Different standards of ELF (SysV vs TIS) and Linux?
There are at least two standards of Executable and Linkable Format
(ELF), one of them
- System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement (With LP64 and ILP32 Programming Models) Version 1.0
- Tool Interface Standard (TIS) Executable and Linking Format (ELF)
Specification Version 1.2
The older one, the TIS ELF Standard 1.2 is 106 pages while the SysV ABI is 157 pages but covers ELF only on pages 63-86 (23 pages).
How do these two standards relate to each other? And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use? What is the Tool Interface Standard?
linux elf standard ld
add a comment |
There are at least two standards of Executable and Linkable Format
(ELF), one of them
- System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement (With LP64 and ILP32 Programming Models) Version 1.0
- Tool Interface Standard (TIS) Executable and Linking Format (ELF)
Specification Version 1.2
The older one, the TIS ELF Standard 1.2 is 106 pages while the SysV ABI is 157 pages but covers ELF only on pages 63-86 (23 pages).
How do these two standards relate to each other? And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use? What is the Tool Interface Standard?
linux elf standard ld
add a comment |
There are at least two standards of Executable and Linkable Format
(ELF), one of them
- System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement (With LP64 and ILP32 Programming Models) Version 1.0
- Tool Interface Standard (TIS) Executable and Linking Format (ELF)
Specification Version 1.2
The older one, the TIS ELF Standard 1.2 is 106 pages while the SysV ABI is 157 pages but covers ELF only on pages 63-86 (23 pages).
How do these two standards relate to each other? And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use? What is the Tool Interface Standard?
linux elf standard ld
There are at least two standards of Executable and Linkable Format
(ELF), one of them
- System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement (With LP64 and ILP32 Programming Models) Version 1.0
- Tool Interface Standard (TIS) Executable and Linking Format (ELF)
Specification Version 1.2
The older one, the TIS ELF Standard 1.2 is 106 pages while the SysV ABI is 157 pages but covers ELF only on pages 63-86 (23 pages).
How do these two standards relate to each other? And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use? What is the Tool Interface Standard?
linux elf standard ld
linux elf standard ld
edited Nov 21 '18 at 19:52
Evan Carroll
asked Nov 21 '18 at 19:32
Evan CarrollEvan Carroll
5,882114584
5,882114584
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The TIS/ELF one covers ELF in general, while the System V ABI is a supplement which documents the x86_64 Application Binary Interface.
The second document does not contain any information about x86_64 since the architecture didn't exist at the time it was written.
add a comment |
What is the Tool Interface Standard?
ELF format has been selected by the Tool Interface Standards committee (TIS) as a standard for portable object files for a variety of (Unix-Like) operating systems.
And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use?
Almost of them uses SYSV standard.
name@host:~$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483283%2fdifferent-standards-of-elf-sysv-vs-tis-and-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The TIS/ELF one covers ELF in general, while the System V ABI is a supplement which documents the x86_64 Application Binary Interface.
The second document does not contain any information about x86_64 since the architecture didn't exist at the time it was written.
add a comment |
The TIS/ELF one covers ELF in general, while the System V ABI is a supplement which documents the x86_64 Application Binary Interface.
The second document does not contain any information about x86_64 since the architecture didn't exist at the time it was written.
add a comment |
The TIS/ELF one covers ELF in general, while the System V ABI is a supplement which documents the x86_64 Application Binary Interface.
The second document does not contain any information about x86_64 since the architecture didn't exist at the time it was written.
The TIS/ELF one covers ELF in general, while the System V ABI is a supplement which documents the x86_64 Application Binary Interface.
The second document does not contain any information about x86_64 since the architecture didn't exist at the time it was written.
edited 9 mins ago
Evan Carroll
5,882114584
5,882114584
answered Nov 21 '18 at 20:22
Johan MyréenJohan Myréen
7,80711525
7,80711525
add a comment |
add a comment |
What is the Tool Interface Standard?
ELF format has been selected by the Tool Interface Standards committee (TIS) as a standard for portable object files for a variety of (Unix-Like) operating systems.
And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use?
Almost of them uses SYSV standard.
name@host:~$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
add a comment |
What is the Tool Interface Standard?
ELF format has been selected by the Tool Interface Standards committee (TIS) as a standard for portable object files for a variety of (Unix-Like) operating systems.
And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use?
Almost of them uses SYSV standard.
name@host:~$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
add a comment |
What is the Tool Interface Standard?
ELF format has been selected by the Tool Interface Standards committee (TIS) as a standard for portable object files for a variety of (Unix-Like) operating systems.
And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use?
Almost of them uses SYSV standard.
name@host:~$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
What is the Tool Interface Standard?
ELF format has been selected by the Tool Interface Standards committee (TIS) as a standard for portable object files for a variety of (Unix-Like) operating systems.
And which one does Linux and GNU Linker use?
Almost of them uses SYSV standard.
name@host:~$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
answered Nov 25 '18 at 9:29
finnfinn
1714
1714
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483283%2fdifferent-standards-of-elf-sysv-vs-tis-and-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown