the package manager to know what to do with those files during an upgrade.
Many applications installed using the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install
pattern can be uninstalled using sudo make uninstall
. If you have installed the application in some other way you might have to something else to uninstall it. In general it can be a good idea to keep a copy of installation files somewhere (for example ~/install
) to be able to reliably uninstall them in such cases. Just removing the conflicting files will probably leave other files lying around, which could conceivably cause other problems.
When installing software with other package managers there are ways to isolate those from the system files. This is an established best practice for example during software development, where you really want to keep versions consistent and avoid conflicts with other software. Examples include:
Python Virtualenv (example; in use)- Ruby Version Manager
edited Nov 3 '15 at 8:16
answered Nov 2 '15 at 12:57
l0b0l0b0
28.4k19119248
28.4k19119248
1
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from asudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
add a comment |
1
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from asudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?
– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
1
1
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from a
sudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
See my comment to @umlaute above. I think the conflict was from a
sudo pip install
command. Perhaps I should avoid using pip with sudo?– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:48
add a comment |
I was installing packages that I usually install with pip via pacman because of this. But some packages arent found in pacman repos. I think we should avoid installing pip with sudo privilegies and istead:
pip install pillow --user
--user flag makes pip install packages in your home directory instead, which doesn't require any special privileges.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42988977/what-is-the-purpose-pip-install-user
add a comment |
I was installing packages that I usually install with pip via pacman because of this. But some packages arent found in pacman repos. I think we should avoid installing pip with sudo privilegies and istead:
pip install pillow --user
--user flag makes pip install packages in your home directory instead, which doesn't require any special privileges.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42988977/what-is-the-purpose-pip-install-user
add a comment |
I was installing packages that I usually install with pip via pacman because of this. But some packages arent found in pacman repos. I think we should avoid installing pip with sudo privilegies and istead:
pip install pillow --user
--user flag makes pip install packages in your home directory instead, which doesn't require any special privileges.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42988977/what-is-the-purpose-pip-install-user
I was installing packages that I usually install with pip via pacman because of this. But some packages arent found in pacman repos. I think we should avoid installing pip with sudo privilegies and istead:
pip install pillow --user
--user flag makes pip install packages in your home directory instead, which doesn't require any special privileges.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42988977/what-is-the-purpose-pip-install-user
answered Jul 25 '18 at 16:48
lava-lavalava-lava
1112
1112
add a comment |
add a comment |
TLDR;
- Get a list of the offending files (copy and paste pacman's output into a file).
- Use awk to strip out everything but the file paths into a new list.
- Use while to move the offending files out of the way, based on the list.
- Run
sudo pacman -Syu
again.
edited to add TLDR and fix typos
Although I'm pretty sure I haven't been doing anything stupid, I've had this problem maybe every other time I've tried to update since I've been using Manjaro; three or four times within two months. Point being, this fixes it.
Get a list of your files.
When the update fails in your terminal window, you get this:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
evilfile: /usr/bin/evilfile exists in filesystem
libx000: /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser exists in filesystem
accountsservice: /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/accounts-service.mo.yu.dnt.evn.spk.russian exists in filesystem
... and a lot more.
Copy the output from the terminal, and put it in a file. I used nano, and named mine "files," as in ~/work/files.
Strip extraneous info:
cat files | awk '{print $2}' >> ~/work/files2
This takes the second "word" from each line and prints it to files2.
Deal with the files
You could delete them, move them, or rename them.
If something breaks, it's easiest to fix if we break it by moving it instead of deleting or renaming it:
mkdir ~/work/oldfiles
while read -r file; do sudo mv -- "$file" ~/work/oldfiles/$file; done < files2If you really want to delete them, which there is no reason to do (DANGER DANGER): while read -r file; do sudo rm -- "$file"; done < files2
Updating
To get --overwrite to work, which we need to do to get pacman to realize the package isn't broken, you need the following syntax:
sudo pacman -S package_name --overwrite /location/of/thing
- In my case:
sudo pacman -S libidn2 --overwrite /usr/lib/libidn2.so.0
- Following the example:
sudo pacman -S libx000 --overwrite /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser
- In my case:
I had a cute problem where if I deleted the libidn2.so.0 symlink, nothing worked, and when I put it back, I got the "exists on filesystem" error. The above, with --overwrite, is all that worked for me.
Finally:
sudo pacman -Syu
add a comment |
TLDR;
- Get a list of the offending files (copy and paste pacman's output into a file).
- Use awk to strip out everything but the file paths into a new list.
- Use while to move the offending files out of the way, based on the list.
- Run
sudo pacman -Syu
again.
edited to add TLDR and fix typos
Although I'm pretty sure I haven't been doing anything stupid, I've had this problem maybe every other time I've tried to update since I've been using Manjaro; three or four times within two months. Point being, this fixes it.
Get a list of your files.
When the update fails in your terminal window, you get this:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
evilfile: /usr/bin/evilfile exists in filesystem
libx000: /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser exists in filesystem
accountsservice: /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/accounts-service.mo.yu.dnt.evn.spk.russian exists in filesystem
... and a lot more.
Copy the output from the terminal, and put it in a file. I used nano, and named mine "files," as in ~/work/files.
Strip extraneous info:
cat files | awk '{print $2}' >> ~/work/files2
This takes the second "word" from each line and prints it to files2.
Deal with the files
You could delete them, move them, or rename them.
If something breaks, it's easiest to fix if we break it by moving it instead of deleting or renaming it:
mkdir ~/work/oldfiles
while read -r file; do sudo mv -- "$file" ~/work/oldfiles/$file; done < files2If you really want to delete them, which there is no reason to do (DANGER DANGER): while read -r file; do sudo rm -- "$file"; done < files2
Updating
To get --overwrite to work, which we need to do to get pacman to realize the package isn't broken, you need the following syntax:
sudo pacman -S package_name --overwrite /location/of/thing
- In my case:
sudo pacman -S libidn2 --overwrite /usr/lib/libidn2.so.0
- Following the example:
sudo pacman -S libx000 --overwrite /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser
- In my case:
I had a cute problem where if I deleted the libidn2.so.0 symlink, nothing worked, and when I put it back, I got the "exists on filesystem" error. The above, with --overwrite, is all that worked for me.
Finally:
sudo pacman -Syu
add a comment |
TLDR;
- Get a list of the offending files (copy and paste pacman's output into a file).
- Use awk to strip out everything but the file paths into a new list.
- Use while to move the offending files out of the way, based on the list.
- Run
sudo pacman -Syu
again.
edited to add TLDR and fix typos
Although I'm pretty sure I haven't been doing anything stupid, I've had this problem maybe every other time I've tried to update since I've been using Manjaro; three or four times within two months. Point being, this fixes it.
Get a list of your files.
When the update fails in your terminal window, you get this:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
evilfile: /usr/bin/evilfile exists in filesystem
libx000: /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser exists in filesystem
accountsservice: /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/accounts-service.mo.yu.dnt.evn.spk.russian exists in filesystem
... and a lot more.
Copy the output from the terminal, and put it in a file. I used nano, and named mine "files," as in ~/work/files.
Strip extraneous info:
cat files | awk '{print $2}' >> ~/work/files2
This takes the second "word" from each line and prints it to files2.
Deal with the files
You could delete them, move them, or rename them.
If something breaks, it's easiest to fix if we break it by moving it instead of deleting or renaming it:
mkdir ~/work/oldfiles
while read -r file; do sudo mv -- "$file" ~/work/oldfiles/$file; done < files2If you really want to delete them, which there is no reason to do (DANGER DANGER): while read -r file; do sudo rm -- "$file"; done < files2
Updating
To get --overwrite to work, which we need to do to get pacman to realize the package isn't broken, you need the following syntax:
sudo pacman -S package_name --overwrite /location/of/thing
- In my case:
sudo pacman -S libidn2 --overwrite /usr/lib/libidn2.so.0
- Following the example:
sudo pacman -S libx000 --overwrite /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser
- In my case:
I had a cute problem where if I deleted the libidn2.so.0 symlink, nothing worked, and when I put it back, I got the "exists on filesystem" error. The above, with --overwrite, is all that worked for me.
Finally:
sudo pacman -Syu
TLDR;
- Get a list of the offending files (copy and paste pacman's output into a file).
- Use awk to strip out everything but the file paths into a new list.
- Use while to move the offending files out of the way, based on the list.
- Run
sudo pacman -Syu
again.
edited to add TLDR and fix typos
Although I'm pretty sure I haven't been doing anything stupid, I've had this problem maybe every other time I've tried to update since I've been using Manjaro; three or four times within two months. Point being, this fixes it.
Get a list of your files.
When the update fails in your terminal window, you get this:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
evilfile: /usr/bin/evilfile exists in filesystem
libx000: /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser exists in filesystem
accountsservice: /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/accounts-service.mo.yu.dnt.evn.spk.russian exists in filesystem
... and a lot more.
Copy the output from the terminal, and put it in a file. I used nano, and named mine "files," as in ~/work/files.
Strip extraneous info:
cat files | awk '{print $2}' >> ~/work/files2
This takes the second "word" from each line and prints it to files2.
Deal with the files
You could delete them, move them, or rename them.
If something breaks, it's easiest to fix if we break it by moving it instead of deleting or renaming it:
mkdir ~/work/oldfiles
while read -r file; do sudo mv -- "$file" ~/work/oldfiles/$file; done < files2If you really want to delete them, which there is no reason to do (DANGER DANGER): while read -r file; do sudo rm -- "$file"; done < files2
Updating
To get --overwrite to work, which we need to do to get pacman to realize the package isn't broken, you need the following syntax:
sudo pacman -S package_name --overwrite /location/of/thing
- In my case:
sudo pacman -S libidn2 --overwrite /usr/lib/libidn2.so.0
- Following the example:
sudo pacman -S libx000 --overwrite /usr/lib/libx000.so.f.u.loser
- In my case:
I had a cute problem where if I deleted the libidn2.so.0 symlink, nothing worked, and when I put it back, I got the "exists on filesystem" error. The above, with --overwrite, is all that worked for me.
Finally:
sudo pacman -Syu
edited 10 mins ago
answered 20 mins ago
Fin HirschoffFin Hirschoff
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f240252%2fpacman-exists-on-filesystem-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
why do you have conflicting files in the first place? when using a package manager, try not to tap on its toes (e.g. by installing software in places the package manager rightfully thinks is theirs; if you must install things manually, install to
/usr/local/
rather than/usr/
)– umläute
Nov 2 '15 at 12:37
1
@umläute I am not exactly sure where the conflicting files came from, but I suspect they are related to my installation of docker-compose which I installed using
sudo pip install -U docker-compose==1.5.0rc3
on this page. Perhapssudo pip install
conflicts with pacman?– modulitos
Nov 3 '15 at 7:47
1
@umläute Getting wrong
-S
updates (partial installs, etc) will let you that scenario. Case of me--force
worked all times.– erm3nda
May 23 '17 at 17:15